Attachment_4_-_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
USCGC MUNRO DS
Solicitation number
140D0422Q0962
Issued by

About this file

This document is a combined synopsis and solicitation requesting quotes for ship repair services. The United States Coast Guard Surface Forces Logistics Center is seeking a contractor to perform below-dockside repairs and alterations to the Coast Guard Cutter Munro as detailed in Attachment 1 from March 14, 2023 to June 2, 2023 at the USCG Base in Alameda, California. This is a 100% small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 336611 and PSC code J999. Quotes are due by January 13, 2023 and award will be made on or around that same date. The period of performance is from March 14, 2023 to June 2, 2023. The Department of the Interior and Interior Business Center are issuing this solicitation on behalf of the Coast Guard.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_0003_0003.docx DOCX document
Class_Brand_Name_Justification_USCG_Redacted_0002.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002_0002.docx DOCX document
B09_SA-_MUNRO_Questions_0002.docx DOCX document
MUNRO_Q_A_0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Price_Schedule_0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0001_0001.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Price_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_MUNRO.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_NDA.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Specifications.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation 140D0422Q0962

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Offeror:___________________________________________________________________

B. Agency/Customer:___________________________________________________________

C. Contract Title:______________________________________________________________

D. Contract number: ____________________________________________________________

E. Contract type: _______________________________________________________________

F. Award Date: ________________________________________________________________

G. Completion Date: ____________________________________________________________

H. Contract Value:

Initial: _____________________________________________
Final: ______________________________________________

I. Period of performance: _______________________________________________________

J. Offeror Role (Prime or Sub): __________________________________________________

K. Government Point of Contact:

Name:________________________________________________________
Email Address:_________________________________________________
Telephone Number:_____________________________________________

L. Project Description

SECTION 2: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
O
OUTSTANDING - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that was significantly in excess of anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example to others, so that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent”.
E
EXCELLENT – The contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements.
G
GOOD – There are no, or very minimal issues and the contractor has met the contract requirements.
F
FAIR – Overall compliance requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
P
POOR – Overall compliance requires significant agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
U
UNSATISFACTORY – Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements.
N
NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score
Quality of Product or Service
O
E
G
F
P
U
N

Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

Effectiveness of assigned personnel in terms of the appropriate mix of education and experience to accomplish the requirement.

Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program

Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

Program Management, Timeliness of Performance & Business Relations
O
E
G
F
P
U
N

Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

Transition/Phase-in & Employee Retention/Attraction
O
E
G
F
P
U
N

Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

Cost Control
O
E
G
F
P
U
N

Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

Government Contracts Only: has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___Default___Convenience___Pending Terminations___
No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 3: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this form to the contractor that has submitted for evaluation, they will provide with their proposal submission.

If uncomfortable with providing directly to the contractor, please submit a copy to:

Stephanie McCullough, stephanie_mccullough@ibc.doi.gov

And

Matthew Perlich, matthew_perlich@ibc.doi.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .