The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
SSI
Award Cover Sheet
| The State Administrative Agent (SAA) should share this application template with prospective subapplicants. Subapplicants should rename the "Subapplicant" tab with their agency name (e.g. Racoon City), complete all required information on the tab and return to the SAA. The SAA is responsible for consolidating subapplicant requests and transmitting all requests to FEMA as a single attachment. The SAA should seek requests totalling approximately 150% of the total award allocation amount, allowing for competitive prioritization of project funding. Some cells in this document are "locked" to ensure consistency and unintended errors. If necessary, you may unlock sheets or cells with the password "2027CUAS". This form contains several Excel formulas intended to automatically adjust budgets as items are selected. Subapplicants should not remove these formulas and doing so may cause errors in funding decisions. | | |
| Award Number | Subrecipients | Amount Requested |
| State | Racoon City | $5,608,951 |
| Total Application Amount | | $0 |
| | $0 |
| | $0 |
| | $0 |
| | $0 |
| | $0 |
| | $0 |
| | $0 |
| | $0 |
| SAA Project (M&A is calculated within the project only) | $0.00 |
| Total Requested | $5,608,951 |
| The SAA may use this section to estimate total requested project costs. SAA M&A is automatically populated. Project cost classification and corresponding POETE + subrecipient M&A may be manually entered, or auto-populated through Excel formulas upon completion when all projects are received. FEMA will edit this section as needed when making a final project funding determinations and provide the final determinations to the SAA. | | | | | | | |
| Project COST CLASSIFICATION | Planning | Organization | Equipment | Training | Exercise | M&A | Total Amount |
| A & B. Personnel/Fringe Benefits | | | | | | | $0 |
| C. Travel | | | | | | | $0 |
| D. Equipment | | | | | | | $0 |
| E. Supplies | | | | | | | $0 |
| F. Consultants/Contractors | | | | | | | $0 |
| G. Other Costs | | | | | | | $0 |
| H. Management and Administration (sub-applicant) | | | | | | | $0 |
| SAA M&A of Sub-awards | N/A leave blank | N/A leave blank | N/A leave blank | N/A leave blank | N/A leave blank | $168,269 | $168,269 |
| TOTAL | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $168,269 | $168,269 |
Certifications
| C-UAS Grant Program Application Information |
| State Administrative Agency Name: |
| State Administrative Agency UEI: |
| C-UAS Grant Program Application Certifications | Enter AOR Name and Date to sign digitally |
| 1. I certify that my organization and all subrecipients will comply with all Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice counter-UAS policies. | |
| 2. I certify that my organization and all subrecipients will follow all privacy protection requirements. | |
| 3. I certify that my organization and all subrecipients will engage in operational coordination with all applicable Federal regulations. | |
| 4. I certify that my organization and all subrecipients will comply with applicable Federal Communications Commission and Federal Aviation Administration regulations. | |
| 5. I certify that my organization and all subrecipients are willing to support special events outside of its normal jurisdictions. | |
| 6. I certify that my organization and all subrecipients agree to provide mutual aid. | |
| 7. I certify that my organization will participate in data sharing and will enter into a vendor contract which enables efficient and reasonable data sharing with DHS counter-UAS operating entities (as allowed by applicable jurisdictional records retention policies, data sharing restrictions, and information law). Such data sharing mechanisms may include, but are not limited to, data output file transfer, limited viewer access, or shared cloud access. | |
| 8. I certify that my organization and all subrecipients will comply with federal statutes, DHS directives, policies, and procedures. | |
End of Sheet
SAMPLE - Raccoon City
Instructions:
Complete all sections below for your project. Complete only 1 project for each subrecipient.
Use narrative text where prompted.
Answer Yes/No prompts and provide details if “Yes.”
Add rows for additional items as needed.
Reference or attach supporting documents in the Appendices section.
Review for completeness before submission.
| Where applicable, select from the available dropdown list: | | Yes | No | Not Applicable |
| This template is designed to capture information necessary to determine funding requests and subsequent prioritization. Although this is not a required form, failing to provide the information necessary to evaluate projects may result limit evaluators ability to properly assess project effectiveness. Consistency in format will help ensure consistent reviews and results among applicants. Subapplicants should complete the below application and return it to their SAA to be considered for funding. SAAs seeking to implement projects should complete the below application for an SAA project. If completing projects on behalf of local agencies, complete a "subapplicant" tab for each local agency project. Tab name = Subapplicant name. One subapplicant = one project. Please "copy" tab to create more subapplicants. SAA project = one tab, identify "obo subapplicant" in equipment/services narrative when implemented on behalf of eligible subapplicants. | | | | |
| Section 1: Cover/Contact Information | | | | |
| Subrecipient: | Racoon City | | | |
| Project Title: | Operation Peregrine | | | |
| Project Amount: | $5,608,951 | *NOTE: Project Amount autopopulates from budget. Do not edit. | | |
| Point of Contact | (Name) | (Title) | (E-Mail) | (Phone) |
| Agency Certifying Official | (Name) | (Title) | (E-Mail) | (Phone) |
| Section 2: Executive Summary | |
| Narrative: | e.g.This project will deploy a multi-sensor C-UAS detection and mitigation system at Metro Stadium to protect large-scale events, including the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The project will enhance public safety, support mutual aid, and comply with all federal and state requirements. |
| Eligibility Statement | I certify that I am an eligible state administrative authority. I have read and will abide by the requirements of the C-UAS Grant Program NOFO. |
| Section 3: Project Description (answer yes or no and provide a brief explanation) | | | |
| Planned Activites/Services/Equipment | Yes | e.g. Install 4 radar sensors and 2 PTZ cameras with AI connectors for +D14:I22360-degree stadium coverage. Provide operator training and develop SOPs for event response. | |
| Training/Exercise/Security Planning | Yes | e.g. 2 police officers attending DTI-M training at FBI Schoolhouse. | |
| Mitigation Capabilities | Yes | e.g. Includes jammers and net systems for authorized mitigation. | |
| Radar Use Case | Yes | e.g. 4 radars for perimeter detection. | |
| EO/IR Integration | Yes | e.g. Cameras provide day/night coverage and integrate with radar. | |
| Passive RF (DF methods) | Yes | e.g. integrated passive detection built into radar system. | |
| Remote ID Compliance | Yes | e.g. Yes. System compliant with ASTM F3411-22a. | |
| DTI Description | Yes | e.g. System detects, tracks, and identifies UAS using radar and EO/IR integration. | |
| Deployment/Connectivity Elements | Yes | e.g. Includes network switches, backup generator, and secure data links. | |
| SaaS/Data Sharing Alignment | Yes | | e.g. Yes. Data sharing via secure cloud service with DHS. |
| Section 4: Capability Gap | | | |
| Capability Gap | Yes | | Use this field for a summary statement of the overall deficiency or unmet need. e.g. Yes. Data sharing via secure cloud service with DHS. |
| Threats/Vulnerabilities | Yes | The risk that harmful events (e.g., unauthorized drones) could exploit weaknesses in our systems or procedures to cause harm. E.g. | Large public events are vulnerable to unauthorized drone activity, posing risks to public safety and critical infrastructure. |
| Current System Gaps | Yes | Use this field to list or describe the specific factors (equipment, training, policy, etc.) that make up the broader capability gap. E.g. | No integrated detection or response protocols for UAS threats. |
| Section 5: Project Objectives | | |
| Project Objectives | e.g. Enhance detection, tracking, and mitigation of UAS threats at Metro Stadium. Train 10 operators and develop SOPs for event response. | |
| C-UAS Priority link | e.g. | Objective 1: Enhance UAS detection and response capabilities. |
| Public Safety Impact | | e.g. Improved safety for event attendees and first responders. |
| Other | | |
| Other | | |
| Section 6: Strategic Plan alignment | |
| Coordination/Implementation Plan(s) | Role/contribution within plan |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| Section 7: Implementation Plan (Timeline/Milestones) Identify milestones required to complete project activities/objectives. All work must be completed within the period of performance. | | | | | | | |
| Project activities/objectives | Milestone 1 | Milestone 2 | Milestone 3 | Milestone 4 | Milestone 5 | Start Date | End Date |
| e.g. OR/IR Integration | e.g. Complete site survey and receive FEMA EHP approval | Install equipment | Train operators | Utilize equipment and share feed with partner agencies. | Final drawdown, reporting and closeout | 7/1/27 | 12/31/27 |
| e.g. Train and certify all designated operators | Register for approved training courses | Train operators | Utilize equipment | Final drawdown, reporting and closeout | | 7/1/26 | 12/31/26 |
| e.g. Deploy and integrate C-UAS detection and, if authorized, mitigation systems | Procure previously identified mitigation equipment. | Receive mitigation training at the FBI Schoolhouse. | Utilize equipment at Summer Olympics event | Consolidate, analyze and share data and lessons learned. | Final drawdown, reporting and closeout | 7/1/26 | 12/31/26 |
| Section 8: Performance Goals & Measurement (NOFO aligned) Complete the "Baseline" and "Target" columns | | | | |
| Retain for future use. Reporting requirements should measure project effectiveness in addressing performance goals. | | | | |
| Goals | Performance Measure | Baseline | Target | Actual (upon closeout) |
| 1.a. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for purchase of C-UAS equipment. (Program Target 70%) | e.g. no C-UAS equipment is owned | e.g. 70% of this project funded C-UAS equipment | e.g. 70% of this project funded C-UAS equipment |
| 1.b. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for purchase of C-UAS services. (Program Target 10%) | e.g. no C-UAS services available | e.g. 10% of this project funded C-UAS services | e.g. 10% of this project funded C-UAS services |
| 1.c. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for training personnel in the operation of C-UAS technology. (Program Target 20%) | e.g. 0 staff trained/certified | e.g. 20% of program funds were used to train/certify designated staff | e.g. 20% of program funds were used to train/certify designated staff |
| 2.a. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | 80% of mitigation systems procured through the C-UAS Grant Program used to protect the 2028 Olympic and paralympic Games, other National Special Security Events or Special Event Assessment Rating activities in conjunction with Federal authorities. | e.g. 0% C-UAS deployment at SEAR/NSSE events | e.g. 80% C-UAS deployment at SEAR/NSSE events | e.g. 80% C-UAS deployment at SEAR/NSSE events |
| 2.b. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | Successfully identify and classify 90% of detected UAS threats (e.g., distinguishing between commercial, recreational, and potentially malicious UAS). | e.g. 0% classification of detected UAS | e.g. 90% classification of detected UAS | e.g. 90% classification of detected UAS |
| 2.c. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | Make equipment available for interagency deployment throughout state for mass gathering events. | e.g. 3 memorandums of agreement | e.g. 10 memorandums of agreement | e.g. 10 memorandums of agreement |
| 3. a. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Total number of hours each system is in active use since acquisition | e.g. 0 hours active | e.g. 500 hours active | e.g. 500 hours active |
| 3.b. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Cumulative number of UAS detections made by systems including repeated detections of the same UAS | e.g. 0 UAS detections | e.g. 735 UAS detections | e.g. 735 UAS detections |
| 3.c. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Number of distinct UAS identified, ensuring that multiple detections of the same UAS are counted as a single unique even | e.g. 0 UAS identified | e.g. 735 UAS identified | e.g. 735 UAS identified |
| 3.d. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Launch criminal investigations on 100% of identified violations of civil and criminal laws when UAS operators endanger the public, violate established airspace restrictions, or operate a UAS in furtherance of an element of another crime. (Include Total number of investigations launched based on intelligence provided by C-UAS) | e..g 0% operational, 0 investigations | e.g. 100% operational by end of project period; investigated 735 of 735 detected UAS. | e.g. 100% operational by end of project period; investigated 735 of 735 detected UAS. |
| Section 9: Policy and Compliance: Answer Yes/No and state intent/status | | | | | | |
| DHS/DOJ Policy Commitment | Yes | e.g. Yes. Will comply with all DHS/DOJ C-UAS policies. | | | | |
| Privacy Protections | Yes | e.g. Policies are in place for data minimization, access controls, and compliance with state law. | | | | |
| Operational Coordination | Yes | e.g. Have MOU with FBI and DHS for event support. | | | | |
| FCC/FAA Compliance | Yes | e.g. All operations will comply with FCC/FAA regulations. | | | | |
| Special Events Support | Yes | e.g. Yes. Will support regional special events upon request | | | | |
| Mutual Aid Agreements | Yes | e.g. Yes. Mutual aid with county law enforcement. | TOTAL | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Data Sharing | No | e.g. Currently unavailable, Intend to develop a cloud-based sharing with DHS per vendor contract. | | | | |
| Federal Statutes Compliance | Yes | e.g. Yes. Will comply with all federal statutes and directives. | | | | |
| Budget Summary: Do not edit this section. Amounts are auto-summed from subsequent sections (e.g. Personnel costs from the "Personnel/Fringe Benefits" or "Travel" etc.). | | | | | | | |
| COST CLASSIFICATION | Planning | Organization | Equipment | Training | Exercise | M&A | Total Project Amount |
| Personnel/Fringe Benefits | $0 | $128,728 | $0 | $8,240 | $0 | $0 | $136,968 |
| Travel | $0 | $0 | $0 | $2,988 | $0 | $0 | $2,988 |
| Equipment | $0 | $0 | $5,420,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $5,420,000 |
| Supplies | $0 | $0 | $2,795 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $2,795 |
| Consultants/Contractors | $0 | $12,000 | $5,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $17,000 |
| Other Costs | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Management and Administration | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $29,200 | $29,200 |
| TOTAL | $0 | $140,728 | $5,427,795 | $11,228 | $0 | $29,200 | $5,608,951 |
| If adding lines for additional items (e.g. equipment), please copy/paste an existing line or built-in formulas from the same category to ensure accurate budget summary. | | | |
| A & B. Personnel/Fringe Benefits (not including management and administration) | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| • 1 FTE supervisor – create, develop policy, plan, maintain, and supervise the C-UAS program over the performance period. This supervisor will also work with federal partners to establish a regional C-UAS response. | | |
• Overtime to deploy C-UAS operators to support the Regional events for the performance period of the grant (2026-2028).
• Overtime for a detective to follow up and conduct criminal investigations of unlawful UAS detected.
| Positions | Solution Area | # of FTEs | Rate | Quantity (# of hours) | Total Request | Quantity (# hours only) | Total (Rate x Quantity) | |
| Supervisor: 40 days of 2027 Olympics event operational costs and on-going OT through Performance Period | Organization | 1 | $155 | 640 | $99,021 | 640 | $99,021 | |
| DTI-M Tech operator: 24 days of Salary and Fringe operational for Olympics 2027 venue | Organization | 2 | $103 | 288 | $59,414 | 288 | $29,707 | Only 1 operator needed. |
| DTI-M operator attend FBI Schoolhouse training | Training | 2 | $103 | 40 | $8,240 | 80 | $8,240 | |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | | $166,675 | $136,968 | | |
| C. Travel | | | | | SME Recommendations | | Comments |
| Narrative | | | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Travel for 2 officers to attend FBI Schoolhouse training in Quantico VA | | | | | | | |
| Purpose | Solution Area | # of trips | $ per each | Total Request | # of trips | Total | |
| Airfare | Training | 2 | $700 | $1,400 | 2 | $1,400 | |
| Taxi from airport to training center | Training | 5 | $100 | $500 | 5 | $500 | |
| Meals and Incidentals at GSA M&IE rate for 2 officers x 8 days at Quantico VA | Training | 16 | $68 | $1,088 | 16 | $1,088 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | $2,988 | $2,988 | | |
| D. Equipment | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| The stadium worked with Dedrone to analyze the current system and physical landscape to design enhancements that would augment current system capabilities suitable to our environment. The recommended detection enhancement is for 4 radar sensors to provide 360 degree stadium coverage as well as 2 additional pan, tilt, zoom cameras with AI-connectors that can easily integrate into the current system and its central processing hub. | | |
Cost estimates come directly from long-time stadium contractor, Dedrone, specific to installing and operating new system components
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total | |
| Detection: Passive Radar System | Equipment | 4 | $255,000 | $1,020,000 | 4 | $1,020,000 | |
| Detection: Portable PTZ cameras with AI connectors and mounts | Equipment | 2 | $35,000 | $70,000 | 2 | $70,000 | |
| Mitigation: Drone Immobilization X2000 Pro interceptor seek, track and immobilize | Equipment | 1 | $4,200,000 | $4,200,000 | 1 | $4,200,000 | |
| Agency Transport SUVs | Equipment | 20 | $65,000 | $1,300,000 | 2 | $130,000 | Appears to be a complete fleet renewel. Reduced to 2 vehicles, comensurate with project requirements. |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | $6,590,000 | $5,420,000 | | |
| E. Supplies | | | | | SME Recommendations | | Comments |
| Narrative | | | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| n/a | | | | | | | |
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total | |
| Ratchet Straps (4 pack) to stabilize radar equipment | Equipment | 5 | $25 | $125 | 5 | $125 | |
| Various size nuts, bolts, u-rings and adhesive tape for securing equipment | Equipment | 1 | $300 | $300 | 1 | $300 | |
| Locking hard cases to secure equipment | Equipment | 15 | $150 | $2,250 | 15 | $2,250 | |
| Pad-locks | Equipment | 15 | $8 | $120 | 15 | $120 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | $2,795 | $2,795 | | |
| F. Consultants/Contractors | | | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Contract services for training on the specific equipment purchased through this grant, projected at $10,000 | | | | |
| Purpose | Solution Area | Total Request | Total | |
| Software license costs includes radar, camera, and AI integration | Organization | $12,000 | $12,000 | |
| Deployment installation services contract | Equipment | $5,000 | $5,000 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| TOTAL | $17,000 | $17,000 | |
| G. Other Costs | | | | | SME Recommendations | | Comments |
| Narrative | | | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| n/a | | | | | | | |
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | | |
| H. Management and Administration (M&A) | | | | | | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | Solution Area | # of FTEs/Items | Rate/Price per item | # of hours/items | Do not exceed 3% of total project cost | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Grant Manager hourly rate | M&A | 1 | $150 | 140 | $21,000 | $21,000 | |
| Grant manager fringe rate | M&A | 1 | $50 | 140 | $7,000 | $7,000 | |
| Grant management supplies, including printing paper, toner, folders and postage | M&A | 1 | $1,200 | 1 | $1,200 | $1,200 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | TOTAL | | | | $29,200 | $29,200 | |
| STOP: Application is complete. Verify services, equipment, quantities and costs are accurate. Send your project to the SAA for collection and review. | | | | | | | | |
| To be completed by the SAA only: C-UAS Grant Program Competitive Application Questions | | | | | | | |
| Program prioritization criterion are outlined below to help assist in determining eligibility and prioritization of funds. Please select the appropriate answers related to the applicant and project. | | | | | | | |
DHS may contact applicants to provide documentation supporting your responses to the questions below.
If supporting documentation is requested by DHS: Please provide supporting documentation materials via the method specified in the request. Applicants should provide supporting documentation that is readily available and appropriate for their organization.
Examples of supporting documentation may include (but are not limited to): Training certificate from the FBI’s National Counter-UAS Training Center or proof of registration for this course (required for approval to purchase mitigation equipment).
| Criteria # | Criteria Description | | | | | Response | | | | | | | | |
| 1 | Is the applicant a qualified public safety organization? Non-qualified agencies should not be considered for funding. | | | | | Yes | | | | | | | | |
| 2 | Timely Implementation: Will full implementation occur within 36 months? Projects requiring longer than the period of performance for complete implementation will not be considered for funding. | | | | | Yes | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | Does the applicant have a history of completing projects within scope and on-time? Applicants with a history of poor performance should not be considered for funding. | | | | | Yes | | | | | | | | |
| 4 | Special Event Assessment Rating (SEAR) Level I or II: Does the proposal specify support for cities hosting an event of National significance, including 2028 Summer Olympics, Superbowl, national events with an NSSE, SEAR 1 or 2 level designation? | | | | | Yes | | | | | | | | |
| 5 | Does the proposal include mitigation (i.e., kinetic or radio frequency intercept capabilities, such as spoofers, jammers, net systems or “kamikaze” drones? | | | | | Yes | | | | | | | | |
| 6 | Does the proposal clearly describe how it will detect, track, and identify UAS (mitigation may be described only if properly authorized, but is not required)? | | | | | Yes | | | | | | | | |
| 7 | Does the applicant currently have personnel certified to use the requested equipment; or does the proposal include a role based training plan appropriate for the requested equipment? Any proposed training and equipment must be fully consistent with the capabilities and standards of the FBI National Counter-UAS Training Center. | | | | | Yes | | | | | | | | |
| 8 | Is the proposal redundant to existing capabilities (not counting other proposals submitted under this application, or expansion/enhancement of existing capabilities)? | | | | | No | | | | | | | | |
| To be completed by Subject Matter Expert reviewers only and in coordination with FEMA Program Office | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Recommended Funding level (full or partial) | NSSE, SEAR 1 or 2 (0 or 40) | Mitigation (0 or 30 | Detect–Track–Identify (0 or 8) | DTI Chain (0 or 2) | DTIM Chain (0 or 4) | Deployment/connectivity equipment plan (0 or 4) | Wide Area DTIM Software as a Service (SaaS), (0 or 6) | Trainer and Operator Readiness (0 or 2) | Capability type (new or enhancement/maintenance) (1 or 2) | Timely implementation (≤ 6 months; 12 months). ≤ 6 months = 2 points and within 12 months = 1 point. Zero points if beyond 12 months. | Total Score (cannot exceed 100) | Requested | Recommended Funding Amount | Comments (include comments regarding partial funding recommendation and for projects that are not recommended.) |
| Partial | 40 | 30 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 | $6,808,658 | $5,608,951 | Reduced to focus priority on capabilities needed for NSSE event commensurate with total score of 100 as approved. |
Subapplicant
Instructions:
Complete all sections below for your project. Complete only 1 project for each subrecipient.
Use narrative text where prompted.
Answer Yes/No prompts and provide details if “Yes.”
Add rows for additional items as needed.
Reference or attach supporting documents in the Appendices section.
Review for completeness before submission.
| Where applicable, select from the available dropdown list: | | Yes | No | Not Applicable |
| This template is designed to capture information necessary to determine funding requests and subsequent prioritization. Although this is not a required form, failing to provide the information necessary to evaluate projects may result limit evaluators ability to properly assess project effectiveness. Consistency in format will help ensure consistent reviews and results among applicants. Subapplicants should complete the below application and return it to their SAA to be considered for funding. SAAs seeking to implement projects should complete the below application for an SAA project. If completing projects on behalf of local agencies, complete a "subapplicant" tab for each local agency project. Tab name = Subapplicant name. One subapplicant = one project. Please "copy" tab to create more subapplicants. SAA project = one tab, identify "obo subapplicant" in equipment/services narrative when implemented on behalf of eligible subapplicants. | | | | |
| Section 1: Cover/Contact Information | | | | |
| Subrecipient: | | | | |
| Project Title: | | | | |
| Project Amount: | $0 | *NOTE: Project Amount autopopulates from budget. Do not edit. | | |
| Point of Contact | (Name) | (Title) | (E-Mail) | (Phone) |
| Agency Certifying Official | (Name) | (Title) | (E-Mail) | (Phone) |
| Section 2: Executive Summary |
| Narrative: |
| Eligibility Statement |
| Section 3: Project Description (answer yes or no and provide a brief explanation) |
| Planned Activites/Services/Equipment |
| Training/Exercise/Security Planning |
| Mitigation Capabilities |
| Radar Use Case |
| EO/IR Integration |
| Passive RF (DF methods) |
| Remote ID Compliance |
| DTI Description |
| Deployment/Connectivity Elements |
| SaaS/Data Sharing Alignment |
| Section 4: Capability Gap |
| Capability Gap |
| Threats/Vulnerabilities |
| Current System Gaps |
| Section 5: Project Objectives |
| Project Objectives |
| C-UAS Priority link |
| Public Safety Impact |
| Other |
| Other |
| Section 6: Strategic Plan alignment | |
| Coordination/Implementation Plan(s) | Role/contribution within plan |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| Section 7: Implementation Plan (Timeline/Milestones) Identify milestones required to complete project activities/objectives. All work must be completed within the period of performance. | | | | | | | |
| Project activities/objectives | Milestone 1 | Milestone 2 | Milestone 3 | Milestone 4 | Milestone 5 | Start Date | End Date |
| Section 8: Performance Goals & Measurement (NOFO aligned) Complete the "Baseline" and "Target" columns | | | | |
| Retain for future use. Reporting requirements should measure project effectiveness in addressing performance goals. | | | | |
| Goals | Performance Measure | Baseline | Target | Actual (upon closeout) |
| 1.a. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for purchase of C-UAS equipment. (Program Target 70%) | | | |
| 1.b. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for purchase of C-UAS services. (Program Target 10%) | | | |
| 1.c. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for training personnel in the operation of C-UAS technology. (Program Target 20%) | | | |
| 2.a. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | 80% of mitigation systems procured through the C-UAS Grant Program used to protect the 2028 Olympic and paralympic Games, other National Special Security Events or Special Event Assessment Rating activities in conjunction with Federal authorities. | | | |
| 2.b. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | Successfully identify and classify 90% of detected UAS threats (e.g., distinguishing between commercial, recreational, and potentially malicious UAS). | | | |
| 2.c. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | Make equipment available for interagency deployment throughout state for mass gathering events. | | | |
| 3. a. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Total number of hours each system is in active use since acquisition | | | |
| 3.b. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Cumulative number of UAS detections made by systems including repeated detections of the same UAS | | | |
| 3.c. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Number of distinct UAS identified, ensuring that multiple detections of the same UAS are counted as a single unique even | | | |
| 3.d. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Launch criminal investigations on 100% of identified violations of civil and criminal laws when UAS operators endanger the public, violate established airspace restrictions, or operate a UAS in furtherance of an element of another crime. (Include Total number of investigations launched based on intelligence provided by C-UAS) | | | |
| Section 9: Policy and Compliance: Answer Yes/No and state intent/status | | | | |
| DHS/DOJ Policy Commitment | | | | |
| Privacy Protections | | | | |
| Operational Coordination | | | | |
| FCC/FAA Compliance | | | | |
| Special Events Support | | | | |
| Mutual Aid Agreements | TOTAL | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Data Sharing | | | | |
| Federal Statutes Compliance | | | | |
| Budget Summary: Do not edit this section. Amounts are auto-summed from subsequent sections (e.g. Personnel costs from the "Personnel/Fringe Benefits" or "Travel" etc.). | | | | | | | |
| COST CLASSIFICATION | Planning | Organization | Equipment | Training | Exercise | M&A | Total Project Amount |
| Personnel/Fringe Benefits | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Travel | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Equipment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Supplies | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Consultants/Contractors | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Other Costs | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Management and Administration | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| TOTAL | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| If adding lines for additional items (e.g. equipment), please copy/paste an existing line or built-in formulas from the same category to ensure accurate budget summary. | | | |
| A & B. Personnel/Fringe Benefits (not including management and administration) | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Positions | Solution Area | # of FTEs | Rate | Quantity (# of hours) | Total Request | Quantity (# hours only) | Total (Rate x Quantity) |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| TOTAL | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| C. Travel | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Purpose | Solution Area | # of trips | $ per each | Total Request | # of trips | Total |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | |
| D. Equipment | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | |
| E. Supplies | | | | | SME Recommendations | | Comments |
| Narrative | | | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| n/a | | | | | | | |
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | | |
| F. Consultants/Contractors | | | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Contract services for training on the specific equipment purchased through this grant, projected at $10,000 | | | | |
| Purpose | Solution Area | Total Request | Total | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| TOTAL | $0 | $0 | |
| G. Other Costs | | | | | SME Recommendations | | Comments |
| Narrative | | | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| n/a | | | | | | | |
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | | |
| H. Management and Administration (M&A) | | | | | | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | Solution Area | # of FTEs/Items | Rate/Price per item | # of hours/items | Do not exceed 3% of total project cost | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| | TOTAL | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| STOP: Application is complete. Verify services, equipment, quantities and costs are accurate. Send your project to the SAA for collection and review. | | | | | | | | |
| To be completed by the SAA only: C-UAS Grant Program Competitive Application Questions | | | | | | | |
| Program prioritization criterion are outlined below to help assist in determining eligibility and prioritization of funds. Please select the appropriate answers related to the applicant and project. | | | | | | | |
DHS may contact applicants to provide documentation supporting your responses to the questions below.
If supporting documentation is requested by DHS: Please provide supporting documentation materials via the method specified in the request. Applicants should provide supporting documentation that is readily available and appropriate for their organization.
Examples of supporting documentation may include (but are not limited to): Training certificate from the FBI’s National Counter-UAS Training Center or proof of registration for this course (required for approval to purchase mitigation equipment).
| Criteria # | Criteria Description | | | | | Response | | | | | | | | |
| 1 | Is the applicant a qualified public safety organization? Non-qualified agencies should not be considered for funding. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2 | Timely Implementation: Will full implementation occur within 36 months? Projects requiring longer than the period of performance for complete implementation will not be considered for funding. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | Does the applicant have a history of completing projects within scope and on-time? Applicants with a history of poor performance should not be considered for funding. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 4 | Special Event Assessment Rating (SEAR) Level I or II: Does the proposal specify support for cities hosting an event of National significance, including 2028 Summer Olympics, Superbowl, national events with an NSSE, SEAR 1 or 2 level designation? | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 5 | Does the proposal include mitigation (i.e., kinetic or radio frequency intercept capabilities, such as spoofers, jammers, net systems or “kamikaze” drones? | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 6 | Does the proposal clearly describe how it will detect, track, and identify UAS (mitigation may be described only if properly authorized, but is not required)? | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 7 | Does the applicant currently have personnel certified to use the requested equipment; or does the proposal include a role based training plan appropriate for the requested equipment? Any proposed training and equipment must be fully consistent with the capabilities and standards of the FBI National Counter-UAS Training Center. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 8 | Is the proposal redundant to existing capabilities (not counting other proposals submitted under this application, or expansion/enhancement of existing capabilities)? | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| To be completed by Subject Matter Expert reviewers only and in coordination with FEMA Program Office | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Recommended Funding level (full or partial) | NSSE, SEAR 1 or 2 (0 or 40) | Mitigation (0 or 30 | Detect–Track–Identify (0 or 8) | DTI Chain (0 or 2) | DTIM Chain (0 or 4) | Deployment/connectivity equipment plan (0 or 4) | Wide Area DTIM Software as a Service (SaaS), (0 or 6) | Trainer and Operator Readiness (0 or 2) | Capability type (new or enhancement/maintenance) (1 or 2) | Timely implementation (≤ 6 months; 12 months). ≤ 6 months = 2 points and within 12 months = 1 point. Zero points if beyond 12 months. | Total Score (cannot exceed 100) | Requested | Recommended Funding Amount | Comments (include comments regarding partial funding recommendation and for projects that are not recommended.) |
| | | | | | | | | | | 0 | $0 | $0 | Reduced to focus priority on capabilities needed for NSSE event commensurate with total score of 100 as approved. |
Subapplicant (2)
Instructions:
Complete all sections below for your project. Complete only 1 project for each subrecipient.
Use narrative text where prompted.
Answer Yes/No prompts and provide details if “Yes.”
Add rows for additional items as needed.
Reference or attach supporting documents in the Appendices section.
Review for completeness before submission.
| Where applicable, select from the available dropdown list: | | Yes | No | Not Applicable |
| This template is designed to capture information necessary to determine funding requests and subsequent prioritization. Although this is not a required form, failing to provide the information necessary to evaluate projects may result limit evaluators ability to properly assess project effectiveness. Consistency in format will help ensure consistent reviews and results among applicants. Subapplicants should complete the below application and return it to their SAA to be considered for funding. SAAs seeking to implement projects should complete the below application for an SAA project. If completing projects on behalf of local agencies, complete a "subapplicant" tab for each local agency project. Tab name = Subapplicant name. One subapplicant = one project. Please "copy" tab to create more subapplicants. SAA project = one tab, identify "obo subapplicant" in equipment/services narrative when implemented on behalf of eligible subapplicants. | | | | |
| Section 1: Cover/Contact Information | | | | |
| Subrecipient: | | | | |
| Project Title: | | | | |
| Project Amount: | $0 | *NOTE: Project Amount autopopulates from budget. Do not edit. | | |
| Point of Contact | (Name) | (Title) | (E-Mail) | (Phone) |
| Agency Certifying Official | (Name) | (Title) | (E-Mail) | (Phone) |
| Section 2: Executive Summary |
| Narrative: |
| Eligibility Statement |
| Section 3: Project Description (answer yes or no and provide a brief explanation) |
| Planned Activites/Services/Equipment |
| Training/Exercise/Security Planning |
| Mitigation Capabilities |
| Radar Use Case |
| EO/IR Integration |
| Passive RF (DF methods) |
| Remote ID Compliance |
| DTI Description |
| Deployment/Connectivity Elements |
| SaaS/Data Sharing Alignment |
| Section 4: Capability Gap |
| Capability Gap |
| Threats/Vulnerabilities |
| Current System Gaps |
| Section 5: Project Objectives |
| Project Objectives |
| C-UAS Priority link |
| Public Safety Impact |
| Other |
| Other |
| Section 6: Strategic Plan alignment | |
| Coordination/Implementation Plan(s) | Role/contribution within plan |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| List plan or plans in which your agency is included as a participant in CUAS capabilities (insert additional rows if needed) | Describe your roles and contribution to addressing/implementing CUAS capabilities. E.g. We are the primary law enforcement agency responsible for providing drone detection and tracking capabilities. |
| Section 7: Implementation Plan (Timeline/Milestones) Identify milestones required to complete project activities/objectives. All work must be completed within the period of performance. | | | | | | | |
| Project activities/objectives | Milestone 1 | Milestone 2 | Milestone 3 | Milestone 4 | Milestone 5 | Start Date | End Date |
| Section 8: Performance Goals & Measurement (NOFO aligned) Complete the "Baseline" and "Target" columns | | | | |
| Retain for future use. Reporting requirements should measure project effectiveness in addressing performance goals. | | | | |
| Goals | Performance Measure | Baseline | Target | Actual (upon closeout) |
| 1.a. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for purchase of C-UAS equipment. (Program Target 70%) | | | |
| 1.b. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for purchase of C-UAS services. (Program Target 10%) | | | |
| 1.c. Strengthen national preparedness by equipping SLTT agencies with C-UAS Grant Program capabilities. | Percentage of funds utilized for training personnel in the operation of C-UAS technology. (Program Target 20%) | | | |
| 2.a. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | 80% of mitigation systems procured through the C-UAS Grant Program used to protect the 2028 Olympic and paralympic Games, other National Special Security Events or Special Event Assessment Rating activities in conjunction with Federal authorities. | | | |
| 2.b. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | Successfully identify and classify 90% of detected UAS threats (e.g., distinguishing between commercial, recreational, and potentially malicious UAS). | | | |
| 2.c. Protect critical infrastructure, mass gatherings, and sensitive government operations from UAS threats. | Make equipment available for interagency deployment throughout state for mass gathering events. | | | |
| 3. a. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Total number of hours each system is in active use since acquisition | | | |
| 3.b. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Cumulative number of UAS detections made by systems including repeated detections of the same UAS | | | |
| 3.c. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Number of distinct UAS identified, ensuring that multiple detections of the same UAS are counted as a single unique even | | | |
| 3.d. Support the deployment of fixed or portable systems for UAS detection, tracking, identification, and—where authorized—mitigation, consistent with applicable laws. | Launch criminal investigations on 100% of identified violations of civil and criminal laws when UAS operators endanger the public, violate established airspace restrictions, or operate a UAS in furtherance of an element of another crime. (Include Total number of investigations launched based on intelligence provided by C-UAS) | | | |
| Section 9: Policy and Compliance: Answer Yes/No and state intent/status | | | | |
| DHS/DOJ Policy Commitment | | | | |
| Privacy Protections | | | | |
| Operational Coordination | | | | |
| FCC/FAA Compliance | | | | |
| Special Events Support | | | | |
| Mutual Aid Agreements | TOTAL | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Data Sharing | | | | |
| Federal Statutes Compliance | | | | |
| Budget Summary: Do not edit this section. Amounts are auto-summed from subsequent sections (e.g. Personnel costs from the "Personnel/Fringe Benefits" or "Travel" etc.). | | | | | | | |
| COST CLASSIFICATION | Planning | Organization | Equipment | Training | Exercise | M&A | Total Project Amount |
| Personnel/Fringe Benefits | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Travel | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Equipment | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Supplies | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Consultants/Contractors | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Other Costs | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Management and Administration | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| TOTAL | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| If adding lines for additional items (e.g. equipment), please copy/paste an existing line or built-in formulas from the same category to ensure accurate budget summary. | | | |
| A & B. Personnel/Fringe Benefits (not including management and administration) | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Positions | Solution Area | # of FTEs | Rate | Quantity (# of hours) | Total Request | Quantity (# hours only) | Total (Rate x Quantity) |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| TOTAL | | | | $0 | $0 | |
| C. Travel | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Purpose | Solution Area | # of trips | $ per each | Total Request | # of trips | Total |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | 0 | $0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | |
| D. Equipment | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | |
| E. Supplies | | | | | SME Recommendations | | Comments |
| Narrative | | | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| n/a | | | | | | | |
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | | |
| F. Consultants/Contractors | | | SME Recommendations | Comments |
| Narrative | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| Contract services for training on the specific equipment purchased through this grant, projected at $10,000 | | | | |
| Purpose | Solution Area | Total Request | Total | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| | | $0 | |
| TOTAL | $0 | $0 | |
| G. Other Costs | | | | | SME Recommendations | | Comments |
| Narrative | | | | | To be edited only by Federal review panel and as needed. | | SME: Explain why costs are changed or reduced. |
| n/a | | | | | | | |
| Item | Solution Area | # of items | $ per each | Total Request | # of items | Total | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| | | | $0 | 0 | $0 | |
| TOTAL | | | $0 | $0 | | |
| H. Management and Administration (M&A) | | | | | | SME Recommendations | Comments |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.