Section L Attachment 1 - PP Questionnaire .pdf

FA8621-24-R-B006

Section L, Attachment 1

SECTION L, ATTACHMENT 1

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN COMPLETED THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW

FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________ B. CAGE Code of Contractor: ___________________________________________________ C. Contract Number/Task Order Number: __________________________________________ D. Contract Type: _____________________________________________________________ E. Competitive Contract? Yes __________ No _________ F. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________ G. Initial Contract Value: $______________________________________________________ H. Current/Final Contract Value: $________________________________________________ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer/Agency Name: ____________________________________________________ B. Customer/Agency Description (if applicable): ____________________________________ C. Geographic Description of Services under this Contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands): __________________________________________________________

SECTION 3. RESPONDER IDENTIFICATION

A. Responder’s Name: _________________________________________________________ B. Responder’s Title: __________________________________________________________ C. Responder’s Phone Number/Email: ____________________________________________ D. Number of Years Responder Worked on Subject Contract: __________________________

SECTION 4: SURVEY RESPONSES

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

Subfactor 1: Transition B P G Y R N

a. Transitioned network training capabilities to reduce risk of network downtime.

b. Utilized a recruiting process to ensure staffing plans meet transition plan requirements to minimize schedule risks.

c. Utilized an engineering approach to design, integrate and test mission training networks.

d. Integrated network architecture, cross domain solutions (CDS) and multi-level security (MLS) architecture, network accreditation, and service activation.

Please discuss every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory above.

Subfactor 2: Security B P G Y R N

a. Provided appropriate staffing to meet Joint Special Access Program (SAP) Security Implementation Guide (JSIG) Risk Management Framework (RMF) cybersecurity requirements for Air Force, DoD, or other Government programs leading to and maintaining an Authority to Operate (ATO).

b. Demonstrated hardware and software partitioning, and data storage/retrieval architecture that supports site operations.

c. Provided a security service in all areas of the contract.

d. Effectively demonstrated the pedigree and performance of CDS/MLS solution.

Please discuss every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory above.

Subfactor 3: Training Operations B P G Y R N

a. Demonstrated management of training system protocols.

b. Managed and executed distributed training events, to include Large Force Exercises

(LFE).

c. Led & supported a standards process from development to implementation.

d. Verified test activities, scheduled and managed Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) training events, and provided help desk functions.

e. Supported exercises at/with operations, training, warfare centers.

- Supported connections with other Air Force, DoD, or Coalition networks

- Supported accreditation activities at training sites (i.e. personnel clearances, site surveys, physical security, accreditation packages, working with PSO, etc)

f. Provided appropriate staffing to meet training operations requirements.

g. Met or exceeded availability threshold requirements (system and event availabilities).

h. Provided DMO configuration management activities.

Please discuss every response for which you indicated Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Yellow/Marginal, or Red/Unsatisfactory above.

Government Contracts Only: Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes ___ Default ___ Convenience ___ Pending Terminations ___ No ___ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Responder’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Email questionnaires to Kendall Holmes, kendall.holmes.2@us.af.mil and Jensine Ballweg, jensine.ballweg@us.af.mil NLT 3:00pm EST, 08 December 2023 mailto:kendall.holmes.2@us.af.mil mailto:jensine.ballweg@us.af.mil