CN-550000-CA835-W0010000.pdf

PDF 772 KB Posted

Attached to
Master Agreement FL|CAN55|7efbf1004dfb9789e0b86817ae4560e0
Contract number
CAN55
Issued by
Florida

About this file

This document is a Task Work Order for Professional Services issued by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to Pegasus Engineering, LLC, located in Winter Springs, FL. The contract involves professional engineering and design services, with Gene Varano serving as the FDOT Project Manager and Dana Stewart as the Construction Manager.

The task work order authorizes Pegasus Engineering to provide design services for resurfacing State Road 5 from Post Road to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway), with a total contract value of $577,234.54. Compensation is structured through multiple elements, including lump sum payments based on percentage of completion and units worked at loaded billing rates. The contract's specific service elements include design services, utilities, environmental permitting, survey services, and basic design services. The work is to be completed by the specified date, with the contract explicitly noting that an independent assessment has verified the staff hours and quantities as fair, reasonable, and competitive.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
CN-550000-CAN55.pdf PDF
CN-550000-CAN55-00050000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-CAN55-W0020000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-CAN55-W0030000.pdf PDF
ContractBudgetExport.csv CSV file
CN-550000-CAN55-00030000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-CAN55-W0010000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-CAN55-00020000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-CAN55-00040000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-CAN55-00060000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-CAN55-W0030100.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TASK WORK ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

375-030-25

PROCUREMENT

06/17

Consultant:

Address:

Date:

8/18/2022

*Limiting or Estimating/Budgeted Amount.

Distribution:

Consultant Acceptance:

Estimate

Signature

FDOT/Pegasus

MGRM

$577,234.54

$0.00

(name) (title)

Fursan Munjed, PE

$577,234.54

Total authorizations to date (including this one):

Departmental Approval:

$391,393.19 Limit

Design Services Public Engagement - QCA $4,865.96 Limit

Geotechnical Servies - GEC

The Consultant will provide Design Services on SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway), as stated in attached Scope of Services.

FDOT PM: Gene Varano FDOT CM: Dana Stewart

$22,897.07

Pegasus Engineering, LLC

301 West SR 434

Suite 309

Winter Springs, FL 32708

(To be entered upon execution of T.W.O.)

Brief Task Description:

In accordance with the above referenced contract, you are authorized to perform the tasks detailed in attached Exhibit A (Scope of Services).

Compensation elements are as follows:

Element Description Amount Estimate/LimitMethod of Compensation

The total amount or the limiting amount of the compensation will be:

All services required under this Task Work Order will be completed on or before:

$577,234.54

(LS2) Lump sum paid based on % of completion

(LS2) Lump sum paid based on % of completion

(LA4) Units worked at loaded billing rates in Table 6

Page 1 Total

Page 2 thru 6 Subtotal

Total

(LS2) Lump sum paid based on % of completion

(LS2) Lump sum paid based on % of completion

(LA4) Units worked at loaded billing rates in Table 6

(LA4) Units worked at loaded billing rates in Table 6

Design Services Utilities - BPA

Design Services Enviro Permitting - E Sciences

Survey Services - ECHO - Authorized

Survey Services - ECHO - Unauthorized

Design Basic Services - Pegasus

$12,398.80

Limit

Limit

Estimate

Estimate

$18,007.28

$11,416.99

$116,255.25

$577,234.54

(name) (title) Signature

Suzanne Phillips, PE DCPME

Other Notes:

An independent assessment of the staff hours and quantities for the proposed services has been performed, and found to be fair, reasonable, and competitive.

Task Work Order No.:

Contract No.: Payment FM No.:

445215-1-32-01CA835

.93<2658 /8=479;4 1.+ //#0-%0'")$$'"&0&0")(.,"**'($#%(/$&-

Stage III Scope Page A-1 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

July 27, 2020

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

FOR

Financial Project ID: 445215-1-32-01

DISTRICT 5

BREAVRD COUNTY

Stage III Scope Page A-2 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

Table of Content

1 PURPOSE

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

3 PROJECT COMMON AND PROJECT GENERAL TASKS

4 ROADWAY ANALYSIS

5 ROADWAY PLANS

6a DRAINAGE ANALYSIS

6b DRAINAGE PLANS

7 UTILITIES

8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS and ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES

9 STRUCTURES - SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS TASKS AND DRAWINGS

10 STRUCTURES - BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REPORT

11 STRUCTURES - TEMPORARY BRIDGE

12 STRUCTURES - SHORT SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE

13 STRUCTURES - MEDIUM SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE

14 STRUCTURES - STRUCTURAL STEEL BRIDGE

15 STRUCTURES - SEGMENTAL CONCRETE BRIDGE

16 STRUCTURES - MOVABLE SPAN

17 STRUCTURES - RETAINING WALLS

18 STRUCTURES - MISCELLANEOUS

19 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING ANALYSIS

20 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS

21 SIGNALIZATION ANALYSIS

22 SIGNALIZATION PLANS

23 LIGHTING ANALYSIS

24 LIGHTING PLANS

25 LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS

26 LANDSCAPE PLANS

27 SURVEY

28 PHOTOGRAMMETRY

29 MAPPING

Stage III Scope Page A-3 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

30 TERRESTRIAL MOBILE LiDAR

31 ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT

32 NOISE BARRIERS IMPACT DESIGN ASSESSMENT IN THE DESIGN PHASE

33 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

34 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANS

35 GEOTECHNICAL

36 3D MODELING

37 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS

38 INVOICING LIMITS

Stage III Scope Page A-4 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES

HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE/STRUCTURAL DESIGN

This Exhibit forms an integral part of the agreement between the State of Florida Department of

Transportation (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT or FDOT) and Pegasus

Engineering, LLC (hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT) relative to the transportation facility described as follows:

Financial Project ID: 445215-1-32-01

Federal Aid Project No.: N/A

County Section No. 70020

Project Description: SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Road (MP 7.278) to Miller Cove Road

(MP 8.929), and Fiber Optic Communication Line from Lake Washington Road (MP

5.479) to Post Road (MP 7.249).

Bridge No(s).: N/A

Railroad Crossing No.: N/A

Context Classification: C3C Suburban Commercial

1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this Exhibit is to describe the scope of work and the responsibilities of the

CONSULTANT and the DEPARTMENT in connection with the design and preparation of a complete set of construction contract documents and incidental engineering services, as necessary, for improvements to the transportation facility described herein.

Major work mix includes: Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation

Major work groups include: 3.1

Minor work groups include: 6.2, 6.3.1, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.1, 8.2, 9.1 & 9.2

Known alternative contracting methods include: N/A

The general objective is for the CONSULTANT to prepare a set of contract documents including plans, specifications, supporting engineering analysis, calculations and other technical documents in accordance with FDOT policy, procedures and requirements. These Contract documents will be used by the contractor to build the project and test the project components.

These Contract documents will be used by the DEPARTMENT or its Construction Engineering

Inspection (CEI) representatives for inspection and final acceptance of the project. The

Stage III Scope Page A-5 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

CONSULTANT shall follow a systems engineering process to ensure that all required project components are included in the development of the Contract documents and the project can be built as designed and to specifications.

The Scope of Services establishes which items of work in the FDOT Design Manual and other pertinent manuals are specifically prescribed to accomplish the work included in this contract, and also indicate which items of work will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT and/or the

DEPARTMENT.

The CONSULTANT shall be aware that as a project is developed, certain modifications and/or improvements to the original concepts may be required. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate these refinements into the design and consider such refinements to be an anticipated and integral part of the work. This shall not be a basis for any supplemental fee request(s).

The CONSULTANT shall demonstrate good project management practices while working on this project. These include communication with the DEPARTMENT and others as necessary, management of time and resources, and documentation. The CONSULTANT shall set up and maintain throughout the design of the project a contract file in accordance with DEPARTMENT procedures. CONSULTANTs are expected to know the laws and rules governing their professions and are expected to provide services in accordance with current regulations, codes and ordinances and recognized standards applicable to such professional services. The Consultant shall provide qualified technical and professional personnel to perform to Department standards and procedures, the duties and responsibilities assigned under the terms of this agreement. The

Consultant shall minimize to the maximum extent possible the Department's need to apply its own resources to assignments authorized by the Department.

The DEPARTMENT will provide contract administration, management services, and technical reviews of all work associated with the development and preparation of contract documents, including Construction documents. The Department's technical reviews are for high-level conformance and are not meant to be comprehensive reviews. The CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible for all work performed and work products developed under this Scope of Services.

The DEPARTMENT may provide job-specific information and/or functions as outlined in this contract, if favorable.

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The CONSULTANT shall investigate the status of the project and become familiar with concepts and commitments (typical sections, alignments, etc.) developed from prior studies and/or activities. If a Preliminary Engineering Report is available from a prior or current Project

Development and Environment (PD&E) study, the CONSULTANT shall use the approved concepts as a basis for the design unless otherwise directed by the DEPARTMENT.

Stage III Scope Page A-6 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

The purpose of the project is to rehabilitate the asphalt pavement to extend the service life of the existing roadway, including necessary roadside improvements, in accordance with FDOT

Design Manual Section 114. The nature of the project is asphalt resurfacing and associated safety and functional improvements. The project is based on a request from the FDOT, District

5 Pavement Management\Maintenance Office for a RRR review of Roadway 70020-000 from

MP 7.249 to MP 8.929. The begin project limit has been adjusted to MP 7.278 to provide a pedestrian crosswalk. The end project limit has been adjusted to MP 8.929. The project also includes signal interconnect from Lake Washington Road (MP 5.479) to Post Road (MP

7.249).

2.1 Project General and Roadway (Activities 3, 4, and 5)

Public Involvement: PEP level 2

Other Agency Presentations/Meetings: One (1) meeting with the County and one (1) meeting with the City.

Joint Project Agreements: Lighting with Power Company.

Specification Package Preparation: Standard Specifications Workbook and Final Specifications

Package Preparation.

Value Engineering: N/A

Risk Assessment Workshop: One meeting with FDOT.

Plan Type: Plan

Typical Section: 2 Typical Sections:

1) MP 7.278 to 7.526: Six 11-ft travel lanes (three per direction), 10-ft outside village swale paved shoulder, 5-ft sidewalk (both directions) and a 30-ft raised median with type E curb and gutter. No changes are proposed.

2) MP 7.526 to 8.929: Six 12-ft travel lanes (three per direction), 4-ft inside paved shoulder, 10-ft outside village swale paved shoulder, 5-ft sidewalk (both directions) and a 30-ft raised median with type E curb and gutter. No changes are proposed.

Pavement Designs: Five (5) Pavement Designs – (1) Travel lanes; (2) Shoulders; (3) Turn lanes; (4) Median openings; and (5) U-turn apron.

Pavement Type Selection Report(s): N/A

Cross-Slope Correction: 2 Locations – Southbound MP 7.571 to MP 7.817, and MP 8.063 to

MP 8.348

Stage III Scope Page A-7 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

Access Management Classification: 3

Transit Route Features: N/A

Major Intersections and Interchanges: Post Road.

Roadway Alternative Analysis: N/A

Level of Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP): Level 1 for Milling & Resurfacing, and Level

1 for gravity wall, sidewalks, and drainage inlets

Temporary Lighting: N/A

Temporary Signals: N/A

Temporary Drainage: N/A

Back of Sidewalk Profiles: N/A

Selective Clearing and Grubbing: N/A

2.2 Drainage (Activities 6a and 6b)

System Type: Three (3) new inlets.

2.3 Utilities Coordination (Activity 7)

The CONSULTANT is responsible to certify that all necessary arrangements for utility work on this project have been made and will not conflict with the physical construction schedule. The

CONSULTANT should coordinate with DEPARTMENT personnel to coordinate transmittals to

Utility Companies and meet production schedules.

The CONSULTANT shall ensure FDOT standards, policies, procedures, practices, and design criteria are followed concerning utility coordination.

The CONSULTANT may employ more than one individual or utility engineering consultant to provide utility coordination and engineering design expertise. The CONSULTANT shall identify a dedicated person responsible for managing all utility coordination activities. This person shall be contractually referred to as the Utility Coordination Manager and shall be identified in the

CONSULTANT proposal. The Utility Coordination Manager shall be required to satisfactorily demonstrate to the FDOT District Utilities Administrator that they have the following knowledge, skills, and expertise:

A minimum of 4 years of experience performing utility coordination in accordance with FDOT, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and American Association of State Highway and

Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards, policies, and procedures.

Stage III Scope Page A-8 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

A thorough knowledge of the FDOT plans production process and District utility coordination process.

A thorough knowledge of FDOT agreements, standards, policies, and procedures.

The Utility Coordination Manager shall be responsible for managing all utility coordination, including the following:

Assuring that Utility Coordination and accommodation is in accordance to the FDOT, FHWA, and AASHTO standards, policies, procedures, and design criteria.

Assisting the engineer of record in identifying all existing utilities and coordinating any new installations. Assisting the Engineer of Record with resolving utility conflicts.

Scheduling and performing utility coordination meetings, keeping and distribution of minutes/action items of all utility meetings, and ensuring expedient follow-up on all unresolved issues.

Distributing all plans, conflict matrixes and changes to affected utility owners and making sure this information is properly coordinated and documented.

Identifying and coordinating the completion of any FDOT or utility owner agreement that is required for reimbursement, or accommodation of the utility facilities associated with the project.

Review and certify to the District Utilities Administrator that all Utility Work Schedules are correct and in accordance with the Department’s standards, policies, and procedures.

Prepare, review and process all utility related reimbursable paperwork inclusive of betterment and salvage determination.

The CONSULTANT’s utility coordination work shall be performed and directed by the Utility

Coordination Manager that was identified and approved by FDOT’s Project Manager. Any proposed change of the approved Utility Coordination Manager shall be subject to review and approval by FDOT’s Project Manager prior to any change being made in this contract.

2.4 Environmental Permits and Environmental Clearances (Activity 8)

Coordinate with FDOT, submitting a permit determination letter to the Environmental Permits

Office, Attention District Five Permits Coordinator, for review and concurrence during the design process, considering the below descriptions of work and conditions.

This project is anticipated to exceed one acre of soil disturbing activities and will require NPDES coverage under the FDEP Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small

Construction Activities.

Stage III Scope Page A-9 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

Complete an environmental assessment: Records indicate that rare species or suitable habitat may exist within or near the project limits. The following species were noted as potentially or likely occurring that may require additional environmental surveys; Florida Scrub-Jay, West Indian

Manatee, Hawksbill Sea Turtle, Gopher Tortoise, Florida Sandhill Crane, Red-cockaded

Woodpecker, Wood Stork, and Eastern Indigo Snake.

Wetlands were noted within the Right-of-Way and are not to be impacted. The apparent wetland lines shown on the Concept are from the Florida Geographic Data Library and are for informational purposes only.

There is a Zone A floodplain at MP 7.705 that will cover 0.42 AC. The floodplain is at the Otter

Creek box culvert. Work is limited to milling and resurfacing the existing roadway. No impacts to the floodplain are anticipated. If there are any changes to the scope of work this will need to be coordinated with the FDOT Environmental Permits Office for evaluation to determine if additional documentation is required.

2.5 Structures (Activities 9 - 18) – N/A

2.6 Signing and Pavement Markings (Activities 19 & 20)

Signing and Pavement Marking shall be completed for the project limits. All mainline signing within the project limits shall be inventoried. Any existing signs that conflict with the proposed pavement markings shall be addressed in the plans. Provide striping at all pedestrian crosswalks irrespective of milling limits. This project qualifies for lane departure mitigation thru application of Audible and Vibratory Treatment based on the posted speed equal or greater than 50 mph and flush shoulder typical section, see Usage Criteria per FDM Section 210.4.6. Provide channelizing edge lines on the approach sides of shoulder inlets (galvanized reticuline grates).

Match pavement markings south of Post Rd for corridor consistency.

2.7 Signalization (Activities 21 & 22)

Post Road: Signal detection shall be reestablished, add pedestrian signals for the new crosswalk at Post Road, update signal clearance timings, and add fiber optic interconnect from Lake

Washington Road to Post Road.

Count Station: PTMS 700233 restore detection and reconstruct cabinet.

2.8 Lighting (Activities 23 & 24)

MP 7.278 (Post Rd): Intersection lighting exists. New poles may be limited by right of way, overhead utilities, and lateral offset. Complete design to improve lighting per retrofit criteria.

MP 8.688 LT: The light pole is located within the 4-ft clear deflection envelope behind the guardrail and is to be relocated.

Stage III Scope Page A-10 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

2.9 Landscape (Activities 25 & 26) – N/A

2.10 Survey (Activity 27)

Design Survey: Obtain design survey for the locations shown in the survey exhibits.

2.11 Photogrammetry (Activity 28) – N/A

2.12 Mapping (Activity 29) – N/A

2.13 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR (Activity 30) – N/A

2.14 Architecture (Activity 31) – N/A

2.15 Noise Barriers (Activity 32) – N/A

2.16 Intelligent Transportation Systems (Activities 33 & 34) – N/A

2.17 Geotechnical (Activity 35)

Perform borings for the proposed gravity wall location.

2.18 3D Modeling (Activity 36)

2.19 Project Schedule

Within ten (10) days after the Notice-To-Proceed, and prior to the CONSULTANT beginning work, the CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed project activity/event schedule for

DEPARTMENT and CONSULTANT scheduled activities required to meet the current

DEPARTMENT Production Date. The schedule shall be based upon the District Schedule

Information. The current production date is April 1, 2022. The schedule shall be accompanied by an anticipated payout and fiscal progress curve. For the purpose of scheduling, the

CONSULTANT shall allow for a four-week review time for each phase submittal and any other submittals as appropriate.

The schedule shall indicate all required submittals.

All fees and price proposals are to be based on the negotiated schedule of 18 months for final construction contract documents. However, the contract deadline is 60 months from the Notice to Proceed.

Periodically, throughout the life of the contract, the project schedule and payout and fiscal progress curves shall be reviewed and, with the approval of the DEPARTMENT, adjusted as necessary to incorporate changes in the Scope of Services and progress to date.

Stage III Scope Page A-11 FPID: 445215-1-32-01

The approved schedule and schedule status report, along with progress and payout curves, shall be submitted with the monthly progress report.

The schedule shall be submitted in an FDOT system-compatible format.

2.20 Submittals

The CONSULTANT shall furnish construction contract documents as required by the

DEPARTMENT to adequately control, coordinate, and approve the work concepts. The

CONSULTANT shall distribute submittals as directed by the DEPARTMENT. The

DEPARTMENT will determine the specific number of copies required prior to each submittal.

2.21 Provisions for Work

All work shall be prepared with English units in accordance with the latest editions of standards and requirements utilized by the DEPARTMENT which include, but are not limited to, publications such as:

General:

Title 29, Part 1910, Standard 1910.1001, Code of Federal Regulations (29 C.F.R.

1910.1001) - Asbestos Standard for Industry, U.S. Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA)

29 C.F.R. 1926.1101 - Asbestos Standard for Construction, OSHA

40 C.F.R. 61, Subpart M - National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants

(NESHAP), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

40 C.F.R. 763, Subpart E - Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools, EPA

40 C.F.R. 763, Subpart G - Asbestos Worker Protection, EPA

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards for Accessible Design

AASHTO - A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System

AASHTO - Roadside Design Guide

AASHTO - Roadway Lighting Design Guide

AASHTO - A Policy for Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

AASHTO - Highway Safety Manual

Rule Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), Standards of Practice for

Professional Surveyors and Mappers

Chapter 469, Florida Statutes (F.S.) - Asbestos Abatement

Rule Chapter 62-257, F.A.C., Asbestos Program

Rule Chapter 62-302, F.A.C., Surface Water Quality Standards

Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.)

Florida Administrative Codes (F.A.C.)

Chapters 20, 120, 215, 455, Florida Statutes (F.S.) - Florida Department of Business &

Professional Regulations Rules

Name of Consultant Project Information Sheet

Financial Project Identification Number: 445215-1-52-01 N/A

Name of Prime / Subconsultant: Pegasus Engineering, LLC County: Brevard

Project Description: SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway)

Begin Milepost: 1.651 Miles

Number of Lanes: (Urban / Rural / Int.) Lane Configuration: Divided (Divided / Undivided)

Project Type: Minor 3 Roadway Classification: SHS (NHS/FIHS/Off Sys.)

CAP Level: 1, 2 2

Design Variations:

Proposed Design Contract Time: 18 months/days Date of Negotiation: Context Classification: C3C

3. Project Common & Project General Tasks

4. Roadway Analysis

5. Roadway Plans

6a. Drainage Analysis

6b. Drainage Plans

7. Utilities

8. Environmental Permits and Env. Clearances

9. Structures Summary

10. Structures - Bridge Development Report

11. Structures - Temporary Bridge

12. Structures - Short Span Concrete

13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete

14. Structures - Structural Steel

15. Structures - Segmental Concrete

16. Structures - Movable Span

17. Structures - Retaining Walls

18. Structures - Miscellaneous

19. Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis

20. Signing and Pavement Marking Plans

21. Signalization Analysis

22. Signalization Plans

23. Lighting Analysis

24. Lighting Plans

25. Landscape Analysis

26. Landscape Plans

27. Survey

28. Photogrammetry

29. Mapping

30. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR

31. Architecture Development

32. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment

33. Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis

34. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans

35. Geotechnical

36. 3D Modeling

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Brindley Pieters & Associates, Inc. Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Access Management Classification:

2 TTCP Level: Survey Level:

1. Design Exceptions: 1.

Pegasus Engineering, LLC/QCA Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Federal Aid Project Identification Number:

7.278 End Milepost: 8.929 Project Length:

6 Typical Section: Urban

Project Activity:

Estimated By: Negotiated By: (name - firm)

Consultant FDOT Consultant FDOT

2. 2.

3. 3.

4. 4.

5. 5.

(Minor / Major)

E Sciences Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

ECHO, Inc. Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Pegasus Engineering, LLC Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

Enter name & firm Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

GEC, Inc. Enter name & office Enter name & firm Enter name & office

445215-1 Pegasus Final Fees Project Information Page 1 of 63 8/19/2020

Project Staff Hour Summary

Name of Consultant: Pegasus Engineering, LLC

Activity

No.

Activity

Pegasus

Engineering QCA BPA ESI ECHO GEC Sub 6 Sub 7 Sub 8 Sub 9 Sub 10 Sub 11 Sub 12 Total Hours

3 Project Common and General Tasks 247 44 291

4 Roadway Analysis 909 909

5 Roadway Plans 302 302

6a Drainage Analysis 47 47

6b Drainage Plans 78 78

7 Utilities 0 139 139

8 Env. Permits and Env. Clearances 0 95 95

9 Structures - Summary, Misc. Tasks, Dwgs. 0 0

10 BDR 0 0

11 Temporary Bridge 0 0

12 Short Span Concrete Bridge 0 0

13 Medium Span Concrete Bridge 0 0

14 Structural Steel Bridge 0 0

15 Segmental Concrete Bridge 0 0

16 Movable Span 0 0

17 Retaining Walls 0 0

18 Miscellaneous Structures 0 0

19 Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis 307 307

20 Signing & Pavement Marking Plans 96 96

21 Signalization Analysis 240 240

22 Signalization Plans 102 102

23 Lighting Analysis 99 99

24 Lighting Plans 24 24

25 Landscape Analysis 0 0

26 Landscape Plans 0 0

27 Survey - Field and Office Support 0 244 244

28 Photogrammetry 0 0

29 Mapping 0 0

30 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR 0 0

31 Architecture Development 0 0

32 Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment 0 0

33 ITS Analysis 0 0

34 ITS Plans 0 0

35 Geotechnical 0 144 144

36 3D Modeling 96 96

2,547 44 139 95 244 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,213

27 Survey Field Crew Days 51 51

Notes: 1. Staff hours for prime consultant come directly from each discipline's worksheet.

2. Staff hours for subconsultants are to be entered manually into columns D through O.

3. For workbooks prepared by subconsultants, their project hours will be totaled in column C.

SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway)

Project Total

445215-1-52-01

Project Staff Hours

Summary Page 2 of 63 8/19/2020

Financial Project Number: 445215-1-52-01 Project Name: SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway)

FAP Number: N/A Date: 8/19/2020 Name of Consultant: Pegasus Engineering, LLC

EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION

ON CADD

Grand

Total Project

Manager Senior

Engineer 2 Senior

Engineer 1 Engineer 2

Senior Designer

Staff Classi-fication 6

Staff Classi-fication 7

Staff Classi-fication 8

Staff Classi-fication 9

Staff Classi-fication 10

Staff Classi-fication 11

Staff Classi-fication 12

Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours PERCENT

3. Project General and Project Common Tasks 291 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. Roadway Analysis 909 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. Roadway Plans 302 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6a. Drainage Analysis 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6b. Drainage Plans 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. Utilities 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. Environmental Permits and Env. Clearances 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9. Structures - Misc. Tasks, Dwgs, Non-Tech. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10. Structures - Bridge Development Report 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11. Structures - Temporary Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12. Structures - Short Span Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14. Structures - Structural Steel Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

15. Structures - Segmental Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

16. Structures - Movable Span 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

17. Structures - Retaining Walls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

18. Structures - Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

19. Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis 307 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20. Signing & Pavement Marking Plans 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

21. Signalization Analysis 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

22. Signalization Plans 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

23. Lighting Analysis 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

24. Lighting Plans 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

25. Landscape Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

26. Landscape Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

27. Survey (Field & Office Support) 244 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

28. Photogrammetry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

29. Mapping 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

30. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

31. Architecture Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

32. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

33. Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

34. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

35. Geotechnical 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

36. 3D Modeling 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTALS 3213 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hours from "Summary" sheet

ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT FOR TECHNICAL PROPOSALS - GRAND TOTAL

STAFF HOURS

TOTAL

RANGE

WORK ACTIVITY

Staff Hour Summary--Grand Total Page 3 of 63 8/19/2020 9:42 AM

Field Survey Estimate:

Notes: 0 4-person crew days 0 0

1. This worksheet provides the distribution of the grand total staff hours for a project.

2. Percentages for staff hour distribution by classification are entered below in rows 65 to 99 of this sheet.

3. Total Staff Hours (column O) may not match staff hours from Summary worksheet (column B) due to rounding. Staff hours calculated for employee classifications are to be adjusted so totals in columns B and O match.

4. Formulas under "Total Staff Hours Range" (columns O & P) may be adjusted to provide desired range.

5. This spreadsheet to be provided in Technical Proposals for Districts that require a breakdown of hours by classification.

Financial Project Number: 445215-1-52-01 Project Name:SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway)

FAP Number: N/A Date: 8/19/2020 Name of Consultant: Pegasus Engineering, LLC

Hours from

"Summary" sheet Grand Total

Project

Manager

Senior

Engineer 2

Senior

Engineer 1 Engineer 2

Senior

Designer

Staff Classi-fication 6

Staff Classi-fication 7

Staff Classi-fication 8

Staff Classi-fication 9

Staff Classi-fication 10

Staff Classi-fication 11

Staff Classi-fication 12 Total

3. Project General and Project Common Tasks 291 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

4. Roadway Analysis 909 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

5. Roadway Plans 302 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

6a. Drainage Analysis 47 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

6b. Drainage Plans 78 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

7. Utilities 139 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

8. Environmental Permits and Env. Clearances 95 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

9. Structures - Misc. Tasks, Dwgs, Non-Tech. 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

10. Structures - Bridge Development Report 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

11. Structures - Temporary Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

12. Structures - Short Span Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

14. Structures - Structural Steel Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

15. Structures - Segmental Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

16. Structures - Movable Span 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

17. Structures - Retaining Walls 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

18. Structures - Miscellaneous 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

19. Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis 307 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

20. Signing & Pavement Marking Plans 96 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

21. Signalization Analysis 240 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

22. Signalization Plans 102 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

23. Lighting Analysis 99 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

24. Lighting Plans 24 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

25. Landscape Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

26. Landscape Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

27. Survey (Field & Office Support) 244 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

28. Photogrammetry 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

29. Mapping 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

30. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

31. Architecture Development 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

32. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

33. Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

34. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

35. Geotechnical 144 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

36. 3D Modeling 96 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT FOR TECHNICAL PROPOSALS - GRAND TOTAL

Staff Hour Distribution Percentages - Grand Total

(Prime Consultant)

Staff Hour Summary--Grand Total Page 4 of 63 8/19/2020 9:42 AM

Note: This spreadsheet to be used in Technical Proposal for Districts requiring the Grand Total hours be provided along with percentage distribution by classification.

Staff Hour Summary--Grand Total Page 5 of 63 8/19/2020 9:42 AM

Financial Project Number: 445215-1-52-01 Project Name: SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway)

FAP Number: N/A Date: 8/19/2020 Name of Consultant: Pegasus Engineering, LLC

WORK EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION

ACTIVITY ON CADD

Firm Total

Project Manager

Senior Engineer 2

Senior Engineer 1

Engineer 2 Senior

Designer Staff Classi-fication 6 Staff Classi-fication 7 Staff Classi-fication 8 Staff Classi-fication 9 Staff Classi-fication 10

Staff Classi-fication 11

Staff Classi-fication 12

Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours PERCENT

3. Project General and Project Common Tasks 247 25 37 49 74 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 247 272

4. Roadway Analysis 909 91 136 182 273 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 909 1000

5. Roadway Plans 302 30 45 60 91 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 332

6a. Drainage Analysis 47 5 7 9 14 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 52

6b. Drainage Plans 78 8 12 16 23 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 87

7. Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. Environmental Permits,and Env. Clearances 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9. Structures - Misc. Tasks, Dwgs, Non-Tech. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10. Structures - Bridge Development Report 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11. Structures - Temporary Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12. Structures - Short Span Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14. Structures - Structural Steel Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

15. Structures - Segmental Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

16. Structures - Movable Span 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

17. Structures - Retaining Walls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

18. Structures - Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

19. Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis 307 31 46 61 92 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 307 338

20. Signing & Pavement Marking Plans 96 10 14 19 29 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 106

21. Signalization Analysis 240 24 36 48 72 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 240 264

22. Signalization Plans 102 10 15 20 31 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 112

23. Lighting Analysis 99 10 15 20 30 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 110

24. Lighting Plans 24 2 4 5 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 26

25. Landscape Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

26. Landscape Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

27. Survey (Field & Office Support) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

28. Photogrammetry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

29. Mapping 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

30. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

31. Architecture Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

32. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

33. Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

34. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

35. Geotechnical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

36. 3D Modeling 96 10 14 19 29 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 106

TOTALS 2,547 256 381 508 765 639 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,549 2,805

ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT FOR TECHNICAL PROPOSALS - FIRM TOTAL

Hours from "Summary" sheet

TOTAL

STAFF HOURS

RANGE

Staff Hour Summary-Pegasus Page 6 of 63 8/19/2020 9:42 AM

Notes: 0 4-person crew days 2,549 2,805

1. This worksheet provides the distribution of a firm's total staff hours for a project.

2. Percentages for staff hour distribution by classification are entered below in rows 64 to 98 of this sheet.

3. Total Staff Hours (column O) may not match staff hours from Summary worksheet (column B) due to rounding. Staff hours calculated for employee classifications are to be adjusted so totals in columns B and O match.

4. Formulas under "Total Staff Hours Range" (columns O & P) may be adjusted to provide desired range.

Financial Project Number: 445215-1-52-01 Project Name:SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway)

FAP Number: N/A Date: 8/19/2020 Name of Consultant: Pegasus Engineering, LLC

Hours from "Summary" sheet

Firm Total Project

Manager Senior

Engineer 2 Senior

Engineer 1 Engineer 2 Senior

Designer Staff Classi-fication 6 Staff Classi-fication 7 Staff Classi-fication 8 Staff Classi-fication 9 Staff Classi-fication 10

Staff Classi-fication 11

Staff Classi-fication 12 Total

3. Project General and Project Common Tasks 247 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

4. Roadway Analysis 909 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

5. Roadway Plans 302 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

6a. Drainage Analysis 47 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

6b. Drainage Plans 78 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

7. Utilities 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

8. Environmental Permits,and Env. Clearances 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

9. Structures - Misc. Tasks, Dwgs, Non-Tech. 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

10. Structures - Bridge Development Report 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

11. Structures - Temporary Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

12. Structures - Short Span Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

14. Structures - Structural Steel Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

15. Structures - Segmental Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

16. Structures - Movable Span 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

17. Structures - Retaining Walls 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

18. Structures - Miscellaneous 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

19. Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis 307 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

20. Signing & Pavement Marking Plans 96 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

21. Signalization Analysis 240 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

22. Signalization Plans 102 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

23. Lighting Analysis 99 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

24. Lighting Plans 24 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

25. Landscape Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

26. Landscape Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

27. Survey (Field & Office Support) 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

28. Photogrammetry 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

29. Mapping 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

30. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

31. Architecture Development 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

32. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

33. Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

34. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

35. Geotechnical 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

36. 3D Modeling 96 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 30.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT FOR TECHNICAL PROPOSALS - FIRM TOTAL

Staff Hour Distribution Percentages - Firm Total

FIRM TOTAL

Staff Hour Summary-Pegasus Page 7 of 63 8/19/2020 9:42 AM

Financial Project Number: 445215-1-52-01 Project Name: SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway)

FAP Number: N/A Date: 8/19/2020 Name of Consultant: Quest Corp of America, Inc.

WORK EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION

ACTIVITY ON CADD

Firm Total COS Sr.

Staff Classi-fication 2

Staff Classi-fication 3

Staff Classi-fication 4

Staff Classi-fication 5

Staff Classi-fication 6

Staff Classi-fication 7

Staff Classi-fication 8

Staff Classi-fication 9

Staff Classi-fication 10

Staff Classi-fication 11

Staff Classi-fication 12

Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours PERCENT

3. Project General and Project Common Tasks 44 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 48

4. Roadway Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. Roadway Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6a. Drainage Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6b. Drainage Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. Utilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. Environmental Permits,and Env. Clearances 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9. Structures - Misc. Tasks, Dwgs, Non-Tech. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10. Structures - Bridge Development Report 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11. Structures - Temporary Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

12. Structures - Short Span Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

14. Structures - Structural Steel Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

15. Structures - Segmental Concrete Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

16. Structures - Movable Span 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

17. Structures - Retaining Walls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

18. Structures - Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

19. Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

20. Signing & Pavement Marking Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

21. Signalization Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

22. Signalization Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

23. Lighting Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

24. Lighting Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

25. Landscape Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

26. Landscape Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

27. Survey (Field & Office Support) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

28. Photogrammetry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

29. Mapping 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

30. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

31. Architecture Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

32. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

33. Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

34. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

35. Geotechnical 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

36. 3D Modeling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTALS 44 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 48

ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT FOR TECHNICAL PROPOSALS - FIRM TOTAL

Hours from "Summary" sheet

TOTAL

STAFF HOURS

RANGE

Staff Hour Summary-QUEST Page 8 of 63 8/19/2020 9:42 AM

Notes: 0 4-person crew days 44 48

1. This worksheet provides the distribution of a firm's total staff hours for a project.

2. Percentages for staff hour distribution by classification are entered below in rows 64 to 98 of this sheet.

3. Total Staff Hours (column O) may not match staff hours from Summary worksheet (column B) due to rounding. Staff hours calculated for employee classifications are to be adjusted so totals in columns B and O match.

4. Formulas under "Total Staff Hours Range" (columns O & P) may be adjusted to provide desired range.

Financial Project Number: 445215-1-52-01 Project Name:SR 5 Resurfacing from Post Rd to SR 404 (Pineda Causeway)

FAP Number: N/A Date: 8/19/2020 Name of Consultant: Quest Corp of America, Inc.

Hours from "Summary" sheet

Firm Total COS Sr.

Staff Classi-fication 2

Staff Classi-fication 3

Staff Classi-fication 4

Staff Classi-fication 5

Staff Classi-fication 6

Staff Classi-fication 7

Staff Classi-fication 8

Staff Classi-fication 9

Staff Classi-fication 10

Staff Classi-fication 11

Staff Classi-fication 12 Total

3. Project General and Project Common Tasks 44 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00%

4. Roadway Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

5. Roadway Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

6a. Drainage Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

6b. Drainage Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

7. Utilities 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

8. Environmental Permits,and Env. Clearances 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

9. Structures - Misc. Tasks, Dwgs, Non-Tech. 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

10. Structures - Bridge Development Report 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

11. Structures - Temporary Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

12. Structures - Short Span Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

14. Structures - Structural Steel Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

15. Structures - Segmental Concrete Bridge 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

16. Structures - Movable Span 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

17. Structures - Retaining Walls 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

18. Structures - Miscellaneous 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

19. Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

20. Signing & Pavement Marking Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

21. Signalization Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

22. Signalization Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

23. Lighting Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

24. Lighting Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

25. Landscape Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

26. Landscape Plans 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

27. Survey (Field & Office Support) 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

28. Photogrammetry 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

29. Mapping 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

30. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

31. Architecture Development 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

32. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

33. Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00%

34. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .