Attachment C - Evaluation Matrix - PGC-HH1-01-26 PGC Auditorium.xlsx

This is an evaluation matrix used by a selection committee for the PGC Auditorium Renovations project (PGC-HH1-01-26) to score and compare proposals submitted by Professional Commissioning Agent (CxA) firms. The evaluation framework consists of two primary scoring components: a technical submission section worth 900 points and a cost submission section worth 100 points, with selection based on the highest combined score. The technical evaluation assesses five key areas: CxA Prior Experience (200 points), Understanding of Project Requirements (210 points), Geographic Proximity (60 points), Project Work Plan (315 points), and Contractor Personnel and Qualifications (115 points). Each scoring category includes specific sub-criteria with defined scoring methodologies, ranging from percentage-based increments to fixed point allocations based on proposal quality and compliance.

The cost evaluation awards 100 points to the lowest-cost proposal, with remaining proposals pro-rated using a formula that penalizes proposals exceeding twice the lowest fee submitted. The scoring committee has discretion to customize evaluation weights and scoring percentages within defined ranges to align with project-specific priorities. The evaluation matrix requires three independent scorers to assess each proposal, with their individual percentage scores aggregated to produce raw scores that are then pro-rated against the highest-scoring proposal to generate comparable scores across all submissions. Notably, there is a discrepancy between the stated project scope (PGC Auditorium Renovations) and the related contract opportunity description, which references PennDOT and digital video network content, suggesting a potential documentation inconsistency.