Attachment_J-5.pdf
PDF 493 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- AG-82X9-S-17-0003
About this file
Attachment - J.5.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_000002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J-2.pdf | ||
| Amendment_000001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J-2.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J-1.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J-4.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J-2.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J-3.pdf | ||
| AG-82X9-S-17-0003.pdf | ||
| FBO_Synopsis_-_Bessey_Nursery.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions to Offeror for sending References Questionnaire Forms:
Prepare and send a reference questionnaire package for each project you list as a reference for the Past Performance evaluation factor. You are encouraged to send a questionnaire to other clients of contracts. For Government contracts, send to Contracting Officer or Technical Representative. For commercial references send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is your responsibility to follow-up and to encourage your references to send in their questionnaire.
If you have multiple references at one location, send one cover letter and questionnaire for each contract you want a reference for. Your questionnaire package should contain the following.
Cover Letter (See Example).
Respondent Information Rating Sheets.
Offeror should put name in spaces indicated and ensure it is on every page for identification purposes.
Suggested – Pre Addressed stamped envelope to return to the Contracting Officer.
Offeror should place their name on the top of each questionnaire page.
OFFEROR SHOULD DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE SENDING OUT
QUESTIONNAIRES.
Attachment J-5. AG-82X9-S-17-0003 Page 1 of 4
SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER
Your Company Letterhead
Date
To:
We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal under a project advertised by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Nebraska National Forest, Charles E. Bessey Nursery, 40637 River Loop, Halsey, Nebraska 69142. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm’s past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306(e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.
Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address to arrive NOT LATER THAN March 1, 2017. Do not return them to our company.
USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region, Acquisition Management Attn: Howard Redden, Contracting Officer 740 Simms Street Golden, Colorado 80401
If you have any questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact Howard Redden @ (303) 275-5288, or hredden@fs.fed.us . Thank you for your assistance.
Signature and Title
Attachment J-5. AG-82X9-S-17-0003 Page 2 of 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Contractor Name: 2. Contract Number:
3. Contractor Address: 4. Contract Type:
_______ Firm Fixed Price
_______ Cost Reimbursement
_______ Other (Please Specify)
5. Agency Name: 6. Agency POC/Phone/Fax:
7. Period of Performance: 8. Dollar Amount of Award:$
Total Dollar Value with Mods:
9. Title of Contract:
10. Description of Contract Service:
11. Complexity of Work: Difficult:___________ Routine: _____________
Note: Please use adjectival ratings from attached sheet.
12. Evaluation Factor 13. Comments (Att. additional sheets, if necessary) 14. Rating
a. Quality of Work
b. Personnel
c. Subcontractor Mgmt
d. Business Relations
e. Timeliness of Performance
f. Customer Satisfaction
g. Cost/Budget Control
13. Would you select this firm again? If no, please explain. (Att. Additional sheet if necessary.)
14. Name & Date: 15. Title:
Attachment J-5. AG-82X9-S-17-0003 Page 3 of 4
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES
Summarize Contractor Performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of Unsatisfactory, Poor, fair, Good, and Excellent. Use the following instructions as guidance in making these evaluations. Note:
There is no corresponding guidance for “Customer Satisfaction”. Please use the comments area on the preceding form to justify the rating given “Customer Satisfaction.”
Ratings Quality of
Work/Personnel/ Service
Cost Control Timeliness of Performance
Business Relations/Sub Contractor Mgmt
-Compliance w/contract requirements -Accuracy of reports -Appropriateness of personnel -Technical excellence
-Within budget -Current, accurate, complete billings -Relationship of negotiated costs to actual -Cost efficiencies -Change Orders issued
-Met interim milestones -Reliable -Responsive to technical direction -Completed on time
-Effective Mgmt -Businesslike correspondence -Responsive to contract requirements -Prompt notification of problems -Reasonable/ cooperative -Flexible -Pro-active -Effective SB/ SDB Subcontract Program
Unsatisfactory Quality problems are comprising the achievement of contract requirements
Cost issues are comprising performance
Delays are compromising achievement of contract requirements
Response is not effective
Poor Quality problems require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Cost issues require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Delays require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Response is marginally effective
Fair Quality problems require minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Cost issues require minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Delays require minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Response is somewhat effective
Good Quality problems do not impact achievement of contract requirements
Cost issues do not impact achievement of contract requirements
Delays do not impact achievement of contract requirements
Response is usually effective
Excellent There are no quality problems
There are no cost issues
There are no delays
Response is effective
Attachment J-5. AG-82X9-S-17-0003 Page 4 of 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .