Attachment 3) Proposal Package Letter and PP.docx
DOCX document 61 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Housing unit repairs at Cape Hatteras NC
- Solicitation number
- 140P5520R0014
About this file
This solicitation package requests proposals for the repair of four employee housing units at Cape Hatteras National Seashore in North Carolina. The National Park Service seeks to award a firm-fixed price construction contract with a period of performance of 180 days. Interested contractors are to attend a mandatory pre-proposal site visit on June 16, 2020 and submit proposals by June 29, 2020. The work will be completed in accordance with the statement of work, Davis-Bacon wage determination, and terms and conditions provided. A bid guarantee of 20% is required with proposals. This acquisition has a 100% small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 236118 and size standard of $36.5 million.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Site Visit Sign-in June 16_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P5520R0014_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1a_Revised Statement of Work_0001.pdf | ||
| Q and A_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3a_Revised Price Schedule_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P5520R0014_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2) Wage Determinations.pdf | ||
| READ THIS FIRST.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1) SOW.pdf | ||
| RFP Provisions and UCF1 Clauses.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5520R0014.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Cape Hatteras National Seashore
Solicitation #140P5520R0014
Project Title:
Repair four (4) employee housing units on Ocracoke Island, NC
PMIS #254055
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP)
Proposal Submission Package
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf
For Technical Volume I:
1. Past Performance Questionnaire
For Business & Price Volume II:
1. Contract Price Schedule
2. General References
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.
A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
| Company Name |
| Company |
| Street Address |
| Address |
| City |
| City |
| State |
| State |
| Zip Code |
| XXXXX |
| DUNS Number |
| XXXXXXX |
| Point of Contact |
| Name, Email, Phone |
B. CONTRACT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Contract Number |
| XXXXXXXXXX |
| Contract Type |
| Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other |
| Awarded Contract Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Current / Final Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Contract Award Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Contract Completion Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Period of Performance |
| XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX |
| Project Location |
| Park or Street address, City, State |
| Client / Owner |
| Company |
| Brief description of the contract & work effort: |
| Scope of work description |
C. REFERENCE:
| Name |
| First, Last |
| Position / Title |
| Title |
| Organization |
| Agency or Company |
| Phone Number |
| XXX-XXX-XXXX |
| Email Address |
| Signature |
| Signature |
| Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
D. EVALUATION
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Evaluation Area |
| Rating |
Quality
| Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of informational and technical submittals? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Quality Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Schedule (& Time Management)
| Met project schedule milestones? |
| Choose an item. |
| Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? |
| Choose an item. |
| Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly addressed scheduling issues? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Cost Control
| Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? |
| Choose an item. |
| Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? |
| Choose an item. |
| Submitted accurate and complete invoices? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Cost Control Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Management
| General oversight by project manager and superintendent? |
| Choose an item. |
| Coordination with and control of subcontractors? |
| Choose an item. |
| Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? |
| Choose an item. |
| Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? |
| Choose an item. |
| Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Management Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)
| Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? |
| Choose an item. |
| Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Regulatory Compliance
| Met building and life safety codes? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Recommendation: |
| Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Comments: |
E. RETURN:
| Return by |
| Monday, June 29, 2020 |
| Name |
| Lara Wood |
| Title |
| Contracting Officer |
| Organization |
| National Park Service – Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf |
| Lara_Wood@nps.gov |
CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE
SOLICITATION NUMBER: 140P5520R0014
PARK - PMIS: Cape Hatteras National Seashore (CAHA) - #254055
LOCATION: Ocracoke Island Housing and Maintenance area, 89 NPS Road, Ocracoke Island, NC
PROJECT TITLE: Repair (4) four employee housing units Notice: Offerors are required to submit, a minimum, an offer that conforms to the solicitation documents with pricing for Base line item. Failure to do so may render the proposal unacceptable. On lump-sum line items, provide the total price only. For all unit-priced line items, provide the unit price and the extended total price. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work, include the costs in a related item. In case of error in calculation of extended prices, the unit price governs. In case of summation error, the total corrected amounts govern. Round totals & extended prices to whole dollars.
| PARK: |
| Cape Hatteras National Seashore |
| LOCATION: |
| Ocracoke Island, NC |
PROJECT TITLE:
CAHA 254055 – Repair (4) four employee housing units
| ITEM |
| DESCRIPTION |
| QTY |
| UNIT |
| TOTAL PRICE |
| Base Item 10 |
| Provide repairs to housing unit #137 under Statement of Work |
| 1 |
| Lump Sum |
| $ |
| Base Item 20 |
| Provide repairs to housing unit #138 under Statement of Work |
| 1 |
| Lump Sum |
| $ |
| Base Item 30 |
| Provide repairs to housing unit #139 under Statement of Work |
| 1 |
| Lump Sum |
| $ |
| Base Item 40 |
| Provide repairs to housing unit #139 under Statement of Work |
| 1 |
| Lump Sum |
| $ |
| Total Contract Amount |
| $ |
| TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT |
| $ |
General References READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to provide the Government with general references in the spaces provided as described in the Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (Section L). Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.
It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their relationships with the references may be considered less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record. Provide explanations on separate sheets as necessary.
Name of Contractor/Offeror:
Surety
Name of Surety:
Address of Surety:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Corporate Bank
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Quantity of Accounts:
Corporate Bank
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Quantity of Accounts:
Insurance Company
Name:
Address:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types of Policies:
Subcontractor
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
Subcontractor
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
Subcontractor
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
Material Supplier
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
Material Supplier
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
MATERIAL Supplier
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
image1.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .