B08_Attachment_4_PPQ_Peirce_HVAC_DEWA.pdf

PDF 142 KB Posted

Attached to
DEWA REPLACE HVAC SYSTEM PEIRCE HOUSE Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P4524R0009
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service Northeast Region

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) related to a federal contract opportunity to replace the HVAC system at the Peirce House for the Department of the Interior, National Park Service Northeast Region.

The PPQ is to be completed by the project owner/evaluator providing an assessment of the offeror's past performance on a previous project. The evaluation includes ratings on factors such as relationship with the client, quality control, schedule performance, and overall satisfaction. The offeror is required to submit between 3-5 PPQs as part of their proposal package for the DEWA Replace HVAC System Peirce House contract, Solicitation Number 140P4524R0009. The contract is being awarded by the Department of the Interior, National Park Service Northeast Region. The PPQ must be received by the specified date and time in the solicitation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DEWA REPLACE HVAC SYSTEM PEIRCE HOUSE, newest first.
File Type Posted
Pre-Bid_MeetingParticipating_0003.pdf PDF
Questions_and_answers_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P4524R0009_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P4524R0009_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P4524R0009_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P4524R0009.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_1_SOW_Peirce_HVAC_DEWA.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_5_Price_Schedule_Peirce_HVAC_DEWA.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_3_WD_PA20240103_4-5-2024_Replace_HVAC_DEWA.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_2_Drawings_Peirce_HVAC_DEWA.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Department of Interior Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

DEWA – Replace HVAC Peirce House – 140P4524R0009

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is considering the company listed below in Section A for a project opportunity - Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance.

Instructions:

1) The offeror is to complete only the information in Section A, then send the entire past performance questionnaire to project owner/evaluator for completion.

2) The project owner/evaluator (or reference) is to complete Section B, then send the entire past performance questionnaire back to the offeror to be provided with their complete proposal package, which will then be reviewed for evaluation.

3) The past performance questionnaire must be received by the contracting point of contact by the date and time specified in the solicitation (or any amendments). Please note that for electronic submissions, offerors should consider and account for potential delays in transmissions between when an electronic submission is submitted and when an electronic submission is received. Late past performance questionnaires will not be accepted.

4) One past performance questionnaire is to be used for each past performance project submitted. The offeror may submit between 3-5 past performance questionnaires for this solicitation. Past performance projects must have been completed within five years of the completion of performance of the evaluated contract or order.

Section A

Project Title:

Location:

Description:

Company Name: Unique Entity ID/Cage Code:

Owner/Project Manager Name: Email Address:

Start Date: Completion Date:

Initial Amount: Final Amount:

Section B Evaluator

Evaluator Name: Company/Agency Name:

Address: POC Email:

Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:

Ratings Overview Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.

“O” Outstanding Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements.

“A” Above Average Performance exceeded the contract requirements.

“S” Satisfactory Performance met the contract requirements.

“M” Marginal Performance met the minimum contract requirements but

Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.

“U” Unacceptable Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.

Questionnaire Please select the appropriate rating and provide supporting information for the following questions.

1. The relationship between the company and client’s/customer’s contract team:

O

A

S

M

U

2. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct:

3. Quality control:

4. Ability to meet the performance schedule:

5. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain:

Yes

No

6. Would you award another contract to the company being evaluated? If no, please explain:

7. Was the customer satisfied with the final product and services? If no, please explain:

8. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?

9. Overall Rating

10. Comments

Evaluator Signature

Name

Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .