2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_14-0005.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Human Resource Technology Implementation and Advisory Services Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- AG-3187-S-14-0005
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1A_AG-3187-S-14-0005_Amendment_4_Page_34_of_the_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Questions_and_Answers_AG-3187-S-14-0005_18_Nov_2014.pdf | ||
| 1A_SF_1449_Amendment_3_to_the_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| 1A_AG-3187-S-14-0005_Amendment_2_Page_29__of_the_solicitation.pdf | ||
| 1A_AG-3187-S-14-0005_Amendment_1_Page_31_Solicitation_HRIT_Services.pdf | ||
| 3_Sample_Task_Order_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 1_AG-3187-S-14-0005_Solicitation_HRIT.pdf | ||
| Q A_for_Review_of_Draft_PWS_AG-3187-S-14-0005.docx | DOCX document | |
| Draft_TO_PWS_AG-3187-S-14-0005_04_Feb_2014.docx | DOCX document | |
| Draft_IDIQ_PWS_AG-3187-S-14-0005_04_Feb_2014.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
AG-3187-S-14-0005
Attachment 3
PAST / PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104
Please return this completed questionnaire by 19 Nov 2014 via email to Mr. Todd Mathie at tmathie@fs.fed.us.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
| A. |
| Contractor: |
| B. |
| Contract number: |
| C. |
| Contract type: |
| D. |
| Was this a competitive contract? |
| E. |
| Period of performance: |
| F. |
| Place of performance: |
| G. |
| Contract Value: |
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
| A. |
| Customer or Agency Name: |
| B. |
| Evaluator's Name: |
| C. |
| Evaluator's Title: |
| D. |
| Evaluator's Phone: |
| E. |
| Evaluator's E-mail: |
SECTION 3: EVALUATION RATINGS
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each performance category.
| E |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| The contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements. |
| VG |
| VERY GOOD |
| There are no, or very minimal issues and the contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| S |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Overall compliance requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| M |
| MARGINAL |
| Overall compliance requires significant agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| U |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of agency resources. Recovery will not be likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it will constitute a significant impediment in consideration for future awards for similar requirements. |
| N |
| NOT APPLICABLE |
| Unable to provide a score. |
SECTION 4: EVALUATION FACTORS
| 1. Ratings |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Quality of Service.
Effectiveness of Meeting Schedule.
Cost Control.
Business Relations.
Management of Key Personnel
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. Would you hire this contractor in the future to perform one of your critical and demanding projects? programs?
2. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
| _____________________________________ | _____________________ | |
| Evaluator’s Signature | Date |
Thank you for your assistance!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .