BPM006394-Civil_and_Environmental_Consultants.pdf

Request for Proposal

Solicitation No. BPM006394 Brownfields Environmental Site

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of

Environmental Quality

1110 W. Washington St.

Phoenix, AZ 85007

Solicitation Attachment – Offer and Acceptance | Revision No. 6 | Revised 03-24

Attachment 1 – Offer and Acceptance Form

SUBMISSION OF OFFER: The undersigned hereby offers and agrees to provide Brownfields Environmental Site Assessments in compliance with all terms, conditions, specifications, and amendments in the Solicitation and any written exceptions in the Offer indicated by the latest dated version below

CERTIFICATION: By signature in the above, Offeror certifies that it:

1. Will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment in violation of Federal Executive Order 11246, [Arizona] State Executive

Orders 2023-09, 2023-01, 2009-09 or A.R.S. §§ 41-1461 through 41-1465;

2. Has not given, offered to give, nor intends to give at any time hereafter any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or Service to a public servant in connection with the submitted offer. Failure to provide a valid signature affirming the stipulations required by this clause will result in rejection of the Offer. Signing the Offer with a false statement will void the Offer, any resulting contract, and may be subject to legal penalties under law;

3. Complies with A.R.S. § 18-132 when offering electronics or information technology products, Services, or maintenance;

4. Has submitted this Offer as a firm offer for 180 days following the Solicitation due date and time per the Instructions to Offers. Any extensions to the Offer Acceptance Period shall be made in accordance with the A.A.C. R2-7-C310;

5. Did not and will not involve collusion or other anti-competitive practices; and

6. Is not debarred from, or otherwise prohibited from, participating in any contract awarded by federal, state, or local government.

7. Acknowledges and agrees to the terms provided in the DBRA Requirements for Contractors and Subcontractors Under EPA Grants.

ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER

The offer is hereby accepted.

The Contractor is now bound to sell the Materials or Services listed by the attached Contract and based upon the Solicitation, including all terms, conditions, specifications, amendments, etc., and the Contractor’s Offer as accepted by the State.

The Contract shall henceforth be referred to as Contract No.

The effective date of the Contract is

The Contractor is cautioned not to commence any billable work or to provide any Material or Service under this Contract until Contractor receives purchase order or written notice to proceed.

State of Arizona Awarded this day of 20

Louis Anaya Chief Procurement Officer (CPO), MPA, C.P.M., CPPB

Procurement officer signature

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Offeror company name Signature of person authorized to sign Offer Date

11811 N. Tatum Blvd., Suite 3057 Ryan D. Dunning, Vice President

Address Printed name and Title

Phoenix, AZ 85028 Ryan D. Dunning, Vice President

City, State, ZIP Contact name and Title rdunning@cecinc.com (602) 760-2324, x2169

Contact email address Contact phone number

Revised Offers:

Date Signature Date Signature

Best and Final Offer:

Date Signature

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Solicitation Attachment – Boycott of Israel Disclosure | Revision No. 2 | Revised 11-22

Attachment 2 – Boycott of Israel Disclosure

Please note that if any of the following apply to this Solicitation, Contract, or Contractor, then the Offeror shall select the “Exempt Solicitation, Contract, or Contractor” option below:

● The Solicitation or Contract has an estimated value of less than $100,000;

● Contractor is a sole proprietorship;

● Contractor has fewer than ten (10) employees; or

● Contractor is a non-profit organization.

Pursuant to A.R.S. § 35-393.01, public entities are prohibited from entering into contracts “unless the contract includes a written certification that the company is not currently engaged in, and agrees for the duration of the contract to not engage in, a boycott of Materials or Services from Israel.”

Under A.R.S. § 35-393:

1. "Boycott" means engaging in a refusal to deal, terminating business activities or performing other actions that are intended to limit commercial relations with entities doing business in Israel or in territories controlled by Israel, if those actions are taken either:

(a) Based in part on the fact that the entity does business in Israel or in territories controlled by Israel.

(b) In a manner that discriminates on the basis of nationality, national origin or religion and that is not based on a valid business reason.

2. "Company" means an organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability company or other entity or business association, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company or affiliate, that engages in for-profit activity and that has ten or more full-time employees.

5. "Public entity": (a) Means this State, a political subdivision of this State or an agency, board, commission or department of this State or a political subdivision of this State. (b) Includes the universities under the jurisdiction of the Arizona board of regents and community college districts as defined in section 15-1401.

The certification below does not include boycotts prohibited by 50 United States Code Section 4842 or a regulation issued pursuant to that section. See A.R.S. § 35-393.03.

In compliance with A.R.S. § 35-393 et seq., all Offerors must select one of the following:

☐ The Company submitting this Offer does not participate in, and agrees not to participate in during the term of the contract, a boycott of Israel in accordance with A.R.S. § 35-393 et seq. I understand that my entire response will become a public record in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-C317;

☐ The Company submitting this Offer does participate in a boycott of Israel as described in A.R.S. § 35-393 et seq.; or

☐ Exempt Solicitation, Contract, or Contractor. Indicate which of the following statements applies to this Contract (may be more than one):

☐ Solicitation or Contract has an estimated value of less than $100,000;

☐ Contractor is a sole proprietorship;

☐ Contractor has fewer than ten (10) employees; or

☐ Contractor is a non-profit organization.

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Company name Signature of person authorized to sign

11811 N. Tatum Blvd., Suite 3057 Ryan D. Dunning, Vice President

Address Printed name and Title

Phoenix, AZ 85028 rdunning@cecinc.com (602) 760-2324, x2169

City, State, ZIP Contact email address Contact phone number

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Solicitation Attachment – Forced Labor of Ethnic Uyghurs Ban | Revision No. 3 | Revised 12-22

Attachment 3 – Forced Labor of Ethnic Uyghurs Ban

Please note that if any of the following apply to the Contractor, then the Contractor shall select the “Exempt Contractor” option below:

● Contractor is a sole proprietorship;

● Contractor has fewer than ten (10) employees; OR

● Contractor is a non-profit organization.

Pursuant to A.R.S. § 35-394, written certification is required to show that the company entering into a contract with a public entity does not use the forced labor, or use any contractors, subcontractors or suppliers that use the forced labor or any goods or services produced by the forced labor or any goods or services produced by the forced labor, of ethnic Uyghurs in the People's Republic of China.

Under A.R.S. § 35-394:

1. "Company" means an organization, association, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability company or other entity or business association, including a wholly owned subsidiary, majority-owned subsidiary, parent company or affiliate, that engages in for-profit activity and that has ten or more full-time employees.

2. "Public entity" means this State, a political subdivision of this State or an agency, board, commission or department of this State or a political subdivision of this State.

In compliance with A.R.S. § 35-394, all Contractors must select one of the following:

☐ Company does not use, and agrees not to use during the term of the contract, any of the following:

● Forced labor of ethnic Uyghurs in the People’s Republic of China;

● Any goods or services produced by the forced labor of ethnic Uyghurs in the People’s Republic of China; or

● Any Contractors, Subcontractors, or suppliers that use the forced labor or any goods or services produced by the forced labor of ethnic Uyghurs in the People’s Republic of China.

☐ The Company does participate in the use of Forced Uyghurs Labor as described in A.R.S. § 35-394.

☐ Exempt Contractor: Select all statements that apply to the Contractor:

☐ Contractor is a sole proprietorship;

☐ Contractor has fewer than ten (10) employees; and/or ☐ Contractor is a non-profit organization.

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.

Company name Signature of person authorized to sign

11811 N. Tatum Blvd., Suite 3057 Ryan D. Dunning, Vice President

Address Printed name and Title

Phoenix, AZ 85028 rdunning@cecinc.com (602) 760-2324, x2169

City, State, ZIP Contact email address Contact phone number

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Solicitation Attachment – Confidential Information Designation | Revision No. 3 | Revised 03-24

Attachment 4 – Confidential Information Designation

All materials submitted as part of a response to a solicitation are subject to Arizona public records law and will be disclosed if there is an appropriate public records request at the time of or after the award of the contract. Recognizing there may be materials included in a solicitation response that are proprietary or a trade secret, a process is set out in A.A.C. R2-7-103 (copy attached) that will allow qualifying materials to be designated as confidential and excluded from disclosure. For purposes of this process the definition of “trade secret” will be the same as that set out in A.A.C. R2-7-101(51).

Complete this form and return it with your Offer along with the appropriate supporting information to assist the State in making its determination as to whether any materials submitted as part of your Offer should be designated confidential because the material is proprietary or a trade secret and therefore not subject to disclosure. Offerors shall create a redacted version of documents containing confidential information upon request from the Procurement Officer.

STATE WILL NOT CONSIDER ANY MATERIAL IN YOUR OFFER “CONFIDENTIAL” UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THIS FORM.

Check one of the following – if neither is checked, State will assume that it is equivalent to “DOES NOT”:

☐ This response DOES NOT contain proprietary or trade secret information. I understand that my entire response will become public record in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-C317; or

☐ This response DOES contain trade secret information because it contains information that:

1. Is a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process;

2. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and

3. Is the subject of efforts by myself or my organization that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.

NOTE: Failure to attach an explanation may result in a determination that the information does not meet the statutory trade secret definition. All information that does not meet the definition of trade secret as defined by A.A.C. R2-7-101(51) will become public in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-C317. State may make its own determination on materials in accordance with A.A.C. R2-7-103.

If State agrees with Offeror’s designation of trade secret or confidentiality and the determination is challenged, the Offeror hereby agrees to cooperate and support the defense of the determination with all interested parties, including legal counsel or other necessary assistance.

By submitting this response, Offeror agrees that the entire Offer, including confidential, trade secret, and proprietary information may be shared with an evaluation committee and technical advisors during the evaluation process. Offeror agrees to indemnify and hold State, its agents and employees, harmless from any claims or causes of action relating to State’s withholding of information based upon reliance on the above representations, including the payment of all costs and attorney fees incurred by State in defending such an action.

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Solicitation Attachment – Confidential Information Designation | Revision No. 3 | Revised 03-24

Attachment – Confidential Information Designation (for reference only)

A.A.C. R2-7-103 [Confidential Information] as was current at time of Solicitation issuance

A. If a person wants to assert that a person's offer, specification, or protest contains a trade secret or other proprietary information, a person shall include with the submission a statement supporting this assertion. A person shall clearly designate any trade secret and other proprietary information, using the term "confidential".

Contract terms and conditions, pricing, and information generally available to the public are not considered confidential information under this Section.

B. Until a final determination is made under subsection (C), an agency chief procurement officer shall not disclose information designated as confidential under subsection (A) except to those individuals deemed by an agency chief procurement officer to have a legitimate state interest.

C. Upon receipt of a submission, an agency chief procurement officer shall make one of the following written determinations:

1. The designated information is confidential and the agency chief procurement officer shall not disclose the information except to those individuals deemed by the agency chief procurement officer to have a legitimate state interest;

2. The designated information is not confidential; or

3. Additional information is required before a final confidentiality determination can be made.

D. If an agency chief procurement officer determines that information submitted is not confidential, a person who made the submission shall be notified in writing. The notice shall include a time period for requesting a review of the determination by the state procurement administrator.

E. An agency chief procurement officer may release information designated as confidential under subsection (A) if:

1. A request for review is not received by the state procurement administrator within the time period specified in the notice; or

2. The state procurement administrator, after review, makes a written determination that the designated information is not confidential.

X

Exceptions to Instructions to Offerors (RFP) Article /

Paragraph or Exhibit

Reference

RFP language (Copy and paste from Solicitation) Proposed Changes / Alternate Language Rationale for Proposed Change State Response

X

Exceptions to Scope of Work and Specifications

Request for Proposal

Solicitation No. BPM006394

Brownfields Environmental Site Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

1110. W Washington St.

Phoenix, AZ 85007

Attachment 5 - BPM006394 Conformance Statements and Exceptions Requests

Offeror Name:

If taking exceptions, the relevant subsequent sections must be completed. Add additional rows as needed.

This document must be returned in an Excel (.xls or .xlsx) format.

STATE WILL NOT CONSIDER ANY EXCEPTIONS UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THIS FORM.

READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS BEFORE TAKING ANY EXCEPTIONS. OFFERS WITH EXCEPTIONS MAY BE FOUND NOT SUSCEPTIBLE FOR AWARD UNDER

IF NEITHER BOX IS MARKED WITH AN "X" UNDER ANY SECTION BELOW, THE OFFEROR’S RESPONSE TO THAT SECTION WILL BE CONSIDERED “YES” AND STATE

WILL INTERPRET THE OFFER AS IF THERE WERE NO EXCEPTIONS TAKEN.

CONFORMANCE TO THE INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Place an "X" in one of the following boxes to indicate the Offeror's conformance:

YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Instructions to Offerors (RFP) of the Solicitation Documents and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects.

NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Instructions to Offerors (RFP) in the Solicitation Documents, and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed below.

Special Instructions to Offerors

Standard Instructions to Offerors (RFP)

CONFORMANCE TO THE SCOPE OF WORK AND SPECIFICATIONS

Place an "X" in one of the following boxes to indicate the Offeror's conformance:YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Scope of Work and Specifications, along with any respective Exhibits, Addendums, and Appendices of the Solicitation

Requirements and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects.NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Scope of Work and Specifications, along with any respective Exhibits, Addendums, and Appendices of the Solicitation Requirements and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed below.

Solicitation Attachment – Conformance Statements and Exceptions Requests | Revision No. 2 | Revised 03-24

Article / Paragraph or

Exhibit Reference

RFP language (Copy and paste from Solicitation) Proposed Changes / Alternate Language Rationale for Proposed Change State Response

X

Exceptions to Contract Terms & Conditions

Article / Paragraph or

Exhibit Reference

RFP language (Copy and paste from Solicitation) Proposed Changes / Alternate Language Rationale for Proposed Change State Response

Addendum A to Special Terms & Conditions

Addendum B to Special Terms & Conditions

Uniform Terms & Conditions

Scope of Work and Specifications

CONFORMANCE TO THE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Place an "X" in one of the following boxes to indicate the Offeror's conformance:YES – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with any respective Exhibits, Addendums, and Appendices of the Solicitation Requirements and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects.NO – Offeror acknowledges that it has read and understands the Special Terms and Conditions and the Uniform Terms and Conditions, along with any respective Exhibits, Addendums, and Appendices of the Solicitation Requirements and attests that its Offer complies with all aspects EXCEPT FOR the exceptions listed below.

Special Terms & Conditions

Solicitation Attachment – Conformance Statements and Exceptions Requests | Revision No. 2 | Revised 03-24

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Solicitation Attachment – Key Personnel | Revision No. 1 | Revised 11-22

Attachment 6 – Key Personnel

Answer all questions thoroughly in the spaces provided. Complete this form in full for each one of the key personnel proposed to be involved in performing the Services. Insert or attach a separate resume as applicable, but any attached resumes are supplemental to this form and do not substitute for this form. If there are more than three (3) Key Personnel, please utilize the same form for each additional Personnel by making copies of this page as needed.

1 Name: Ryan Dunning Job title: Project Principal

Length of employment with the company: 17 Length of time in current role: 7

Proposed percentage of overall time to be dedicated to the Services: 20 % If applicable, length of time in related experience with large local, state or federal government agencies: 30

Proposed position with regard to the Services: Professional Level VI

Proposed primary responsibilities with regard to the Services: Mr. Dunning’s primary responsibility will be senior oversight for all work products.

Describe experience in performing Services similar to those that are to be assigned:

Mr. Dunning has over 30 years’ experience in conducting and managing Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) within Arizona and across the country. He has provided these services for a variety of clients to include local governments, real estate developers, lending institutions, solid waste and mining companies, commercial, manufacturers, and utilities. Mr. Dunning is an expert in the areas of due diligence, risk management, environmental liability management, Brownfields redevelopment and mergers & acquisitions strategy. He has also managed and performed numerous asbestos building inspections for a variety of clients, including real estate developers, construction and demolition companies, lending institutions, and individual property owners. When necessary for renovation or demolition purposes, oversight and management of abatement activities have been completed as well. Mr. Dunning has also managed underground storage tank removal and remediation projects for various petroleum and commercial companies at filling stations, bulk fuel plants, and commercial/industrial sites. Specific duties included work plan preparation, supervision and coordination of installation, removal, and remediation activities, coordination of numerous waste streams, verification sampling, and regulatory reporting, permitting, and communication.

Specific Brownfields Experience – Mr. Dunning managed the procurement of Brownfields funding to assist with the redevelopment of a site into a national bank branch in Troy, Michigan. Mr. Dunning managed the preparation of a Brownfield Plan, which was submitted to the Brownfield Redevelopment Authority and approved. As part of the plan, the City of Troy allocated $481,000 through tax increment financing to fund demolition, due care activities, and remediation of metals and hydrocarbon contaminated soil and geotechnically unsuitable fill. Mr. Dunning has since overseen these activities and the site has been successfully redeveloped. Mr. Dunning currently provides senior technical oversight to the City of Tucson Brownfields on-call contract and the City of Tempe Brownfields Phase II ESA currently in progress.

List job-related certifications, training, and education:

Class A/B UST Operator, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality; OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER/8 Hour Refresher; B.S., Geology, Eastern Michigan University

Resume: Ryan Dunning Resume

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Answer all questions thoroughly in the spaces provided. Complete this form in full for each one of the key personnel proposed to be involved in performing the Services. Insert or attach a separate resume as applicable, but any attached resumes are supplemental to this form and do not substitute for this form. If there are more than three (3) Key Personnel, 2 Name: John Burton Job title: Project Manager company: 23 year Length of time in current role: 18 Year

Proposed percentage of overall time to be dedicated to the Services: 20% If applicable, length of time in related experience with large local, state or federal government agencies: 27 years

Proposed position with regard to the Services: Professional Level IV

Proposed primary responsibilities with regard to the Services:

Mr. Burton will serve as Project Manager and primary point of contact. He will manage the technical staff, subconsultants and task assignments from the proposal stage, through to the final deliverable.

Describe experience in performing Services similar to those that are to be assigned:

Mr. Burton has over 23 years of experience in performing Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), site investigation, remediation and regulatory compliance. He has provided these services to a variety of clients to include government (city, county, state), real estate developers, banks, retail, commercial and manufacturers. Mr. Burton is highly experienced in field investigation of fuel and oil releases to both soil and groundwater. He has conducted dozens of field investigations using backhoes, hollow-stem auger drill rigs, dual wall percussion drill rigs, hammer drill rigs, direct push drill rigs, ground penetrating radar, and various manual sampling techniques. He has also managed and prepared site characterization reports, status reports, site closure reports, and UST removal and reporting. Mr. Burton has completed and/or managed Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) on behalf of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Arizona Department of Transportation, Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs, Maricopa County, Pima County, Santa Cruz County, and the Cities of Phoenix, Mesa, and Tucson. Mr. Burton is a former compliance officer and hydrologist for ADEQ and has extensive knowledge of State and federal statutes and regulations.

Specific Brownfields Experience – Mr. Burton has managed Brownfields projects on behalf of the cities of Phoenix, Tempe, Tucson, Mesa, Avondale and Holbrook. Activities have included preparing scopes of work/costing, site inventory lists, Phase I and II ESAs, soil-gas surveys, asbestos and lead-based paint surveys, Sampling and Analysis Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, Health and Safety Plans, ACRES reporting, invoicing and final report close-outs.

List job-related certifications, training, and education:

EPA Certified AHERA Building Inspector; Confined-Space Entry; OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER/ 8 Hour Refresher; Hazardous Waste Operation Supervisor Training ; PSMJ Project Manager Course; B.S., Environmental Science, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania

Resume: John Burton Resume

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Answer all questions thoroughly in the spaces provided. Complete this form in full for each one of the key personnel proposed to be involved in performing the Services. Insert or attach a separate resume as applicable, but any attached resumes are supplemental to this form and do not substitute for this form. If there are more than three (3) Key Personnel, 3 Name: Chad Hancock Job title: Field Services Manager company: 23 years Length of time in current role: 17 years

Proposed percentage of overall time to be dedicated to the Services: 25 % If applicable, length of time in related experience with large local, state or federal government agencies: 23 years

Proposed position with regard to the Services: Professional Level III

Proposed primary responsibilities with regard to the Services:

Mr. Hancock will provide field investigation oversight for Phase I and II ESAs, and asbestos & lead-based paint assessments.

Describe experience in performing Services similar to those that are to be assigned:

Mr. Hancock has over 23 years’ experience in the areas of Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and the investigation and remediation of soil and groundwater.

He is highly experienced in conducting property assessments for determination of a recognized environmental condition and identifying appropriate additional investigation.

Mr. Hancock has conducted assessment and field investigation of a variety of property uses to included former and operating gas stations, dry cleaners, industrial property, commercial sites, agricultural property and vacant land. He is also experienced in the collection of soil, surface water, groundwater, soil vapor, air samples, asbestos and lead paint samples. Mr.

Hancock has also been involved in the design and installation, operation, and maintenance of a wide variety of remedial systems to include air sparge, soil vapor extraction, and air stripping. He has also conducted in-situ remediation of groundwater remediation using biological and chemical techniques.

Specific Brownfields Experience – Mr. Hancock manages CEC’s Brownfields Program Technical Assistance contract with the City of Tucson and has completed more than 100 task assignments under the on-call. Activities have included Phase I and II ESAs, asbestos surveys/abatement, lead-based paint inspections/abatement, Sampling and Analysis Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, subcontractor management, scope of work and budget submittals, change orders and technical review.

List job-related certifications, training, and education:

EPA Certified AHERA Building Inspector; EPA Lead-Paint Building Inspector; OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER/ 8 Hour Refresher; BS, Environmental Science, University of Arizona

Resume: Chad Hancock Resume

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Answer all questions thoroughly in the spaces provided. Complete this form in full for each one of the key personnel proposed to be involved in performing the Services. Insert or attach a separate resume as applicable, but any attached resumes are supplemental to this form and do not substitute for this form. If there are more than three (3) Key Personnel, 1 Name: Oliver Sullivan Job title: Register Professional Geologist company: 10 years Length of time in current role: 10 years

Proposed percentage of overall time to be dedicated to the Services: 40 % If applicable, length of time in related experience with large local, state or federal government agencies: 10 years

Proposed position with regard to the Services: Register Professional Geologist/Professional Level III

Proposed primary responsibilities with regard to the Services:

Lead field technician for conducting site visits, field investigations, sampling, data acquisition, research and report writing, Phase I and II ESA efforts, asbestos and lead-based paint sampling and oversight.

Describe experience in performing Services similar to those that are to be assigned:

Mr. Sullivan is a Registered Geologist with 10 years of experience in the areas of Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), asbestos surveys, lead-based paint surveys, and conducting remediation. He has conducted Phase I ESA assessment of a wide variety of property uses to include industrial, commercial, retail, automotive, agriculture, commercial and residential. His Phase II ESA experience includes use of backhoes, hollow-stem auger drill rigs, dual wall percussion drill rigs, hammer drill rigs, direct push drill rigs, ground penetrating radar, and various manual sampling techniques. Mr. Sullivan has also conducted asbestos and lead-based paint surveys to include commercial and residential properties proposed for demolition or renovation. His remediation experience includes dig and haul, in-situ groundwater remediation and vapor extraction systems. Mr. Sullivan is also experienced in conducting soil-gas surveys, air sampling, groundwater sampling, well installation/abandonment, data review/management and report writing.

Specific Brownfields Experience – Mr. Sullivan has completed Brownfields projects on behalf of the cities of Phoenix, Tempe, Tucson, Avondale and Holbrook. These projects have included development of site inventory lists, Phase I and II ESAs, asbestos surveys, lead-based paint surveys, Sampling and Analysis Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and health and safety plans.

List job-related certifications, training, and education:

Registered Professional Geologist AZ; OSHA 24-Hour HAZWOPER/ 8 Hour Refresher;

Hazardous Waste Operation Supervisor Training;

Resume: Oliver Sullivan Resume

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Answer all questions thoroughly in the spaces provided. Complete this form in full for each one of the key personnel proposed to be involved in performing the Services. Insert or attach a separate resume as applicable, but any attached resumes are supplemental to this form and do not substitute for this form. If there are more than three (3) Key Personnel, 2 Name: Daniel Pike Job title: Assistant Project Manager company: 9 years Length of time in current role: 4 years

Proposed percentage of overall time to be dedicated to the Services: 40 % If applicable, length of time in related experience with large local, state or federal government agencies: 9 years

Proposed position with regard to the Services: Professional Level III

Proposed primary responsibilities with regard to the Services:

Conduct Phase I ESAs, site visits, data collection, report writing, Phase II ESAs, field investigations, sampling, data acquisition, research and draft/final report writing.

Describe experience in performing Services similar to those that are to be assigned:

Mr. Pike is a Registered Professional Engineer with 10 years of experience in conducting Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), leaking underground storage tank (LUST) characterization, remediation and risk assessment. He is an expert in the areas of field site visits for Phase I ESAs, identifying recognized environmental conditions, data collection and review, remediation system design and optimization and risk. He has conducted Phase I and II ESA for small private clients, banks and lenders, large corporations and small to large public entities throughout the US. He also has experience completing environmental compliance audits and Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans for private and public sector clients.

Specific Brownfields Experience – Assisted with Brownfields projects on behalf of the cities of Phoenix and Tempe. Included development of site inventory lists, Phase I and II ESAs, Sampling and Analysis Plans, and health and safety plans.

List job-related certifications, training, and education:

Professional Engineer No. AZ 70272; Professional Engineer NM No. 27099; 40-Hour OSHA HAZWOPER; HAZWOPER 8 Hour Annual Refresher; First Aid; CPR and AED SafeLand USA - Basic Orientation; MSHA B.S., Environmental Science, University of Arizona, 2012 M.S., Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, 2014

Resume: Daniel Pike resume

Assessment Services

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Answer all questions thoroughly in the spaces provided. Complete this form in full for each one of the key personnel proposed to be involved in performing the Services. Insert or attach a separate resume as applicable, but any attached resumes are supplemental to this form and do not substitute for this form. If there are more than three (3) Key Personnel, 3 Name: Zachary Kushlan Job title: Assistant Project Manager company: 2 years Length of time in current role: 2 years

Proposed percentage of overall time to be dedicated to the Services: 40 % If applicable, length of time in related experience with large local, state or federal government agencies: 6 years

Proposed position with regard to the Services: 2

Proposed primary responsibilities with regard to the Services:

Conduct Phase I ESAs, site visits, data collection, report writing, Phase II ESAs, field investigations, sampling, data acquisition, research and draft/final report writing.

Describe experience in performing Services similar to those that are to be assigned:

Mr. Kushlan is an environmental professional with six (6) years of experience in conducting Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), landfill engineering and operations, field sampling and report preparation. He is highly experienced at conducting Phase I ESAs and routinely performs all tasks to include historical review of the property usage back to the first developed use, agency record review for indications of use or release of possible contaminants, site visit to assess the site for evidence of releases of contaminants, and interviews with individuals who have knowledge of the current and past use of the property. Mr. Kushlan routinely conducts Phase I and II ESA throughout the UIS for a variety of private and public clients. He is also highly experienced with Experimental Eddy Covariance Reports, Emissions Inventory (EI) Reports, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reports and Annual Title V permitting reports

Specific Brownfields Experience – Assisted with Brownfields projects on behalf of the cities of Phoenix and Tempe. Included development of site inventory lists, Phase I and II ESAs, Sampling and Analysis Plans, and health and safety plans.

List job-related certifications, training, and education:

40-Hour OSHA HAZWOPER, Occupational Safety & Health Administration;

8 Hour HAZWOPER Supervisor Training , OSHA Manager of Landfill Operations (MOLO--Training Only), Solid Waste Association of North America B.S., Chemical Engineering, University of Arizona, 2018

Resume: Zachary Kushlan Resume

Ryan D. Dunning Vice President

Mr. Dunning is a Principal Geologist with 30 years of experience in matters involving environmental and earth science. Mr. Dunning is responsible for technical program development and management, QA/QC technical review, technical staff training and administration, cost and schedule control, and client development and relations. He is experienced in environmental due diligence, due care, petroleum and industrial site investigation and remediation, UST management and corrective action, asbestos management, regulatory compliance and permitting, and facility decommissioning.

Additionally, Mr. Dunning has extensive experience associated with environmental real estate issues and brownfield redevelopment.

He managed and performed numerous development feasibility studies for various clients including national retail chains, developers, and property owners. The studies included reviewing zoning code requirements, site plan submittal schedule and provisions, costs associated with various municipal regulations and utilities connections, meetings with municipal planners and officials, and numerous other development related issues. Application of these studies is particularly useful on brownfields redevelopment projects.

Mr. Dunning managed and performed hundreds of Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) across the country and in Canada for a variety of clients, including local governments, real estate developers, lending institutions, solid waste and mining companies, manufacturers, and utilities. Mr. Dunning is skilled in using these services to advise clients in general due diligence and risk management, environmental liability management, brownfields redevelopment and site triage, and mergers and acquisitions strategy.

Mr. Dunning managed and performed numerous asbestos building inspections for a variety of clients, including real estate developers, construction and demolition companies, lending institutions, and individual property owners. When necessary for renovation or demolition purposes, oversight and management of abatement activities have been completed as well.

He has managed underground storage tank removal and remediation projects for various petroleum and commercial companies at filling stations, bulk fuel plants, and commercial/industrial sites. Specific duties included work plan preparation, supervision and coordination of installation, removal, and remediation activities, coordination of numerous waste streams, verification sampling, and regulatory reporting, permitting, and communication.

30 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION

B.S., Geology, Eastern Michigan University, EXPERTISE

Project Management

Due Diligence and Feasibility Studies

Site Investigation and Remediation

Brownfields Redevelopment

Underground Storage Tank Management

Asbestos/Mold Management

CERTIFICATIONS

Class A/B UST Operator, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Asbestos Building Inspector, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

(AHERA)

Certified Storm Water Operator - Industrial Site, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

TRAINING

ASTM Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) Applied at Petroleum Release Sites Training

40-Hour OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 & Annual Refreshers

Confined Space OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146

ASTM Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial Real Estate

Ryan D. Dunning Vice President

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Public Sector | Municipal Brownfields Grant Assistance, City of Troy, MI Managed the procurement of brownfield funding to assist with the redevelopment of a brownfield site into a national bank branch in Troy, Michigan. Mr. Dunning managed the preparation of a Brownfield Plan, which was submitted to the Brownfield Redevelopment Authority and approved. As part of the plan, the City of Troy allocated $481,000 through tax increment financing to fund demolition, due care activities, and remediation of metals and hydrocarbon contaminated soil and geotechnically unsuitable fill. Mr. Dunning has since overseen these activities and the site has been successfully redeveloped.

Public Sector | State Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study for Chlorinated Solvents Contaminated Site, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Hillsdale, MI Conducted a geophysical investigation and large-scale remedial investigation to address a chlorinated solvents plume nearly 2,000 feet long for the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality in Hillsdale, Michigan. Prepared a Part 213 Final Assessment Report and Focused Feasibility Analysis. Designed a remediation system for the groundwater contamination consisting of an ozone sparging system, groundwater collection trenches, a groundwater "pump and treat" system, and installation of an impermeable "slurry wall" to stop contaminated groundwater migration. Mr. Dunning prepared a biddable specification package, to be distributed for an open bid, to remediate 15,000 tons of contaminated soil, remove USTs, and install new drinking water wells at two residences. Mr. Dunning also provided engineering oversight and management during the remediation activities.

Public Sector | County Remedial Investigation and Design, Detroit/Wayne County Metropolitan Airport, Romulus, MI Performed remedial investigations and remediations on 35 individual properties with soil and groundwater contamination in Romulus, Michigan to facilitate the development of a fourth runway, a new access road, and a new terminal for the Detroit/Wayne County Metropolitan Airport. These sites included leaking UST sites, hazardous waste sites, and a landfill.

Real Estate | Retail 31 Phase I ESAs on a Retail Gas Station/C-Store Portfolio, Citizens Bank, Southern and Central TX Role: Principal Coordinated and managed Phase I ESAs on a portfolio of retail gas station/C-stores within a three-week timeframe to facilitate financing by a National Lender. The ESAs included a review of regulatory files pertaining to every UST system and an Operational Compliance Review to identify potential operations and maintenance deficiencies indicative of potential releases. The reports included recommendations and cost estimates to correct compliance issues.

Divestiture Due Diligence for a Major Restaurant Portfolio, Eastern U.S., Confidential, Eastern U.S.

Role: Principal Coordinated and co-managed a team of over 30 professionals to complete Phase I ESAs and ALTA surveys on 151 restaurants across the eastern half of the U.S. for a large law firm to assist in positioning the portfolio for sale. Once the initial Phase I ESAs were completed, several properties were identified for Phase II ESAs, which involved geophysical surveys and subsurface investigations to evaluate the potential extent of soil and groundwater impact. Risk associated with identified impact was evaluated and recommendations were developed to manage potential liability associated with a property transaction. The project was completed within two months and all 151 properties were successfully sold.

Real Estate | Industrial

Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study of 45-Acre Industrial Site, Battle Creek, MI Performed a remedial investigation on a large industrial property in Battle Creek, Michigan. Installed 140 soil borings and 80 monitoring wells on the 45-acre industrial site to define extent of metals and chlorinated solvent contamination in soil and groundwater. Conducted a 24 hour aquifer pump test. Interpreted and compiled hydrogeologic data from the onsite wells to determine aquifer performance and groundwater contamination distribution. Prepared a Remedial Action Plan, including a feasibility study of various remediation methods that facilitated the reuse of the site as research and development facility for a Fortune 500 company without major remediation expenditures.

John Burton Project Manager III

John has more than 27 years of environmental experience. of experience in performing

Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), site investigation, remediation and regulatory compliance. He has provided these services to a variety of clients to include government (city, county, state), real estate developers, banks, retail, commercial and manufacturers. Mr. Burton is highly experienced in field investigation of fuel and oil releases to both soil and groundwater. He has conducted dozens of field investigations using backhoes, hollow-stem auger drill rigs, dual wall percussion drill rigs, hammer drill rigs, direct push drill rigs, ground penetrating radar, and various manual sampling techniques. He has also managed and prepared site characterization reports, status reports, site closure reports, and UST removal and reporting. Mr. Burton has completed and/or managed Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) on behalf of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Arizona Department of

Transportation, Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs, Maricopa

County, Pima County, Santa Cruz County, and the Cities of Phoenix, Mesa, and

Tucson. Mr. Burton is a former compliance officer and hydrologist for ADEQ and has extensive knowledge of State and federal statutes and regulations.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Site Inventory & Phase I ESA - City of Tempe Completed a site inventory and Phase I ESA for Tempe’s Brownfields program. The site inventory list consisted of three designated corridor areas and included a regulatory database search, site visit, collection of photos and GPS points. A final list was submitted in Excel format with a prior ranking of high to low. A Phase I ESA resulted from the inventory and in accordance with ASTM Practice E1527-21. The final report identified several recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with historical industrial and light industrial uses at the property. A scope of work was approved for additional activities and a Sampling and Analysis Plan submitted for EPA approval. The team utilized the U.S. EPA Region 9 Brownfields Guidance and Template to develop the SAP. Phase II ESA activities are pending approval of the SAP by the EPA. The Phase II ESA activities are pending site access and will include assessment of a historic septic, auto salvage area and form pesticide mixing area.

City of Tucson Quality Assurance Project Plan QAPP Technical Lead for the development of two Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) on behalf of the City of Tucson for two separate Brownfields Grant. The first QAPP was completed as part of the City’s Community-Wide Assessment Grant and specifically addressed assessment of sites impacted with hazardous substances and petroleum products. This QAPP specifically focused on the Phase I and II ESA process. The second QAPP was developed as part of the City’s Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Grant that provides funding for the cleanup and remediation of sites impacted with hazardous substances and petroleum products. Sites approved for the RLF Grant were to already have been through the Phase II and II ESA process and areas of impact clearly defined.

Each QAPP was developed in accordance with EPA requirements/guidance and received review and final approval.

27 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

B.S., Environmental Science, Slippery Rock

University, 1996

Phase I & II Environmental Site

Assessments

Leaking Underground Storage Tank

Investigations

Leaking Underground Storage Tank

Remediation

Leaking Underground Storage Tank

Risk Assessments

Spill Prevention, Control and

Countermeasures Plans

CERTIFICATIONS

OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER and 8-

Hour Refresher, Current

AHERA Building Inspector, AHERA

EPA Certified Lead Inspector, EPA

John Burton

Brownfields Site Inventory: City of Avondale – Project Manager and technical lead for the development of the City of Avondale’s Brownfields site inventory list as part of the Rio Reimagined Brownfields Assessment Coalition Grant. The specific areas for the Avondale inventory list focused included areas within the Agua Fria and Gila River corridor. Specific activities first consisted of a clear scope of work and outlining parameters of how the inventory list was to be developed. The inventory included a regulatory review within each corridor, preparing a spreadsheet with desired information, field verification of potential sites to include site photos and research of property ownership. The final deliverable consisted of an excel spreadsheet with properties ranked for potential Brownfields assessment. Follow up activities included providing GPS data for target properties for inclusion into Avondale’s Geographic Information System database.

Two Phase I ESAs: City of Tolleson – Project Manager for two Phase I ESAs completed on behalf of the City of Tolleson.

Activities included development of a scope of work for a partial property take at 9552 W. Van Buren St. and assessment of the old City Hall building at 9555 W. Van Buren St. in Tolleson. Each Phase I ESA was completed in accordance with ASTM 1527-21 and consisted of a regulatory records review, site reconnaissance of each property, property owner questionnaire and a final report. No Recognized Environmental Condition was identified for either property.

Brownfields Phase I and II ESA/Reporting; City of Mesa – Project Manager as part of The City’s Brownfield grant included assessment of properties associated with expansion of the light rail system within Mesa. Activities included development of scope of work for each task assignment, Phase I/II ESAs and reporting. Over 30 Phase I ESAs were completed and 5 Phase II ESAs as part of this project. The Phase I ESAs were conducted in accordance with ASTM1527-13 and included assessment of whole property and partial property acquisition.