Attachment 7- Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 260 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Preventative Maintenance of Electrical Equipment Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911KF-21-Q-0022
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on a solicitation from the Anniston Army Depot for carbide inserts. The questionnaire requests information on previous contracts held by the contractor including contract number, dates, value, type of contract and description of project requirements. Ratings are solicited on a scale of excellent, good, adequate, marginal and poor for customer satisfaction, schedule, technical processes, technical requirements, technical responsiveness, quality control and an overall assessment. The contractor is asked to provide a point of contact and narrative justification for any ratings assigned.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal for preventative maintenance of electrical equipment at the Anniston Army Depot. The work involves inspection and maintenance of electrical equipment per NFPA 70B and Army regulations, completed per manufacturer specifications and contract requirements.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7- Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4-Drawings - System Mapping.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2-Appendix A with Building List.pdf | ||
| 21-Q-0022.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8- Wage Determination 2015-4588.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9-Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).pdf | ||
| Attachment 6-AFARS Apendix DD.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3-Drawings - Site and Floor Plans.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1- Statement of Work - 5-11-21.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Appendix B - F.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
This Questionnaire relates to the solicitation requirements for Carbide Inserts located at the
Anniston Army Depot.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – W911KF-20-Q-0015
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail or send by facsimile [FAX: 256-235-6353]
Director of Contracting
Anniston Army Depot
7 Frankford Ave.
Anniston, AL 36201-4199
ATTN: Lakeeta Beavers, Contract Specialist
Phone: 256-240-3196
E-mail: lakeeta.t.beaverselridge.civ@mail.mil
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
Proposed prime contractor
1. OFFEROR NAME OFFEROR ADDRESS
Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire
2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:
mailto:lakeeta.t.beaverselridge.civ@mail.mil
8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:
Company/Agency Name and Address:
Name of person completing this questionnaire:
Title:
Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:
Phone Number:
E-Mail:
Rating Scale:
EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.
GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.
ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.
MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance.
Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.
POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.
UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.
9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to
Detail and Quality Assurance.
A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.
B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.
C. Technical Processes – Assess the contractor’s adherence to sound construction processes and practices, including safety and environmental:
D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to specifications:
E. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:
Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown
F. Quality Control – Assess the contractor’s adherence to sound quality processes and practices.
G. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .