Atch 4 PPQ.pdf
PDF 171 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pairing Health Nutrition & Exercise (PHNX) Program Services: LCSW and CSCS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA561322Q0018
About this file
This federal contract opportunity solicitation requests quotes for Pairing Health Nutrition & Exercise (PHNX) Program Services at Ramstein Air Base in Germany. The services include a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist to increase preventative fitness capabilities for Airmen from 28 September 2022 through 27 September 2023. Quotes are due by 17:00 CEST on 15 August 2022 and shall be submitted electronically to the points of contact. The requirement is issued under NAICS code 621999 with FOB destination. The solicitation incorporates FAR provisions and clauses including 52.212-1, 52.212-2, 52.212-3, 52.212-4, and 52.212-5. Attachments provide the pricing schedule, performance work statements, applicable clauses and provisions, past performance questionnaire, and performance management plan.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch 6 Question and Answer document.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis-Solicitation 22Q0018 Amendement 1.pdf | ||
| Atch 3 Applicable Clauses and Provisions.pdf | ||
| Atch 2b PWS PHNX LCSW 28 June 22.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 Pricing Schedule.pdf | ||
| Atch 2a PWS PHNX CSCS 28 June 22.pdf | ||
| Combined Synopsis-Solicitation FA561322Q0018.pdf | ||
| Atch 5 PMP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4, PPQ
FA561322Q0018
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Pairing Health, Nutrition, and Exercise (PHNX) Program Services compromised of a team of medical providers & supporting agencies aimed to increase preventative fitness capabilities for Airmen assigned to Ramstein Air Base in Germany.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address:
Telephone Number: ____________________
Email Address: ____________________
Point of Contact: ____________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*: Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor: YES NO
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RATER INFORMATION:
Name of Rater: __________________________________________
Title: __________________________________________
Address: __________________________________________
Phone Number: __________________________________________
Email Address: __________________________________________
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM NOT LATER THAN 19 NOV 2021 TO:
Rebecca Berry/Contract Specialist Mr. Douglas Lindsey/Contracting Officer
700 CONS/PKA 700 CONS/PKA
rebecca.berry.1@us.af.mil douglas.lindsey@us.af.mil mailto:rebecca.berry.1@us.af.mil mailto:douglas.lindsey@us.af.mil
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E G S M U N Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E G S M U N
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at the place of performance.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and/or replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Provided adequately trained and certified personnel.
4. Interfaced and cooperated with government quality assurance personnel (or corporate/agency equivalent) after being awarded the contract and/or commencement of project performance.
5. Maintained sanitary conditions within the work environment.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies pursuant to their quality control procedures and established procedures to prevent recurrence of discrepancy.
8. Identified problems as they occurred and/or suggested alternative approaches to problem resolutions.
9. Displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved.
10. Provided timely and courteous service to patients.
11. Was responsive to contract changes (if applicable).
12. Provided adequate supervision and manpower to meet established schedules.
13. Contractor adequately coped with any sudden surge in requirements (if applicable).
14. Contractor adequately coped with short notice requirements.
15. How would you rate the vendor's overall performance?
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
| Contractors Name: |
| Telephone Number: |
| Email Address: |
| Address 1: |
| Address 2: |
| Address 3: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Project Title or Brief Description of Work: |
| Contract Number: |
| Contract Amount: |
| Contract Period or Dates of Performance: |
| Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor: Off |
| Name of Rater 1: |
| Name of Rater 2: |
| Address: |
| Phone Number: |
| Email Address_2: |
| CONTRACTORS NAME: |
| CONTRACT NUMBER: |
| 1: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 1: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 2: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 3: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 4: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 5: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 6: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 7: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 8: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 9: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 10: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 11: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 12: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 13: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 14: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 15: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 16: |
| REMARKSCOMMENTS 17: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .