ATT3_CHECKLIST_Tech_Edit_3-11-14.pdf
PDF 344 KB Posted
- Attached to
- IDIQ MULTI-AWARD TECHNICAL EDITOR FOR SRS HQ
- Solicitation number
- AG-4660-S-14-0005
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
Techical Editor Checklist
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ja_2013_saenz_(for_Tech_Edit).pdf | ||
| Questions_IDIQ_AG-4660-S-14-0005.docx | DOCX document | |
| GA-2010_Invasive_Plants_(for_Tech_Edit).docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT6_TECH_EVAL_INFO-rev3-20-14.doc | DOC document | |
| 1449_RFQ_FORM_2014.pdf | ||
| RFQ.doc | DOC document | |
| Optional_Quote_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT1_WD_05.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATT4_CHECKLIST_Styling_7-1-13.pdf | ||
| ATT5_EXP_QUEST.doc | DOC document | |
| ATT2_SOW_Tech_Editor-rev3-20-14.doc | DOC document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Technical Editor’s Checklist
Title, Author Affiliation, Abstract, Other
□ The manuscript’s title is appropriate in length and wording.
□ The manuscript includes job title, affiliation, and duty location (city and State) of all authors.
□ The abstract is concise (about 200 words); it adequately reports results and contains five to seven keywords.
□ Copyright and trademarks are included, where appropriate, and releases obtained.
□ All necessary information is included in the acknowledgments section for grant, cost-share, and cooperative agreements
(samples available on request).
□ If necessary, the need for pesticide and/or product disclaimers is identified.
General
□ Peer, biometrics, and potential-audience reviews are adequate.
□ The suggested publication series (i.e., GTR, RP, RB, RN, SU) is appropriate given the material presented in the manuscript.
□ Text is free of unanswered questions; no unresolved issues. Final edited version is read to ensure correctness.
□ Headings are clearly identified as #1, #2, #3, or #4 headings using the formatting suggested in the Authors Guide.
□ Results and conclusions follow from hypotheses/methods; assertions not supported by data are followed by lit citations.
□ Throughout the manuscript, the level of detail is consistent, length of sections is balanced, and headings and other organizational elements are consistent and marked appropriately to show ascendancy.
□ Superfluous material is eliminated or put into an appendix.
□ Language flows logically and is clear, understandable, and appropriate for the audience.
□ Text is free of sexist language, identifiable spelling errors, and errors in grammar, punctuation, and syntax.
□ Sentence lengths average 30 words or less; when practical, active voice replaces passive.
□ Items in a bulleted or numbered list are parallel and consistent.
□ Scientific names follow common names of species; the use or nonuse of authorities is consistent throughout.
□ Explanations of acronyms/abbreviations appear after first mention, listed in long manuscripts.
□ English and metric units are correct and consistent within the manuscript.
□ Verify that mathematical equations in electronic document appear the same as in original submitted hard copy.
□ All terms in math equations are adequately defined.
Literature Citations and References
□ All citations are complete (i.e., no missing information) as per our Authors Guide.
□ All citations in text are listed in Literature Cited and all citations have text references; when alphas are used to indicate same author(s)/year, the order of citations and text references is correct.
□ Author names and dates in text agree with Literature Cited section.
□ All Web references in text and in citations are verified.
□ All required information is included for personal communications, personal correspondences, and unpublished references
Tables, Figures, and Photos
□ Information in text agrees with tables and figures.
□ Figures and tables are accurate, uncluttered, and clearly needed to support hypotheses and conclusions;
□ Tables and figures are sequentially referenced and independent of text.
□ Table titles and figure captions accurately reflect the content of the tables and figures.
□ Abbreviations in tables and figures are written out in titles or footnotes.
□ Tables have logical row and column orientations and understandable labels; all cells contain information, with N/A and em dash explained in a note below the table; zero never means “no data.”
□ Every photo has a caption and a photo credit. Photos are not figures unless the author has enhanced them with symbols, numbers, or letters.
□ Based on the text, recommendations are made for additional tables, figures, and/or photos to help explain a concept or ease readability. The recommendation needs to complement the text (e.g., “I recommend before and after photos to show the results of the slash-and-burn technique described.”)
TECH EDITOR: I have completed the technical edit and checked the manuscript (and all applicable parts) for the above items.
(signature) (date)
GWI (if editing was done by a contractor): I have reviewed/checked the technical edits and approve the contractor’s work.
(signature) (date)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .