Att4_PPQ.pdf
PDF 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140R3020Q0075
About this file
This combined synopsis and solicitation is seeking quotes for agricultural water savings pilot study and consultation services. The Bureau of Reclamation requires a consultant to work collaboratively with stakeholders to explore current methods used to quantify certain agricultural water conservation activities in the Lower Colorado River Basin and recommend approaches to improve quantification methods. The work includes tasks such as developing a study plan and documentation processes. Quotes are due by August 31, 2020 for a requirement valued at a lump sum price. The NAICS code is 541620 and it is set aside for small businesses with a size standard of $16.5 million. The period of performance is September 18 through January 4, 2021 across various Lower Colorado River Basin locations. Evaluation criteria include relevant experience, knowledge, technical approach, past performance, and price.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Att2_PriceSchedule.pdf | ||
| Att1_ExhibitA_Reclamation Visual Identity Program.pdf | ||
| Att3_WD.pdf | ||
| 140R3020Q0075_CombinedSynopsisSolicitation_Formatted.pdf | ||
| Att1_PWS.pdf | ||
| Sol_140R3020Q0075.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
140R3020Q0075 – Agricultural Water Savings Pilot Study and Consultation Attachment 4 – PPQ
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
***NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS***
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Interior Region 8: Lower Colorado Basin, Bureau of Reclamation, Boulder City, NV, is considering the firm listed below. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance.
Past Performance Information:
Name and Address of Firm Being Evaluated:______________________________________
Contract No.:__________________ Type of Contract: _____________________ Project Title:___________________ Date of Award:_________________ Completion Date: _____________________ Location:______________________ Initial Amount:__________________ Final Amount: ________________________ Description:_________________________________________________________________
Evaluator: (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data.)
Name of Evaluator: ______________________________________
Company/Agency Name: ______________________________________
Address: ______________________________________
Phone Number: ______________________________________
Email Address: ______________________________________
Position Held or Function in Relation to Project: ______________________________________
Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the Additional Remarks section of this form.
“O” Outstanding Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements.
“A” Above Average Performance exceeded the contract requirements.
“S” Satisfactory Performance met the contract requirements.
“M” Marginal Performance met the minimum contract requirements but
Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
“U” Unacceptable Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.
140R3020Q0075 – Agricultural Water Savings Pilot Study and Consultation Attachment 4 – PPQ
Please circle the appropriate rating and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:
1. The relationship between the firm and client’s/customer’s contract team (specifically, the firm’s proficiency in developing positive, respectful, trusted, and productive relationships within the team):
O A S M U
2. The firm’s management and coordination of subcontractors/consultants (specifically, the firm’s ability to organize and facilitate a diverse group of people or parties to achieve consensus on complex and controversial topics):
O A S M U
3. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct:
O A S M U
4. Quality of work: O A S M U
5. Quality control: O A S M U
6. Ability to meet the performance schedule (specifically, the firm’s submission of past reports in accordance with the schedule to maintain the integrity of the performance end date):
O A S M U
7. Ability/actions to improve schedule problems, if applicable: O A S M U
8. Ability to control costs and provide the required work at a reasonable total price:
O A S M U
9. Compliance with labor standards, as applicable: O A S M U
10. Compliance with safety standards and/or number of safety related incidents, code compliance, as applicable:
O A S M U
11. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain:
Yes No
12. Would you award another contract to the firm being evaluated? If no, please explain:
Yes No
13. Was the customer satisfied with the end product? If no, please explain: Yes No
14. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
Yes No
15. Additional Remarks (supporting info or comments on any of the items above):
16. Overall rating for this firm: O A S M U
Print Name
Signature of Evaluator Date
The questionnaire should be submitted to the Bureau of Reclamation via e-mail directly to Ms. Jennalyn Schilke, Contract Specialist at jschilke@usbr.gov.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .