Attachment 13 - QASP - COSR - VLM Maint.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- DDRV Vertical Lift Module Preventative/Corrective Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SP330025Q0030
- Issued by
- Defense Logistics Agency Distribution
About this file
This appears to be a placeholder PDF file that shows an Adobe Reader upgrade message rather than the actual Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) document that was meant to be attached. The file was intended to contain the QASP for a Defense Logistics Agency Distribution contract opportunity (SP330025Q0030) related to Vertical Lift Module Preventative/Corrective Maintenance, but the actual content is not accessible.
The only visible content is a standard Adobe Reader message indicating that the PDF viewer may need to be upgraded to display the document properly, with links to download Adobe Reader for Windows, Mac, or Linux operating systems. No substantive information about the QASP requirements or contract details can be extracted from this file.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| CSS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Schedule of Services.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 - Equipment List.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - DL0584 Visitor Register Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Levels of Maintenance.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9 - DL1818 Visitor Notification Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment 14 - QASP_ DDRV.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 6 - DD2875 System Authorization Access Request.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 - DL1591 Supervisor Mishap Report.pdf | ||
| Attachment 10 - TE 1.1 Contractor Personnel Sec.pdf | ||
| Attachment 11 - TE_1.2_CAC_Procedures.pdf | ||
| Attachment 12 - QASP - CAP - VLM Maint.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Wage Determination No 2015-4331 Rev 29 dtd 12.23.2024.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Please wait...
If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.
You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.
For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.
Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.
Contract Oversight Surveillance Report
1. Contract # / Service
2. Contract Location
3. Contract Performance Period
4. Evaluation Period
5. Contract Service Provider
6. Method(s) of Surveillance (check all that apply for this surveillance period) Requirement Surveillance Comments
Surveillance Methods Described -
- Direct Observation is the visual examination of processes and procedures by an evaluator who is physically present and watching individuals actually performing the work to determine whether the processes conform to the requirements.
- Random Sampling is correctly performed by selecting a statistically significant number of samples from a lot where all members of the lot have the same chance of being selected. Random Sampling is used to reduce the time and effort of validating conformance to requirements when a definable lot of significant size exists.
- 100% Inspection method evaluates all outputs of a particular requirement. Every item in a lot is evaluated for all or some of the characteristics in the specification. (Recommend if Lot Size is 25 or less)
- Validated Customer Complaints are customer complaints that prove to be valid upon subsequent investigation. They can be used as a trigger for conducting surveillances, and are included as a part of the surveillance report. When a valid complaint is received and included in a surveillance activity, strongly consider scheduling targeted follow up surveillance to ensure the problem has been corrected. These can prompt corrective actions, preventative action plans, and performance improvement plans.
7. Overall Surveillance Evaluation
8. Additional Comments / Notes to the Contracting Officer (Either positive or negative)
9. COR/TPOC Certification - I certify that the supplies or services provided by the Service Provider under the terms and conditions of this contract, have been received and accepted unless otherwise noted on this surveillance report.
Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments Requirement Surveillance Comments 10.0.2.20120224.1.869952.867557
| TextField1: ASRS & VLMS Maintenance |
| TextField4: DLA Distribution Richmond, Virginia |
| TextField2: |
| DateField1: |
| DateField2: |
| TextField3: |
| DirectObservation: 0 |
| RandomSampling: 0 |
| Inspection: 0 |
| Complaint: 0 |
| Other: 0 |
| Other_Field: |
| Requirement: 1. Was a preventative maintenance schedule submitted IAW with the contract ? |
| Requirement: 2. Was all preventative maintenance performed IAW submitted proposal and the OEM/Federal guidance? |
| Requirement: 3. Was all corrective maintenance performed IAW the OEM/Federal guidance? |
| Requirement: 4. Did the SP document and submit all work orders IAW the contract? |
| Requirement: 5. Did the SP respond to all corrective maintenance in the required time IAW with the contract? |
| Requirement: 6. Is the SP only using new or like new parts for repairs IAW the contract? |
| Requirement: 7. Is the SP meeting all safety and environmental guidance IAW the contract? |
| Requirement: 8. Is the SP meeting all the requirements of the contract? |
| SurveillanceComments: |
| Conforming: |
| Nonconforming: |
| Outstanding: 0 |
| VeryGood: 0 |
| TextField5: |
| SignatureField1: |
| SignatureField2: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .