Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 56 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USDA FS LEI R13 Zone 9 Vehicle Upfitting
- Solicitation number
- 12318724Q0303
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Request for Quote (RFQ) #12318724Q0303 for USDA FS R13-LEI Emergency Vehicle Upfitting. The questionnaire is to be completed by the contracting activity responsible for the referenced projects and furnished directly to the Contract Specialist. It requests information on the contractor's performance in areas such as quality of product/service, program management and timeliness, and cost control. The respondent is asked to rate the contractor's performance as Acceptable, Neutral, or Unacceptable, and provide a narrative summary of the contractor's strengths, weaknesses, and overall customer satisfaction. The related federal contract opportunity is for the USDA Forest Service Law Enforcement & Investigation Program to upfit various types of duty vehicles in accordance with Forest Service standards and specifications. The contractor will provide all parts, materials, and pickup/delivery services.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
| United States | Forest | Washington Office | 201 14th St, SW |
| Department of | Service | Procurement & | Washington, DC 20250 |
| Agriculture | Property Services |
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS
Source Selection Information – SEE FAR 3.104 – For Official Use Only
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Request for Proposal# 12318724Q0303
Past performance information is required for technical evaluation of quotes submitted in response to Request for Quote# 12318724Q0303- USDA FS R13-LEI Emergency Vehicle Upfitting. The Offeror shall ensure that a Past Performance Questionnaire is completed for each project referenced in their quote. The questionnaire is to be completed by the contracting activity (e.g., owners, clients, and prime contractors) responsible for the particular projects, and furnished by the completing party directly and solely to the following individuals:
Drackus Thomas, Contract Specialist USDA FS WO-PPS, National Contracts Branch Email: drackus.thomas@usda.gov
MARK FOR: USDA FS LE&I Patrol Vehicle Upfit
RFP: 12318724Q0303
Past Performance Information
Section I. Contractor Identification / Contract Information (to be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor Name / Address:
Contractor Key Personnel:
Program Name:
Client:
| Contract/Order Number: |
| Check: ( ) Prime ( ) Sub |
| Contract Award Date: |
| Contract Completion Date: |
Contract Type: ( ) FFP ( ) Cost ( ) T&M/LH ( ) Other (Specify):
Competitive:
( ) Yes ( ) No If no, Set-Aside Type / Rationale:
Contract Value at Award:
Current Contract Value:
Contract Value Upon Completion:
Complexity:
Descriptions of Services:
Section II. Evaluation Ratings
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. The rating scale is defined as follows:
ACCEPTABLE (A)
The past performance record represents that the Offeror is capable of adequately performing the requirement. This rating indicates a low level of performance risk to the Government.
NEUTRAL (N)
Indicates that the Offerors references could not be verified or that the Offeror lacks relevant past performance experience.
UNACCEPTABLE (U)
Indicates that the Offeror has historically failed to perform in a satisfactory manner in the fulfillment of like or similar requirements. This rating indicates an unacceptable level of performance risk.
SECTION III: EVALUATION FACTORS
| 1. Quality of Product or Service |
| A |
| N |
| U |
Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements.
Effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.
Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that improved the product or service which benefited the customer.
2. Program Management and Timeliness
| A |
| N |
| U |
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
| 3. Cost Control |
| A |
| N |
| U |
Accuracy in forecasting contract costs.
Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs.
Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur.
Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting.
Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost of product or service which benefited the customer.
SECTION IV: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
3. Would you hire this contractor in the future to perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
4. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
5. What is your overall customer satisfaction with this Contractor? (Please check) ( ) Acceptable ( ) Neutral ( ) Unacceptable
Reason for rating:
6. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
V. Respondent Information
The following information will assist with the analysis of the data.
| _________________ | _____________________________________________ |
| DATE | SIGNATURE |
TYPED OR PRINTED NAME & TITLE
Agency/company:
Address:
Work number (area code) Your role relative to the project/contract: (Administrative Contracting Officer, Inspector, Contract Administrator, Buyer, Quality Assurance Evaluator, Other - explain) Length of involvement in project/contract:
Do you know anyone else who can provide information regarding this Offeror’s performance (only fill if applicable)?
| ________________________________ | ________________________________ | |
| Name | Phone |
Email address
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN COMPLETING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE
Caring for the Land and Serving People Caring for the Land and Serving People image2.png image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .