CN-550000-C9V46-00020000.pdf

PDF 274 KB Posted

Attached to
Master Agreement FL|C9V46|f2ddd5acecd14001e7a88978a44c2048
Contract number
C9V46
Issued by
Florida

About this file

This document is an Amendment (Amendment No. 2) to a Standard Professional Services Agreement between the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and two consulting firms: Resource Systems Group, Inc. and The Hester Group, LLC. The agreement is specifically for District Five and involves Financial Project No. 437113-1-22-01, with the original agreement initially executed on 6/23/2017.

The contract focuses on a study for Route and Mode Choice Application Development, with the amendment modifying the scope of work by removing certain tasks related to Carpool-Vanpool application development and adding technical support for the ITN (Invitation to Negotiate) proposal phase. The total maximum contract amount remains $434,057, with Resource Systems Group receiving $323,263 in lump sum services and $102,583 in limiting amount services, and The Hester Group receiving $8,211 in lump sum services. The services are to be completed by November 30, 2019, and include providing technical review of proposals, answering technical review committee questions, and supporting the negotiation process for developing an application engine that can compute trips across multiple modes of travel.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
CN-550000-C9V46.pdf PDF
CN-550000-C9V46-00010000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-C9Q74-00110000.pdf PDF
CN-550000-C9V46-00030000.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

District Five Professional Services Office, 719 South Woodland Blvd. MS 4-524, Deland, Florida 32720, (386) 943-5526, www.fdot.gov

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

AMENDMENT TO

STANDARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

375-030-97

PROCUREMENT

08/18

Amendment Number: 2 Amendment Execution Date:

Original Agreement No.: C9V46 Original Agreement Execution Date: 6/23/2017

Consultant Name: Resource Systems Group, Inc.

FM Number(s): 437113-1-22-01

Agreement Description: Study for Route and Mode Choice Application Development

Purpose of Amendment:

Modification of compensation elements on contract, Add Funds, Time Extension, Add Rate, Incorporate attachments to the contract, Add Provision

The terms of the original agreement referenced above are hereby amended:

The following modifications are made to the contract:

Basic Services (LA-4): Subject to the established limiting amount, the Consultant will be compensated for these services based on the rates provided in Table 6 of Section 5.0. No multipliers will be applied to these rates. Payment for such services will be based on approved time incurred during the billing period.

The total maximum limiting amount of $434,057.00 for all services required under the original agreement and all supplements and amendments thereto is herein increased by $0.00. The revised total maximum limiting amount for all services is $434,057.00. The services specified in Exhibit “A”, Scope of Services of the original agreement are amended and attached as Exhibit "A".

The services described in Exhibit “A”, Scope of Services will be funded by the redistribution of lump sum funds from activities being removed from the scope as described in the Exhibit “A”, Scope of Services and as shown on Attachment No. 1, Summary of Contract Fees.

Section 2.B. of the Standard Professional Services Agreement is revised to extend the time period for completion of basic project services through 11/30/2019.

Table 6 of Exhibit “B”, Method of Compensation, is updated as follows:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 521318C5-B2D0-4522-900F-FCFD7395676F

2/27/2019 | 4:07 PM EST

District Five Professional Services Office, 719 South Woodland Blvd. MS 4-524, Deland, Florida 32720, (386) 943-5526, www.fdot.gov

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

AMENDMENT TO

STANDARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

375-030-97

PROCUREMENT

08/18

Table 6 ‐ Loaded Labor Rates

* No Multipliers will be added to the following rates.

Consultant Job Class Unit Rate

Resource Systems Group, Inc. CADD/Computer Technician Hour $92.84

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Chief Computer Programmer Hour $246.76

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Chief Engineer Hour $348.10

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Chief Planner Hour $411.33

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Chief Scientist Hour $397.44

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Principal Engineer Hour $266.97

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Project Manager Hour $186.61

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Project Planner Hour $114.14

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Senior Computer Programmer Hour $185.07

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Senior Scientist Hour $277.62

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Senior Specialist Hour $100.41

Resource Systems Group, Inc. Specialist Hour $82.67

The Hester Group, LLC Public Information Officer Hour $79.17

The Hester Group, LLC Senior Specialist Hour $135.73

The following attachments are hereby incorporated into this Amendment:

Exhibit “A”, Scope of Services, pages A-1 through A-3 Attachment No. 1, Summary of Contract Fees

Except as hereby modified, amended, or changed, all of the terms and conditions of said original agreement and any supplements and amendments thereto will remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed, the day and year first above written.

CONSULTANT STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Resource Systems Group, Inc.

Name of Consultant

BY: BY:

Name: Name: Alan E. Hyman, P.E.

Title: Title: Director of Transportation Operations

District Five

FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY

PROCUREMENT OFFICE REVIEW: LEGAL OFFICE REVIEW:

Procurement Office Legal Office

DocuSign Envelope ID: 521318C5-B2D0-4522-900F-FCFD7395676F

Stephen Lawe

CEO

A-1

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES

C9V46, AM #2

Financial Project ID: 437113-1-22-01 Description: Study for Route and Mode Choice Application Development

County: Districtwide

1. PURPOSE

The purpose of this supplement is to remove the lump sum task assignments Task 4- Design Concept and Task 5-Requirements from the scope of work regarding the study of Carpool-Vanpool application development as the Task 3-Feasibility Study of Carpool- Vanpool application development found that it was not feasible for the Department to develop an application engine supporting Carpool-Vanpool trip matching therefore design concept and requirements are not needed. Additionally, the purpose of this amendment is to describe additional task assignments for the scope of work and the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the DEPARTMENT relating to the study of Route and Mode Choice application engine development. The additional scope items for technical ITN proposal phase support will be provided by the CONSULTANT on a limiting amount basis as requested by the DEPARTMENT.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This project consists of studying the feasibility, design concept and requirements needed for the Department designing an application engine with a clearly defined resting endpoint for the computation of trips across multiple modes of travel. The provider would send requests for trips, planned and in process, user information about prefers across parameters reflecting costing metrics (mode preference, environmental impact, reliability, trip cost, trip time, etc.) and receive multiple trip options (current and planned trip types permitted) reflecting the best results based on the users preferences via restful endpoint and/or webservice. The application engine would serve the purpose of giving a provider a single interface for route and mode choice.

3. SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDMENT OBJECTIVE

Carpool-Vanpool application development study scope tasks to be removed from Development by the Department:

a. Task 4 – Design Concept

i. Turbo File Update

ii. ConOps Development

iii. MOU

b. Task 5 – Requirements

i. Architecture of the engine

ii. Module Structure

A-2

iii. Database design and requirements

iv. Software Requirements

v. Interfaces

vi. Mockups of Human Machine Interfaces

vii. Hardware Requirements (Development, Testing & Implementation)

viii. System Test Requirements

ix. Subsystem Test Requirements

x. Final Report and Recommendations

Additional Route and Mode Choice application development study scope tasks to be performed by the Consultant:

a. Task 1 – Technical ITN proposal phase support

During the ITN proposal phase, CONSULTANT will assist DEPARTMENT with responding to questions received from potential vendors. The CONSULTANT will provide a technical review of any requested proposal documents to ensure that the proposed system meets requirements of the design, are technically feasible, and assist DEPARTMENT in reviewing customer references. The CONSULTANT may provide DEPARTMENT with pros and cons of technical proposals, a review and evaluation of the team’s necessary knowledge, skills and abilities to perform the work requested, and a summary of reference projects which the proposed vendor has completed that are directly relevant. In addition, CONSULTANT will review the software development and deployment process that each vendor proposes to ensure that the process meets industry standards and follows the expected steps for a successful software integration project.

If oral interviews are requested by DEPARTMENT, the CONSULTANT team will attend by teleconference any meetings requested by the DEPARTMENT and provide an assessment of the proposed solutions, team qualifications, and approach to completion of the project.

The following ITN procurement support will be included:

i. Technical review of proposals for the requirements of the Route and Mode Choice application engine.

ii. Brief TRC after proposal reviews.

iii. Answer TRC questions related to the Route and Mode Choice engine development.

iv. Technical support by teleconference during the negotiation process related to the Route and Mode Choice application engine.

4. GOVERNING PROVISION FOR WORK

All services shall be performed in accordance with the governing provisions outlined in the Original Agreement and any previous Amendments, except as modified herein.

A-3

5. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES

The CONSULTANT shall provide the services outlined in the Original Agreement and any previous Amendments, except as modified herein.

6. DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES

The DEPARTMENT shall provide the services outlined in the Original Agreement and any previous Amendments, except as modified herein.

7. SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION

For a summary of all compensation for this Supplemental Amendment, please refer to the Attachment No. 1, which is incorporated herein by reference.

8. LENGTH OF SERVICES

The Services requested under the Supplemental Amendment are to be completed by such time as will support the Department schedule of November 30th, 2019.

DESIGN SERVICES Financial Project No. 437113-1-22-01

Original

Agreement through

Previous

Amendments

This

Amendment

No. 2

Revised

Contract

Totals

LUMP SUM

Resource Systems Group, Inc. 425,846$ (102,583)$ 323,263$

Hester Group, LLC 8,211$ -$ 8,211$

Total Lump Sum Amount 434,057$ (102,583)$ 331,474$

LIMITING AMOUNT

Resource Systems Group, Inc. -$ 102,583$ 102,583$

Hester Group, LLC -$ -$ -$

Total Limiting Amount -$ 102,583$ 102,583$

TOTAL MAXIMUM LIMITING AMOUNT 434,057$ -$ 434,057$

Basic Services (LA-4)

Basic Services (LS-2)

ATTACHMENT NO. 1: Summary of Contract Fees

C9V46, Amendment No. 2

Study for Route and Mode Choice Application Development

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .