Q A.pdf

WA Lewis 707(1) Cispus Road Improvements

# General Technical Question Answer Date 1 x

I am requesting that you consider a change to an emulsified asphalt binder as per Standard Specification #702.02 (specifically CRS-2P).

This asphalt has been proven to work best in the Northwest, and the cost would be considerably less.

no change will be made 3/24/16

2 x

Is it OK for vehicular traffic to operate on gravel surfacing between storm installation and final paving yes 3/30/16

3 x

Is it the intended to replace the storm culvert at Sta: 5.15 with a smaller culvert than that is existing. Storm schedule and plans contradict each other.

18"

3/30/16

4 x

There are several culverts that show the incorrect flow direction, is this the intent upon new construction.

No. Intent is to match existing flow and invert elevations.

3/30/16

5 x Which crossings are assumed to have the division channel. MP 2.76 3/30/16

6 x Are road closures allowed? See Amendment A001 3/31/16

7 x Are excavated materials acceptable for embankment fill? See Section 204 in FP‐14 3/31/16

Check General or Technical

8 x

Is the Asphalt Concrete Pavement Patch required at the pipe culvert replacement locations incidental to the Pipe Culvert bid items or will it be included in the Asphalt Concrete Pavement Patch bid items?

It is incidental to the Pipe Culvert bid items

3/31/16

9 x

Are hubs/blue tops going to be required for the placement of the 6” of crushed aggregate at all of the asphalt concrete pavement patch locations? no 3/31/16

10 x Sheet G.2 shows Detail A, is that actually supposed to be the Full Depth Patch Type 3

Detail A is for when the patch is on the edge of pavement. See Subsection 418.05 Asphalt Pavement Patch, Type 3.

3/31/16

11 x

Would it be allowable implement a detour route utilizing Forest Service Road #2305 during the removal/installation of the 36‐Inch Pipe Culvert required at M.P. 2.76

See Amendment A001

3/31/16