Att4_PPQ.pdf

PDF 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Agricultural Water Savings Pilot Study and Consult
Solicitation number
140R3020Q0075
Issued by

About this file

This combined synopsis and solicitation is seeking quotes for agricultural water savings pilot study and consultation services. The Bureau of Reclamation requires a consultant to work collaboratively with stakeholders to explore current methods used to quantify certain agricultural water conservation activities in the Lower Colorado River Basin and recommend approaches to improve quantification methods. The work includes tasks such as developing a study plan and documentation processes. Quotes are due by August 31, 2020 for a requirement valued at a lump sum price. The NAICS code is 541620 and it is set aside for small businesses with a size standard of $16.5 million. The period of performance is September 18 through January 4, 2021 across various Lower Colorado River Basin locations. Evaluation criteria include relevant experience, knowledge, technical approach, past performance, and price.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Att2_PriceSchedule.pdf PDF
Att1_ExhibitA_Reclamation Visual Identity Program.pdf PDF
Att3_WD.pdf PDF
140R3020Q0075_CombinedSynopsisSolicitation_Formatted.pdf PDF
Att1_PWS.pdf PDF
Sol_140R3020Q0075.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

140R3020Q0075 – Agricultural Water Savings Pilot Study and Consultation Attachment 4 – PPQ

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

***NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS***

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Interior Region 8: Lower Colorado Basin, Bureau of Reclamation, Boulder City, NV, is considering the firm listed below. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance.

Past Performance Information:

Name and Address of Firm Being Evaluated:______________________________________

Contract No.:__________________ Type of Contract: _____________________ Project Title:___________________ Date of Award:_________________ Completion Date: _____________________ Location:______________________ Initial Amount:__________________ Final Amount: ________________________ Description:_________________________________________________________________

Evaluator: (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data.)

Name of Evaluator: ______________________________________

Company/Agency Name: ______________________________________

Address: ______________________________________

Phone Number: ______________________________________

Email Address: ______________________________________

Position Held or Function in Relation to Project: ______________________________________

Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the Additional Remarks section of this form.

“O” Outstanding Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements.

“A” Above Average Performance exceeded the contract requirements.

“S” Satisfactory Performance met the contract requirements.

“M” Marginal Performance met the minimum contract requirements but

Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.

“U” Unacceptable Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.

140R3020Q0075 – Agricultural Water Savings Pilot Study and Consultation Attachment 4 – PPQ

Please circle the appropriate rating and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:

1. The relationship between the firm and client’s/customer’s contract team (specifically, the firm’s proficiency in developing positive, respectful, trusted, and productive relationships within the team):

O A S M U

2. The firm’s management and coordination of subcontractors/consultants (specifically, the firm’s ability to organize and facilitate a diverse group of people or parties to achieve consensus on complex and controversial topics):

O A S M U

3. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct:

O A S M U

4. Quality of work: O A S M U

5. Quality control: O A S M U

6. Ability to meet the performance schedule (specifically, the firm’s submission of past reports in accordance with the schedule to maintain the integrity of the performance end date):

O A S M U

7. Ability/actions to improve schedule problems, if applicable: O A S M U

8. Ability to control costs and provide the required work at a reasonable total price:

O A S M U

9. Compliance with labor standards, as applicable: O A S M U

10. Compliance with safety standards and/or number of safety related incidents, code compliance, as applicable:

O A S M U

11. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain:

Yes No

12. Would you award another contract to the firm being evaluated? If no, please explain:

Yes No

13. Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain: Yes No

14. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?

Yes No

15. Additional Remarks (supporting info or comments on any of the items above):

16. Overall rating for this firm: O A S M U

Print Name

Signature of Evaluator Date

The questionnaire should be submitted to the Bureau of Reclamation via e-mail directly to Ms. Jennalyn Schilke, Contract Specialist at jschilke@usbr.gov.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .