Attachment 5 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE 36C24521Q0407.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Washington, DC Home Oxygen Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24521Q0407
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions to solicitation 36C24521Q0407.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24521Q0407 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION Attachment 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| QASP-Home Oxygen .1.docx | DOCX document | |
| CONTRACTOR RULES OF BEHAVIOR Attachment 4.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24521Q0407 08052021.pdf | ||
| P07 Wage Determination 15-4281.txt | TXT text file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 5
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER: 36C24521Q0407
The offeror shall provide the following questionnaire to up to three examples who can attest to the offeror’s performance covering contracts or jobs that are recent, that is within Five years, and relevant, that is of the same type and scope of work. The offeror shall provide a list of these references, including the company/agency name, Point of Contact (POC), and telephone number or email address of the POC as part of their quote in order to be considered for award. Information to substantial the relevancy and recency regarding the references must also be included. Offerors should instruct their chosen references that completed questionnaires must be submitted by the exact date and time specified for receipt of offers, that is, August 24, 2021, 1400 EST, to Crystal S. Hinton, Department of Veterans, VA Medical Center Annex, 209 West Fayette Street, Suite 611 Baltimore, Maryland 21201, email: crystal.hinton@va.gov
PART 1: Shall be completed by the prospective contractor prior to forwarding to prospective Contractor's past performance reference.
1. Prospective Contractor's Name and Address
2. Prospective Contractor's Point of Contact with Name and Title
3. Prospective Contractor's Telephone Number (with area code)
4. Prospective Contractor's E-mail Address and/or facsimile Telephone Number
5. Prospective Contractor's Client, Firm or Government Agency Reference Name and Address
6. Prospective Contractor's Client, Firm or Government Agency Reference Telephone Number (with area code)
7. Contract Number of the Work Performed by the Prospective Contractor for Client, Firm or Government Agency_________________________________________________________
8. Brief Description of Relevancy of Work Involved
9. Contract/Order Period of Performance (list original contract periods such base year and 3 option periods)
PART 2: Shall be completed by Prospective Contractor's Client, Firm or Government Agency Reference.
1. Name and Title of Reference
2. Signature of Reference
3. Date
4. Name of Client, Firm or Government Agency Reference
5. Telephone Number
6. Facsimile Telephone Number
7. Reference E-mail Address
RATING DEFINITIONS FOR BEST VALUE TRADE-OFF:
Outstanding: Substantial confidence based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record. The Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Acceptable: Satisfactory confidence based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record to successfully perform the required effort.
Marginal: Limited confidence based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record; the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unacceptable: No confidence based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record. The Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral: Unknown confidence (neutral). No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
QUALITY OF SERVICES
Evidence of Compliance with Contract Requirements:
Rate the contractor’s compliance with contract terms, conditions or requirements.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
Accuracy of Reports:
Rate the contractor’s accuracy of the contractor reports
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
Technical Excellence:
Rate the contractor’s technical ability.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
Quality Workmanship:
Rate the contractor’s quality of workmanship.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
Resolution of Problems:
Rate the contractor’s ability to resolve any unforeseen problems.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
TIMELINESS OF SERVICE
Delivery schedule:
Rate the contractor’s ability to provide continuous, on-time delivery in accordance with the established delivery schedule.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
BUSINESS RELATIONS
Reasonable and Cooperative Behavior:
Rate the contractor’s reasonable and cooperative behavior.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
Flexibility:
Rate the Contractor’s Flexibility.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
Effective Conflict Resolutions:
Rate the contractor’s ability to resolve conflict.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
Ability to Handle Government Requests for Change:
Rate the contractor’s ability to respond to changes.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
Communication:
Rate the contractor’s communication of performance progress, to include any notification of potential problems.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL RATING:
Rate the contractor’s overall performance.
□ Outstanding
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal
□ Unacceptable
□ Neutral
Comments (Optional):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .