Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Wescam Camera Systems
- Solicitation number
- DJD-15-R-0013
About this file
Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| Request_for_Proposal_(RFP)_DJD-15-R-0013.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
NAME OF FIRM TO BE EVALUATED: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS EO/IR, INC.
The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain an evaluation of past performance on a contract that has been completed or is currently being performed by the Contractor listed above. You have received this questionnaire because the Contractor selected you to provide this evaluation in response to a request by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for past performance information. DEA will use the information you provide to assess the level of confidence associated with the Contractor’s ability to perform the requirements of Wescam Camera Systems. The information you provide may be released to the Contractor during debriefings, however the source of the information will not be released.
It is requested that the cognizant Program Manager or Contracting Officer Representative complete the evaluation. Please complete this past performance questionnaire by answering the questions below and submitting your responses by email to Carmen.Castro-Pagan@usdoj.gov no later than Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:00am.
Thank you for your assistance in this Past Performance evaluation process.
Ms. Carmen Castro-Pagan DEA Contract Support Specialist
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION: DJD-15-R-0013
CONTRACTING
| OFFICER: | Eliana Zavala | |
| REQUIREMENT: | Wescam MX Camera Systems |
CONTRACT INFORMATION
Contractor Name and Address: __________________________________________ Contract Number/Contract Title: __________________________________________
| Contract Value ($): | __________________________________________ | ||
| Period of Performance: | __________________________________________ | ||
| Description of Work Performed: | __________________________________________ |
EVALUATOR INFORMATION
| Name and Title of Evaluator: | __________________________________________ | |
| Agency/Company Name: | __________________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | __________________________________________ |
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Please rate the contractor on the abilities listed below by circling the appropriate number to the right. The following definitions apply:
| 1 = Unacceptable Performance: | Requirements were not achieved with significant consequences. |
| 2 = Marginal Performance: | Requirements were frequently not fully achieved, often with significant consequences. |
| 3 = Adequate Performance: | Requirements were generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and in most cases with minor consequences. |
| 4 = Good Performance: | Requirements were achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences. |
| 5 = Excellent Performance: | Requirements were essentially always achieved or exceeded. |
| NA = Not applicable | This does not apply to the work that was performed. |
| 1. Ability to manage daily operational and contractual tasks. | |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| NA |
| 1. Ability to submit required reports and deliverables on schedule. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| 1. Ability to prepare and submit accurate and timely invoices for completed work. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| 1. Ability to resolve problems, initiate corrective actions and negotiate contract changes and modifications. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| 1. Ability to effectively manage subcontractors, facilitate information exchanges and expedite work flows. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| 1. Ability to respond to customer requests. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Please provide any additional comments to describe the Contractor’s performance as it relates to contract management:
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
Please rate the contractor on the abilities listed below by circling the appropriate number to the right. The following definitions apply:
| 1 = Unacceptable Performance: | Requirements were not achieved with significant consequences. |
| 2 = Marginal Performance: | Requirements were frequently not fully achieved, often with significant consequences. |
| 3 = Adequate Performance: | Requirements were generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and in most cases with minor consequences. |
| 4 = Good Performance: | Requirements were achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences. |
| 5 = Excellent Performance: | Requirements were essentially always achieved or exceeded. |
| NA = Not applicable | This does not apply to the work that was performed. |
| 1. Overall quality of Wescam Camera Systems delivered. | |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| NA |
| 1. Overall timeliness of delivery and ability to provide the supplies as needed. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| 1. Overall relationships with customers and subcontractors. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| 1. Overall commitment to customer satisfaction. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Would you hire this contractor again? (please check one) _________yes __________no If “no,” please explain why you would not hire this contractor again:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .