Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PAD Medical Coders and Transcription Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HT001424R0004
- Issued by
- Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire template for a medical coding and transcription services contract opportunity with the Defense Health Agency. The questionnaire requests ratings and comments on a contractor's past performance on a range of criteria including relationship management, subcontractor oversight, staffing, management integrity, quality, schedule adherence, cost control, compliance, and documentation. Respondents are asked to provide an overall rating and are advised that contractors may respond to any adverse comments. The related federal contract opportunity is for PAD medical coding and transcription services with Solicitation Number HT001424R0004 and is being issued by the Defense Health Agency. Response dates are requested by January 10, 20234.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HT001424R0004-0003.pdf | ||
| HT001424R0004 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Price Proposal Workbook rvsd2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HT001424R0004 RFP Q and A 22Dec2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - PWS for PAD Medical Coders 22Dec2023.pdf | ||
| HT001424R0004 Conformed Copy 22Dec2023.pdf | ||
| HT001424R0004-0001.pdf | ||
| HT001424R0004 Conformed Copy.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Price Proposal Workbook rvsd.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HT001424R0004 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| RFP Q and A 12-08-23.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - PWS for PAD Medical Coders 8Dec2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Past Performance Information Form (PPIF).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 - Past Performance Recipient List.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HT001424R0004
Attachment 4 7 8 December 2023
Attachment 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Defense Health Agency Contracting Activity (DHACA) Northeastern Markets Contracting Division (NM-DC) is considering the Offeror listed below for a U.S. Government contract. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance.
After completing this PPQ, you are highly encouraged to send it back to the Offeror to be submitted with their quote. However, you may return it directly to this office via email to rosalynd.d.clayton.ctr@health.mil and mariajaine.a.sipin.civ@health.mil no later than 10 January 20234.
Your prompt response is greatly appreciated. If the referenced project is a Government project, you may forward a copy of the official performance evaluation in lieu of completing this form.
Thank you for your assistance in this source selection. If you have any questions, please contact Rosalynd Clayton at rosalynd.d.clayton.ctr@health.mil or (703)275-6347.
THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
Offeror Information
Name of Offeror Being Evaluated:
Address of Offeror Being Evaluated:
Cage Code:
Point of Contact (POC):
Project Information
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number:
Contract/Project Title:
Location:
Award Date:
Completion Date:
Contract Value:
| Offeror Performed As: |
| |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub-Contractor |
Description of Work Performed:
Evaluator Information
Name of Evaluator:
Government Agency/Commercial Company:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Position Held in Relation to this Project:
Rating: Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation.
DO NOT RATE ON A “+” OR “-” SCALE. If a “+” or “-” is used, the rating without the “+” or “-” will be applied. If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
| “E” |
| Exceptional |
| Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “VG” |
| Very Good |
| Performance exceeded the contract requirements. |
| “S” |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met the contract requirements. |
| “M” |
| Marginal |
| Performance met the minimum contract requirements, but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory. |
| “U” |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements. |
| “NA” |
| Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract. |
Please rate and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:
| 1. The relationship between the Offeror and client’s/customer’s contract team: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 2. The Offeror’s management and coordination of subcontractors: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 3. Ability/actions to hire and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees for the performance of the contract work: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 4. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 5. Quality of work: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 6. Quality control: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 7. Ability to meet the performance schedule: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 8. Ability/actions to improve schedule problems, if applicable: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 9. Ability to control costs and provide the required work at a reasonable total price: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 10. Compliance with labor standards, as applicable: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 11. Compliance with safety standards and/or number of safety related incidents, code compliance, as applicable: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 12. Ability to submit required documentation (work schedule, reports, data, etc.) in a timely manner: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U NA
| 13. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain: |
| |_| |_| |
Yes No
| 14. Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from your procurement or technical personnel? If no, please explain: |
| |_| |_| |
Yes No
| 15. Would you award another contract to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain: |
| |_| |_| |
Yes No
| 16. Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain: |
| |_| |_| |
Yes No
| 17. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results? |
| |_| |_| |_| |
Yes No NA
18. Additional Remarks:
| 19. Overall rating for this firm: |
| |_| |_| |_| |_| |_| |
E VG S M U
Signature of Evaluator Date
PLEASE NOTE: Contractors may be advised of adverse remarks and given the opportunity to respond in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requirements. However, in accordance with FAR 15.306(e)(4), the names of individuals providing reference information about an Offeror’s past performance shall not be disclosed.
Past Performance Questionnaire, Page 1 of 3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .