Anger Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Anger Management Program Evaluation
- Solicitation number
- 15BNAS21Q00000037
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BRQ ANGER MANAGEMENT.pdf | ||
| SOW_Anger Management Revised.pdf | ||
| Business Quotation Anger Management.pdf | ||
| Anger Management Cover Letter.pdf | ||
| SOW_Anger Management new.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Psychology Services Branch Anger Management Research Project Evaluation Criteria
The quoter’s quotation will be evaluated in three areas: Technical, Past Performance, and Price.
Technical areas are more important than Past Performance, which in turn is more important than Price. Quoters should recognize that Price, although of lesser importance than Technical and Past Performance, might contribute substantially to the Source Selection Authority’s (SSA’s) contract award decision. As the evaluation of competing quotations in the Technical and Past Performance areas become more equal in rating, the more important Price will be come in selecting the best value for the Government. Technical and Past Performance areas will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), Evaluation of Quotations or Offers.
The quoter’s quotation must clearly demonstrate, at the time of submission, unless otherwise stated, the capability to meet the Decisional Rule criteria. Quotations will be rated based on the Decisional Rule criteria. Quotations shall clearly demonstrate the capability to meet all of the following Decisional Rule criteria:
1. The offeror demonstrates availability of a Project Manager with sufficient training, education, and experience to oversee project requirements outlined in this Statement of Work. Offeror must submit resume/curriculum vitae for senior staff.
2. The offeror demonstrates experience conducting outcome research on psychological programs. Offeror must submit documentation of outcome research (to include data collection and analysis) completed by personnel, including Project Manager.
3. The offeror demonstrates experience conducting research in a prison setting.
Offeror must submit documentation of prison research (to include data collection and analysis) completed by personnel, including Project Manager.
4. The offeror demonstrates experience conducting anger research.
Quoter must submit documentation of anger research (to include data collection and analysis) completed by personnel, including Project Manager.
5. The offeror demonstrates experience publishing research findings in peer-reviewed journals.
Offeror must submit documentation of published completed by personnel, including Project Manager.
PRICING
Prices quoted to the Government shall be as low as or lower than those charges to the supplier’s most favored customer for comparable quantities under similar terms and conditions, in addition to any discounts offered for prompt payment.
DELIVERIES
In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 16.505, and the clause located in FAR 52.216-18, Ordering, states that any supplies or services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by issuance of task orders by a warranted Contracting Officer in the National Acquisitions Section Contracting Office.
AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS
Quoters are advised an award may be made without discussions. The Contracting Officer cannot overemphasize the necessity for the initial quotation of a quoter to provide the Government with sufficient information identifying the quoter's best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .