Data Security Checklist_AED Mgmt and Maint.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 106 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFQ - AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS (AED) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES
- Solicitation number
- BPM013307
- Issued by
- California
About this file
This is a Data Security Checklist document prepared by the County of San Diego establishing baseline security requirements for an Automated External Defibrillators (AED) Management and Maintenance program. The checklist outlines security controls across multiple frameworks including the County's Baseline requirements, Sensitive Personally Identifiable Information (PII) standards, HIPAA Electronic Protected Health Information (EPHI) requirements, and Federal Tax Information (FTI) compliance standards as defined by the Internal Revenue Service. The document does not specify quantities, response dates, due dates, site visits, bidders' conferences, award dates, or contract terms, as it functions as a technical security specification document rather than a procurement solicitation.
The security requirements encompass multiple control areas including access control, audit and accountability, identification and authentication, incident response, contingency planning, configuration management, system and communications protection, and information integrity. Specific mandates include Single Sign-On (SSO) integration with County identity providers using SAML 2.0, OAuth 2.0, or WS-Federation; encryption of data at rest and in transit; multi-factor authentication capabilities; weekly vulnerability scanning; annual penetration testing; daily backup solutions with minimum 180-day retention; 24/7/365 Security Operations Center monitoring; and mandatory incident reporting within 24 hours to appropriate authorities. All solution support must be provided from locations within the United States, and all data must remain within U.S. geographic boundaries. The document emphasizes protection of sensitive health information and tax data, requiring compliance with HIPAA standards and IRS safeguard regulations, with detailed audit logging, access controls, and physical security requirements specified throughout.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ 13307.pdf | ||
| Information Technology Requirements_AED Mgmt and Maint.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| aed_locations_and_serial_numbers.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Open to Public
| County of San Diego Baseline Open to Public Security Requirements Checklist | ||||
| Control Section | Requirement | Yes | No | Exception Explanation |
| AC - Access Control | Solution shall display any required approprite privacy and security banners | |||
| AU - Audit and Accountability | Solutions security audit logs must protected from unauthorized access, modification or deletion | |||
| CM - Configuration Management | Solution shall only utilize technologies and components that are actively supported by maintenance contracts | |||
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution shall provide a backup solution | |||
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution maintains at a minimum of 30 days of backup data | |||
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution shall Provide Disaster Recovery | |||
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Contractor's solution shall support Single Sign On (SSO) and integrate user authentication with the CoSD identity provider via Security Assertion Mark-up Language (SAML) 2.0 or Open ID Connect (OAuth) 2.0 or WS-Federation integration. County ID (ex: srwillam) is the standard claim attribute for SSO integration (CoSD ID will be used for the Claim ID, not email address).Contractor shall work with County staff and County's Information Technology provider to implement and test SSO integration for County users. If using OAuth 2.0 vendor shall use Authorization Code flow, PKCE, and the State parameter. Contractor shall work with County staff and County's Information Technology provider to implement and test SSO integration for County users. |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution must ensure the information system uniquely identifies and authenticates all users |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution should provide multi-factor authentication (MFA) if County SSO is not implemented |
| IR - Incident Response | Solution must provide a published breach disclosure policy |
| IR - Incident Response | Solution should provide a 24x7x365 Security Operations Center Monitoring |
| IR - Incident Response | Solution must maintain and regularly test an Incident Response Plan and provide investigation support in a breach |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provider must ensure vendor-defined high severity and above information system vulnerabilities are remediated prior to release to production |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provides vulnerability scanning at least monthly for operating systems, system components, dynamic web applications and static code analysis |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Security patches for vendor-defined high severity and above vulnerabilities must be implemented within 30 days of availability and disclosure |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Vulnerability mitigations must be put in place for vendor-defined high and above severity vulnerabilities while a full patch is being developed |
| SA - System and Services Acquisition | Solution must display a privacy policy that discloses the ways the provider collects, uses, discloses and manages customer data |
| SA - System and Services Acquisition | Solution provider must not share County data with another party without explicit written permission of the customer |
| SA - System and Services Acquisition | All support for the solution must be provided from or at locations within the geographic boundaries of the United States |
| SA - System and Services Acquisition | All data stored and processed by the solution must remain within the geographic boundaries of the United States |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution must ensure the information system is configured to protect against (or limit the effectiveness of) denial of service attacks |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution's APIs/open interfaces must be secured and encrypted |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must provide anti-malware protections |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution should provide a web application firewall (WAF) |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must encrypt data at rest |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must encrypt data in transit |
Moderate Baseline Requirements
| County of San Diego Baseline Security Requirements Checklist | ||||
| Control Section | Requirement | Yes | No | Exception Explanation |
| AC - Access Control | Solution must be able enforce restrictive controls for administrative access, system or application changes, and change/delete access to audit logs | |||
| AC - Access Control | Solution must utilize role-based access to prevent user acess to unapproved content | |||
| AC - Access Control | Solution must display any required approprite privacy and security banners | |||
| AC - Access Control | For systems capable of external sharing, solution must have the ability to authorize, control and limit external sharing | |||
| AU - Audit and Accountability | Solution should have a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solution | |||
| AU - Audit and Accountability | Solutions security tools should integrate with a SIEM solution | |||
| AU - Audit and Accountability | Solution security audit logs must be protected from unauthorized access, modification or deletion | |||
| CA - Security Assessment and Authorization | Supplier maintains a current SOC 2 Type II audit report prepared by a third party auditor consisting of a comprehensive internal controls assessment covering the internal controls and information security posture of the contracted service or product. | |||
| CM - Configuration Management | Solution must only utilize technologies and components that are actively supported by maintenance contracts | |||
| CM - Configuration Management | Solution should provide Integrated Change Notification | |||
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution must provide a daily backup solution | |||
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution should maintain at a minimum of 180 days of application backup data | |||
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution must include a viable, annually-tested Disaster Recovery plan | |||
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Contractor's solution shall support Single Sign On (SSO) and integrate user authentication with the CoSD identity provider via Security Assertion Mark-up Language (SAML) 2.0 or Open ID Connect (OAuth) 2.0 or WS-Federation integration. County ID (ex: srwillam) is the standard claim attribute for SSO integration (CoSD ID will be used for the Claim ID, not email address).Contractor shall work with County staff and County's Information Technology provider to implement and test SSO integration for County users. If using OAuth 2.0 vendor shall use Authorization Code flow, PKCE, and the State parameter. Contractor shall work with County staff and County's Information Technology provider to implement and test SSO integration for County users. |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution must ensure the information system uniquely identifies and authenticates all users |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution should provide multi-factor authentication (MFA) |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution must ensure information system default account passwords are changed prior to release to production |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution must not store passwords or API keys inside source code |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution must support periodic application and service account password changes including changing all default administrator passwords, at least annually |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution must store and transmit passwords in an encrypted format so that passwords do not display in a clear text |
| IR - Incident Response | Solution provider must have a published breach disclosure policy |
| IR - Incident Response | Solution should be supported by a 24x7x365 Security Operations Center |
| IR - Incident Response | Solution provider must maintain and regularly test an Incident Response Plan and provide investigation support in a breach |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provider must perform Penetration Testing annually |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provider must ensure vendor-defined high severity and above information system vulnerabilities are remediated prior to release to production |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Vulnerability scanning is performed at least weekly for operating systems, system components, dynamic web applications and static code analysis |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Security patches for vendor-defined high severity and above vulnerabilities must be implemented within 30 days of availability |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Vulnerability mitigations must be put in place for vendor-defined high and above severity vulnerabilities while a full patch is being developed |
| SA - System and Services Acquisition | Solution adheres to a privacy policy that discloses the ways the provider gathers, uses, discloses and manages customer data |
| SA - System and Services Acquisition | Solution provider must not share County data with another party without explicit permission of the customer |
| SA - System and Services Acquisition | All support for the solution must be provided from or at locations within the geographic boundaries of the United States |
| SA - System and Services Acquisition | All data stored and processed by the solution must remain within the geographic boundaries of the United States |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution must ensure the information system is configured to protect against (or limit the effectiveness of) denial of service attacks |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution must ensure the information system monitors and controls communication at the external boundary of the system and at key internal boundaries (such as development) within the system |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution's APIs/open interfaces must be secured and encrypted |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must incorporate anti-malware protection at network and host platform levels |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must ensure the information system employs malicious code protection at information system entry and exit points to detect and eradicate malicious code |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must ensure the information system malicious code protection is configured to perform periodic scans and real-time scans of files from external sources as they are downloaded, opened, or executed |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must ensure the information system malicious code protection must block or quarantine malicious code and send an alert to an administrator in response to malicious code detection |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must ensure the information system must be capable of detecting and preventing attacks and indicators of potential attacks and ensure all events are forwarded to the Security Incident and Event Manager |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must have a Firewall |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution should have or integrate with a web application firewall (WAF) |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must encrypt data at rest |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must encrypt data in transit |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Multitenant solutions must support partitioning of County data |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must incorporate intrusion prevention and detection capabilities |
Sensitive PII
| County of San Diego Sensitive PII Security Requirements Checklist | ||||
| Control Section | Requirement | Yes | No | Exception Explanation |
| AC - Access Control | Solution shall control access to PII through access control policies and access enforcement mechanisms e.g. RBAC, Least Priviledged, Encryption | |||
| AU - Audit and Accountability | Solution must monitor events that affect the confidentiality of PII, such as unauthorized access to PII | |||
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution must be able to uniquely identify and authenticate users before accessing PII |
| MP - Media Protection | Solution must Sanitize digital and non-digital media containing PII before it is disposed e.g. degaussing |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution must protect the confidentiality of transmitted PII and All data in transmitted must be encrypted |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution must protect the confidentiality of PII at rest and all PII Data at rest must be encrypted. |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must employ automated tools to monitor PII internally or at network boundaries for unusual or suspicious transfers or events e.g. DLP/SIEM |
EPHI HIPAA
| County of San Diego HIPAA Security Requirements Checklist | ||||
| Control Section | Requirement | Yes | No | Exception Explanation |
| AC - Access Control | Solution must assign a unique name and/or number for identifying and tracking user identities | |||
| AC - Access Control | Solution provider must implement procedures for obtaining and restricting access to County of San Diego electronic protected health information | |||
| AC - Access Control | Solution must implement electronic procedures that terminates an electronic session after 15 minutes of inactivity | |||
| AC - Access Control | Solution must implement a mechanism to encrypt and decrypt electronic protected health information | |||
| AC - Access Control | Solution provider must implement procedures for the authorization and/or supervision of workforce members who work with electronic protected health information or in locations where it might be accessed | |||
| AC - Access Control | If a healthcare clearinghouse is part of a larger organization, the clearinghouse must implement policies and procedures that protect the electronic protected health information of the clearinghouse from unauthorized access by the larger organization | |||
| AT - Awareness and Training | Solution provider must implement a security awareness and training program for all members of its workforce (including management) including periodic security updates at least annually | |||
| AU - Audit and Accountability | Solution provide must implement procedures to regularly review records of information system activity, such as audit logs, access reports, and security incident tracking reports | |||
| AU - Audit and Accountability | Implements procedures for monitoring log-in attempts and reporting discrepancies | |||
| Solution provider must implement event audit logging of |
1. System and application file access.
2. System change attempts.
3. User and Service account changes, including:
a. Account creation.
b. Account role changes/modification.
c. Deletion.
4. Use of privileged user account.
5. The application logs activities of privileged users.
6. Changes to the security configuration (e.g. change of user(s) privileges, deletion of audit log, etc.) of the solution logged.
| CA - Security Assessment and Authorization | Solution provider must provide a security official or privacy officer who is responsible for the development and implementation of the policies and procedures required by this subpart for the entity |
| CA - Security Assessment and Authorization | Solution provider must perform a periodic technical and nontechnical evaluation, based initially upon the standards implemented under this rule and subsequently, in response to environmental or operational changes affecting the security of electronic protected health information that establishes the extent to which an entity’s security policies and procedures meet the requirements of this subpart |
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution provider must implement policies and procedures to protect electronic protected health information from improper alteration or destruction |
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution provider must implement policies and procedures for responding to an emergency or other occurrence (for example, fire, vandalism, system failure, and natural disaster) that damages systems that contain electronic protected health information |
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution provider must implement procedures to restore any loss of county data |
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution provider must implement procedures to enable continuation of critical business processes for protection of the security of county of San Diego electronic protected health information while operating in emergency mode |
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution provider must implement procedures for periodic testing and revision of contingency plans |
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution provider must implement procedures that authorizes and documents the provider facility access in support of restoration of lost county data under the disaster recovery plan and emergency mode operations plan in the event of an emergency |
| CP - Contingency Planning | Solution provider must implement procedures to create a retrievable exact copy of county of San Diego electronic protected health information, when needed, before movement of equipment |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution provider must implement procedures to verify that a person or entity seeking access to county of San Diego electronic protected health information is the one claimed |
| IA - Identification and Authentication | Solution provider must Implement procedures for creating, changing, and safeguarding passwords |
| IR - Incident Response | Solution provider must have an Incident Response Plan that documents and implement policies and procedures to: |
* Identify and respond to suspected or known security incidents
* Mitigate, to the extent practicable, harmful effects of security incidents that are known to the covered entity
* Documents security incidents and their outcomes
| MA - Maintenance | Solution provider must implement policies and procedures to document repairs and modifications to the physical components of a facility which are related to security (for example, hardware, walls, doors, and locks) |
| MP - Media Protection | Solution provider must implement policies and procedures that govern the receipt and removal of hardware and electronic media that contain county of San Diego electronic protected health information into and out of a facility, and the movement of these items within the facility |
| MP - Media Protection | Solution provider must implement policies and procedures to address the final disposition of county of San Diego electronic protected health information and/or the hardware or electronic media on which it is stored |
| MP - Media Protection | Solution provider must implement procedures for removal of county of San Diego electronic protected health information from electronic media before the media are made available for reuse. |
| MP - Media Protection | Solution provider must maintain a record of the movements of hardware and electronic media and any person responsible therefore |
| PE - Physical and Environmental Protection | Solution provider must implement policies and procedures to limit physical access to County of San Diego electronic information systems and the facility or facilities in which they are housed, while ensuring that properly authorized access is allowed |
| PE - Physical and Environmental Protection | Solution provider must implement procedures to control and validate a person's access to facilities based on their role or function, including visitor control, and control of access to software programs for testing and revision |
| PS - Personnel Security | Solution provider must implement procedures to determine the physical access of a workforce member to county of San Diego electronic protected health information is appropriate |
| PS - Personnel Security | Solution provider must implement procedures for terminating access to County of San Diego electronic protected health information when the employment of a workforce member ends or as required by determinations made |
| PL - Planning | Solution provider must implement policies and procedures to safeguard the facility and the equipment therein from unauthorized physical access, tampering, and theft |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provider must perform Penetration Testing annually |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provider must implement policies and procedures to prevent, detect, contain, and correct security violations |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provider must conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic protected health information held by the covered entity or hybrid entity |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provider risk assessment procedures must assign a likelihood and impact for relevant threats and vulnerabilities assign a risk rating for relevant threats and vulnerabilities. |
| RA - Risk Assessments | Solution provider must implement security measures sufficient to reduce risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable and appropriate level to comply with §164.306(a) |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution provider must implement electronic mechanisms to corroborate that electronic protected health information has not been altered or destroyed in an unauthorized manner |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution provider must implement technical security measures to guard against unauthorized access to electronic protected health information that is being transmitted over an electronic communications network |
| SC - System and Communications Protection | Solution provider must implement a mechanism to encrypt county of San Diego electronic protected health information in transit and at rest to meet at least the minimum NIST standards |
| SI - System and Information Integrity | Solution must detect, prevent and report malicious software use |
FTI
| County of San Diego FTI Security Requirements Checklist | ||||
| Control Section | Requirement | Yes | No | Exception Explanation |
| 4.1 AC - Access Control | AC-2 Account Management |
a. Define and document the types of accounts allowed and specifically prohibited for use within the system;
b. Assign account managers;
c. Require conditions for group and role membership;
d. Specify:
1. Authorized users of the system;
2. Group and role membership; and
3. Access authorizations (i.e., privileges) and other attributes (as required) for each account.
e. Require approvals by the system owner or designated representative for requests to create accounts;
f. Create, enable, modify, disable and remove accounts in accordance with agency account management procedures prerequisites;
g. Monitor the use of accounts;
h. Notify account managers and designated agency official within:
1. 24 hours when accounts are no longer required;
2. 24 hours when users are terminated or transferred; and
3. 24 hours when system usage or need-to-know changes for an individual;
i. Authorize access to the system based on:
1. A valid access authorization;
2. Intended system usage; and
3. Under the authority to re-disclosed FTI under the provisions of IRC § 6103;
j. Review accounts for compliance with account management requirements annually for user account and semi-annually for privileged accounts;
k. Establish and implement a process for changing shared or group account authenticators (if deployed) when individuals are removed from the group; and
l. Align account management processes with personnel termination and transfer processes.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-3 Access Enforcement
Enforce approved authorizations for logical access to information and system resources in accordance with applicable access control policies.
(IRS-Defined): Users having accounts with administrator access privileges may access those accounts only from agency-owned or authorized contractor systems.
Supplemental Guidance: A key intent is to prohibit personally-owned or public kiosk (e.g., library) systems from being used for remote administrator access. If individuals with administrator rights require email or Internet access beyond local boundaries, one alternative would be to issue separate, non-privileged accounts (one per affected individual) for that purpose. For the considerations of this section, administrator accounts/rights are those that allow for the installation or configuration of software on agency assets receiving, processing, storing, accessing, protecting and/or transmitting FTI.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
Enforce approved authorization for controlling the flow of information within the system and between interconnected systems based on the technical safeguards in place to protect FTI
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-5 Separation of Duties
a. Identify and document separate duties of individuals to prevent harmful activity without collusion; and
b. Define system access authorizations to support separation of duties.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-6 Least Privilege
Employ the principle of least privilege, allowing only authorized accesses for users (or processes acting on behalf of users) that are necessary to accomplish assigned organizational tasks.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-7: Unsuccessful Logon Attempts
a. Enforce a limit of three (3) consecutive invalid logon attempts by a user during a 120-minute period; and
b. Automatically lock the account for 15 minutes or until released by an administrator when the maximum number of unsuccessful attempts is exceeded.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-8: System Use Notification
a. Display a warning banner to users before granting access to the system that provides privacy and security notices consistent with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines and state that:
1. Users are accessing a U.S. Government System;
2. System usage may be monitored, recorded, and subject to audit;
3. Unauthorized use of the system is prohibited and subject to criminal and civil penalties; and
4. Use of the system indicates consent to monitoring and recording;
b. Retain the notification message or banner on the screen until users acknowledge the usage conditions and take explicit actions to log on to or further access the system; and
c. For publicly accessible systems:
1. Display system use information warning banner before granting further access to the publicly accessible system;
2. Display references, if any, to monitoring, recording, or auditing that are consistent with privacy accommodations for such systems that generally prohibit those activities and
3. Include a description of the authorized uses of the system.
Supplemental Guidance: The warning banner must be applied at the application, database, operating system, and network device levels for all systems that receive, process, store, or transmit FTI.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-11: Device Lock
a. Prevent further access to the system by initiating a device lock after 15 minutes of inactivity; requiring the user to initiate a device lock before leaving the system unattended; and
b. Retain the device lock until the user reestablishes access using established identification and authentication procedures.
Supplemental Guidance: Device locks are temporary actions taken to prevent logical access to organizational systems when users stop work and move away from the immediate vicinity of those systems but do not want to log out because of the temporary nature of their absences. Device locks are implemented where session activities can be determined. This is typically at the operating system level but can also be at the application level. Device locks are not an acceptable substitute for logging out of systems, for example, if organizations require users to log out at the end of workdays.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-12: Session Termination
Automatically terminate a user session after 30 minutes of inactivity.
Supplemental Guidance: This control addresses the termination of user-initiated logical sessions in contrast to SC-10 which addresses the termination of network connections that are associated with communications sessions (i.e., network disconnect). A logical session (for local, network and remote access) is initiated whenever a user (or process acting on behalf of a user) accesses an agency system. Such user sessions can be terminated without terminating network sessions. Session termination terminates all processes associated with a user’s logical session except those processes that are specifically created by the user (i.e., session owner) to continue after the session is terminated. Conditions or trigger events requiring automatic session termination can include, for example, organization-defined periods of user inactivity, targeted responses to certain types of incidents, time-ofday restrictions on system use.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-14: Permitted Actions Without Identification or Authentication
a. Identify specific user actions that can be performed on the system without identification or authentication consistent with organizational mission and business functions and
b. Document and provide supporting rationale in the security plan for the system, user actions not requiring identification or authentication.
Supplemental Guidance: This control addresses situations in which agencies determine that no identification or authentication is required in agency systems. Agencies may allow a limited number of user actions without identification or authentication including, for example, when individuals access public websites. Access to FTI without identification and authentication is strictly prohibited.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-17: Remote Access
a. Establish and document usage restrictions, configuration/connection requirements and implementation guidance for each type of remote access allowed; and
b. Authorize each type of remote access to the system prior to allowing such connections.
Supplemental Guidance: Remote access is access to agency systems (or processes acting on behalf of users) communicating through external networks such as the Internet. Remote access methods include, for example, dial-up, broadband, and wireless. Remote access controls apply to systems other than public web servers or systems designed for public access. Any remote access where (i) FTI is accessed or (ii) an FTI environment is administered over the remote connection must be performed using multifactor authentication. Requirements of multifactor authentication are provided in NIST Control IA-2: Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users).
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-18: Wireless Access
1. Establish configuration requirements, connection requirements, and implementation guidance for each type of wireless access; and
2. Authorize each type of wireless access to the system prior to allowing such connections
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-19: Access Control for Mobile Devices
a. Establish configuration requirements, connection requirements and implementation guidance for organization-controlled mobile devices to include when such devices are outside of controlled areas; and
b. Authorize the connection of mobile devices to organizational systems.
Supplemental Guidance: A mobile device is considered a computing device that has a small form factor such that it can easily be carried by a single individual; is designed to operate without a physical connection; possesses local, non-removable or removable data storage; and includes a self-contained power source. Mobile device requirements are not applicable to laptop computers.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-20: Use of External Systems
a. Establish terms and conditions, consistent with the trust relationships established with other organizations owning, operating and/or maintaining external systems, allowing authorized individuals to:
1. Access the system from external systems; and
2. Process, store, or transmit organization-controlled information using external systems; or
b. Prohibit the use of non-agency managed external systems.
Supplemental Guidance: External information systems, or non-agency-owned equipment, include any technology used to receive, process, store, access, protect and/or transmit FTI that is not owned and managed by 1) the agency or the agency-run mobile device management system, 2) a state's consolidated IT office, 3) one of the agency's approved contractors or sub-contractors (e.g., print vendors, collections agencies, application development contractors, network engineers at a state consolidated IT office, etc.) or 4) one of the agency's constituent counties. To ensure a third-party contractor system is not considered an external information system, the agency must include Exhibit 7 language in its contract with the service provider. Examples of external information systems include but are not limited to: 1) personally-owned devices, which includes any device owned by an individual employee, rather than the agency itself; and 2) devices owned and managed by agency stakeholders that do not have proper approvals to receive, process, store, access, protect and/or transmit FTI.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-21: Information Sharing
a. Enable authorized users to determine whether access authorizations assigned to a sharing partner match the information’s access and use restrictions for information sharing circumstances where user discretion is required and permitted by IRC § 6103; and
b. Employ automated mechanisms or manual processes compliant with IRC § 6103 to assist users in making information sharing and collaboration decisions.
Supplemental Guidance: The agency must restrict the sharing/re-disclosure of FTI to only those authorized in IRC § 6103 and as approved by the Office of Safeguards.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-22: Publicly Accessible Content
a. Designate individuals authorized to make information publicly accessible;
b. Train authorized individuals to ensure that publicly accessible information does not contain nonpublic information;
c. Review the proposed content of information prior to posting onto the publicly accessible system to ensure that nonpublic information is not included; and
d. Review the content on the publicly accessible system for nonpublic information at a minimum quarterly and remove such information, if discovered.
Supplemental Guidance: FTI is considered nonpublic information and may never be posted or shared on a publicly accessible system.
4.1 AC - Access Control AC-23: Data Mining Protection
Employ agency-defined data mining prevention and detection techniques for agency-defined data storage objects to detect and protect against unauthorized data mining.
4.2 AT - Awareness and Training AT-2: Awareness Training
a. Provide security and privacy literacy training to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors):
1. As part of initial training for new users and annually thereafter; and
2. When required by system changes or following assessment or audit findings, security or privacy incidents, or changes in applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines;
b. Employ the following techniques to increase the security and privacy awareness of system users by providing one or more short ad hoc sessions and include topical information on recent attack schemes, changes to organizational security and privacy policies, revised security and privacy expectations, or a subset of topics from the initial training.
c. Update literacy training and awareness content annually and following system changes and
d. Incorporate lessons learned from internal or external security or privacy incidents into literacy training and awareness techniques.
4.2 AT - Awareness and Training AT-3: Role-Based Training
a. Provide role-based security and privacy training to personnel with the following roles and responsibilities: information system security manager (ISSM); information system security officer (ISSO); security specialist; system and software developers; system, network and database administrators; programmer/systems analyst; and personnel having access to FTI
1. Before authorizing access to the system, information, or performing assigned duties, and annually thereafter; and
2. When required by system changes;
b. Update role-based training content annually and following system changes and Update literacy training and awareness content annually and following system changes; and
c. Incorporate lessons learned from internal or external security or privacy incidents into role-based training.
Supplemental Guidance: Agencies may determine the appropriate content of security and privacy training based on the assigned roles and responsibilities of individuals and the specific security and privacy requirements of organizations and the systems to which personnel have authorized access, including security-related technical training specifically tailored for assigned duties. Additional roles that may require role-based security and privacy training include, for example, system owners; authorizing officials; system security officers; privacy officers; enterprise architects; acquisition and procurement officials; systems engineers; personnel conducting configuration management activities; personnel performing verification and validation activities; auditors; personnel having access to system-level software; security and privacy control assessors; personnel with contingency planning and incident response duties; and personnel with privacy management responsibilities.
4.2 AT - Awareness and Training AT-4: Training Records
a. Document and monitor information security and privacy training activities, including security and privacy awareness training and specific role-based security and privacy training; and
b. Retain individual training records for a period of five (5) years
4.2 AT - Awareness and Training AT-6: Training Feedback
Provide feedback on organizational training results to the following personnel: Agency Senior Management and Agency Disclosure Personnel on an annual basis.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-2: Audit Events
a. Identify the types of events that the system is capable of logging in support of the audit function:
1. All accesses or attempts to access an FTI system, including the identity of each user and device;
2. Logoff activities;
3. Activities that might modify, bypass, or negate IT security safeguards;
4. Security-relevant actions associated with processing FTI;
5. User generation of reports and extracts containing FTI;
6. Any interaction with FTI through an application;
7. Password changes;
8. Creation or modification of groups;
9. Privileged user actions;
10. Access to the system;
11. Creating and deleting files;
12. Change of permissions or privileges;
13. Command line changes and queries;
14. Changes made to an application or database;
15. System and data interactions;
16. Opening and/or closing of files; and
17. Program execution activities.
b. Coordinate the event logging function with other organizational entities requiring audit related information to guide and inform the selection criteria for events to be logged;
c. Specify the following event types for logging within the system: agency-defined subset of AU-2a requirements (e.g. Systems capable of required event types relevant to the use or administration of FTI);
d. Provide a rationale for why the event types selected for logging are deemed to be adequate to support after-the-fact investigations of incidents; and
e. Review and update the event types selected for logging annually or when there is a system change. Document changes in the SSR.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-3: Content of Audit Records Ensure that audit records contain information that establishes the following:
a. What type of event occurred;
b. When the event occurred;
c. Where the event occurred;
d. Source of the event;
e. Outcome of the event; and
f. Identity of any individuals, subjects, or objects/entities associated with the event
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-4: Audit Storage Capacity Allocate audit log storage capacity to accommodate the retention of audit records for the retention period.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-5: Response to Audit Processing Failures
a. Alert designated organizational officials (e.g., SA, ISSO) in the event of an audit processing failure; and
b. Take the following additional actions:
1. Monitor system operational status using operating system or system audit logs and verify functions and performance of the system. operating system or system audit logs and verify functions and performance of the system. Logs shall be able to identify where system process failures have taken place and provide information relative to corrective actions to be taken by the system administrator
2. If logs are not available, shut down the system.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-6: Audit Review, Analysis and Reporting
a. Review and analyze system audit records weekly for indications of inappropriate or unusual activity and the potential impact of the inappropriate or unusual activity;
b. Report findings to the individual(s) specified within the agency’s incident response procedures; and
c. Adjust the level of audit record review, analysis, and reporting within the system when there is a change in risk based on law enforcement information, intelligence information, or other credible sources of information.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-7: Audit Reduction and Report Generation Provide and implement an audit record reduction and report generation capability that:
a. Supports on-demand audit record review, analysis, and reporting requirements and after-the-fact investigations of incidents; and
b. Does not alter the original content or time ordering of audit records.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-8: Time Stamps
a. Use internal system clocks to generate time stamps for audit records; and
b. Record time stamps for audit records that meet agency-defined granularity and that use Coordinated Universal Time, have a fixed local time offset from Coordinated Universal Time, or that include the local time offset as part of the time stamp.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-9: Protection of Audit Information
a. Protect audit information and audit logging tools from unauthorized access, modification, and deletion; and
b. Alert ISSO upon detection of unauthorized access, modification, or deletion of audit information.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-11: Audit Record Retention Retain audit records seven (7) years to provide support for after-the-fact investigations of incidents and to meet regulatory and organizational information retention requirements.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-12: Audit Generation
a. Provide audit record generation capability for the event types the system is capable of auditing as defined in AU-2a on all systems that receive, process, store, access, protect and/or transmit FTI;
b. Allow SA and ISSO to select the event types that are to be logged by specific components of the system; and
c. Generate audit records for the event types defined in AU-2c that include the audit record content defined in AU-3.
4.3 AU - Audit and Accountability AU-16: Cross-Organizational Auditing Logging Employ agency-defined methods for coordinating agency-defined audit information among external organizations when audit information is transmitted across organizational boundaries.
Supplemental Guidance: This requirement applies to consolidated and outsourced data centers, thirdparty vendors, and/or cloud providers handling FTI. When agencies use systems and/or services of external organizations, the auditing capability necessitates a coordinated approach across organizations. For example, maintaining the identity of individuals that requested specific services across organizational boundaries may often be very difficult, and doing so may prove to have significant performance and privacy ramifications. Therefore, it is often the case that cross-organizational auditing simply captures the identity of individuals issuing requests at the initial system, and subsequent systems record that the requests emanated from authorized individuals.
4.4 CA - Assessment, Authorization and Monitoring CA-2: Control Assessments
a. Select the appropriate assessor or assessment team for the type of assessment to be conducted;
b. Develop a control assessment plan that describes the scope of the assessment including:
1. Controls and control enhancements under assessment;
2. Assessment procedures to be used to determine control effectiveness; and
3. Assessment environment, assessment team, and assessment roles and responsibilities;
c. Ensure the control assessment plan is reviewed and approved by the authorizing official or designated representative prior to conducting the assessment;
d. Assess the controls in the system and its environment of operation annually to determine the extent to which the controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended, and producing the desired outcome with respect to meeting established security and privacy requirements;
e. Produce a control assessment report that document the results of the assessment; and
f. Provide the results of the control assessment to agency’s Authorizing Official (AO) or the Authorizing Official Designated Representative.
4.4 CA - Assessment, Authorization and Monitoring CA-3: Information Exchange
a. Approve and manage the exchange of information between the system and other systems using Interconnection Security Agreements (ISAs).
b. Document, as part of each exchange agreement, the interface characteristics, security and privacy requirements, controls, and responsibilities for each system, and the impact level of the information communicated; and
c. Review and update the system interconnection on an annual basis.
Supplemental Guidance: This control applies to dedicated connections between two or more separate systems and does not apply to transitory, user-controlled connections such as email and website browsing. Interconnected systems falling under the same FTI environment, or authorization boundary, do not require a formal Interconnection Security Agreement.
4.4 CA - Assessment, Authorization and Monitoring CA-5: Plan of Action and Milestones
a. Develop a plan of action and milestones for the system to document the planned remediation actions of the agency to correct weaknesses or deficiencies noted during the assessment of the controls and to reduce or eliminate known vulnerabilities in the system; and
b. Update existing plan of action and milestones on a quarterly basis, at a minimum, based on the findings from control assessments, independent audits or reviews, and continuous monitoring activities.
Supplemental Guidance: The POA&M must be comprised of an all-inclusive tool or document for the agency to track vulnerabilities identified by the self-assessments, internal inspections, external audits and any other vulnerabilities identified for information systems that receive, process, store, access, protect and/or transmit FTI.
4.4 CA - Assessment, Authorization and Monitoring CA-6: Authorization
a. Assign a senior official as the authorizing official for the system;
b. Assign a senior official as the authorizing official for common controls available for inheritance by organizational systems;
c. Ensure that the authorizing official for the system, before commencing operations:
1. Accepts the use of common controls inherited by the system; and
2. Authorizes the system to operate;
d. Ensure that the authorizing official for common controls authorizes the use of those controls for inheritance by organizational systems;
e. Update the authorizations whenever there is a significant change to the system, or every three (3) years, whichever occurs first.
Supplemental Guidance: Authorizations are official management decisions by senior officials to authorize operation of systems and to explicitly accept the risk to agency operations and assets, individuals and other agencies based on the implementation of agreed-upon security and privacy controls. Authorizing officials provide budgetary oversight for agency systems or assume responsibility for the mission and business operations supported by those systems. Authorizing officials are responsible and accountable for security and privacy risks associated with the operation and use of agency systems. The authorization comes in the form of a memorandum signed by an agency official with fiduciary control over the security control implementation within the system. Agencies may choose to perform authorizations at the agency level (i.e., authorize all systems that receive, process, store, access, protect and/or transmit FTI at once) or at the system level (i.e., create a memo for each application and supporting infrastructure that receives, processes, stores, accesses, protects and/or transmits FTI). Authorization memos should come after processes where security controls are selected and assessed and should incorporate robust risk management processes to identify, mitigate and reduce risk to an acceptable level. Agencies may conduct ongoing authorizations of systems by implementing continuous monitoring programs. Robust continuous monitoring programs reduce the need for separate reauthorization processes.
4.4 CA - Assessment, Authorization and Monitoring CA-7: Continuous Monitoring Develop a system-level continuous monitoring strategy and implement continuous monitoring in accordance with the organization-level continuous monitoring strategy that includes:
a. Establish agency-defined metrics to be monitored;
b. Establish agency-defined frequencies (no less than annually) for monitoring and agency-defined frequencies (no less than annually) for ongoing assessment of security and privacy control effectiveness;
c. Ongoing control assessments in accordance with the continuous monitoring strategy;
d. Ongoing monitoring of system and organization-defined metrics in accordance with the continuous monitoring strategy;
e. Correlation and analysis of information generated by control assessments and monitoring;
f. Response actions to address results of the analysis of control assessment and monitoring information; and
g. Reporting the security and privacy status of the system to agency-defined personnel annually, at a minimum.
4.4 CA - Assessment, Authorization and Monitoring CA-7: Continuous Monitoring Control Enhancements (CE-1) Independent Assessors: Employ independent assessors or assessment teams to monitor the controls in the system on an ongoing basis.
Supplemental Guidance: Agencies can maximize the value of control assessments during the continuous monitoring process by requiring that assessments be conducted by assessors with…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .