B08_140P5122Q0075_RFQ_Attch_0005_PPQ_VICK_Veg_Removal_-_Tree_Pruning_and_Removal.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P5122Q0075
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for tree thinning and hazard tree removal services at Vicksburg National Military Park in Mississippi. The opportunity is a request for quotations seeking proposals for removal of woody vegetation from select battlefield areas and pruning or removing hazard trees at various park sites. Interested parties must have a valid Unique Entity ID and Cage Code and be registered in the System for Award Management. Insurance of at least $200,000 per person, $500,000 per occurrence, and $20,000 per property is required. The contract will be a firm-fixed-price award made to the responsible bidder offering the best value using lowest-priced technically acceptable procedures. The North American Industry Classification code is 115310 for support activities for forestry. Proposals are due by the closing date specified in RFQ 140P5122Q0075.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ #140P5122Q0075 - Attachment 0005
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation#140P5122Q0075 Please complete this Questionnaire and Submit with your Proposal
We are currently in the process of preparing our quote for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf, Solicitation Number: 140P5122Q0075 for removal of woody vegetation from select areas within the battlefield and hazard tree pruning/removal from various sites within Vicksburg National Military Park Vicksburg, MS. As part of our quote, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and submit with your proposal to: edward_dingle@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to prior to the closing of RFP #140P5122Q0075.
Alternate POC name:
Alternate POC phone number:
Alternate POC e-mail address:
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: ________________________ Fax: _____________________
E-Mail: _______________________
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number:
2. Contract Value:
3. Period of Performance:
4. Brief description of items provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
Title: Phone:
E-mail:
mailto:Please%20complete%20this%20Questionnaire%20and%20e-mail%20to%20edward_dingle@nps.gov mailto:Please%20complete%20this%20Questionnaire%20and%20e-mail%20to%20Contracting%20Officer,%20e-mail:%20edward_dingle@nps.gov mailto:edward_dingle@nps.gov
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Work
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| I. Current or Historical Contract Information CONTRACT REFERENCED: |
| II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. |
| Past Performance Evaluation Question 1. Performance |
| Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness |
| Question 4. Quality of Work |
| Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance |
| General Comments: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .