A-E Supplement B Submissions and Schedule.doc
DOC document 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C1DA--523A5-21-002 design Fuel Pump Replacements
- Solicitation number
- 36C24121R0210
About this file
This notice requests SF330 qualification packages from firms for Architect/Engineer design services to replace fuel pumps at the Brockton VA Medical Center in Massachusetts. Firms should provide design, specifications, cost estimates, and construction administration. Submissions are due August 30, 2021 and will be evaluated based on professional qualifications, reputation, experience with healthcare and fuel system projects, team qualifications, capacity, past performance, and location. The small business set-aside contract value is estimated between $100,000 and $250,000. Firms must be an SDVOSB and meet limitations on subcontracting. The selected firm will provide design reviews and submissions at 30%, 90%, 100% completion. The scope includes surveys, drawings, specifications, cost estimates, and as-built documents.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SDVOSB Compliance Statement.pdf | ||
| SOW Replace Fuel Pumps Brockton-523A5-21-002.docx | DOCX document | |
| PAST PERFROMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.docx | DOCX document | |
| A-E Supplement C Submissions.doc | DOC document | |
| West Roxbury Drawing Set 523A4-12-205.pdf | ||
| West Roxbury Specifications 523A4-12-205.pdf | ||
| 36C24121R0210.docx | DOCX document | |
| A-E Supplement A Scope and Site Visits.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Replace Fuel Pumps, Brockton
Project #523A5-21-002
SUPPLEMENT “B”
A/E SUBMISSIONS
OF DESIGN REVIEW MATERIAL
FIRST REVIEW
(Conceptual – Preliminary User Group Meetings & Field Surveys)
2 CDs each containing the following:
· AutoCAD and PDF conceptual/preliminary drawings
· Preliminary Investigation Report with Recommendations and Alternates
· Conceptual/preliminary estimates with proposed alternates 1 Set of full size conceptual/preliminary layout plans/details - 30 inches by 42 inches
1 Set of Preliminary Investigation Report with Recommendations and Alternates
SECOND REVIEW
(30% Submittal – Schematics)
2 CDs each containing the following:
· AutoCAD and PDF schematic drawings with phasing plans
· Set of design analysis, narrative report and phasing plans
· MS Word draft specifications in electronic format
· Schematic estimates with proposed alternates in electronic format
1 Set of full size bound schematic layout plans/details with phasing plans– 30 inches by 42 inches
1 Set of design analysis
1 Set of spiral bound draft specifications 1 Set of schematic estimates with proposed alternate
THIRD REVIEW
(90% Submittal – “CD” Construction Documents)
2 CDs each containing the following:
· AutoCAD and PDF construction drawings with phasing plans
· Set of design analysis, narrative report
· MS Word construction documents specifications
· Construction documents estimates
1 Set of full-size bound construction documents plans/details with phasing plans– 30 inches by 42 inches
1 Set of design analysis, narrative report 1 Set of spiral bound construction documents specifications
1 Set of MS Word construction documents specifications 1 Set of construction documents estimates
FOURTH REVIEW
(100% Submittal – Bid [Final] Documents)
2 CDs each containing the following:
· AutoCAD and PDF bid drawings
· MS Word/PDF final specification sections
· MS Word/PDF final specification sections merged
· Final estimates
· Final Phasing Schedule
1 Set of approved full-size bid documents with Registered Architect (RA) and Professional Engineer (PE) stamps - 30 inches by 42 inches
1 Set of 3-ring bound final specifications paginated front to back
1 Set of final estimates
1 Set of final phasing schedules
FIFTH REVIEW
(Project Close Out Submittal – “As-Built” Construction Documents)
2 CDs each containing the following:
· AutoCAD and PDF as-built drawings
1 Set of approved full size As-Built Mylar drawings with RA and PE stamp
| ID |
| Milestone Task Description |
| Duration |
| Schedule |
Date Actual
Date
| 1 |
| User Group Preliminary Mtg (Review Scope, Site Survey Investigation) |
| 1 Day |
| NTP + 1 |
| 2 |
| Preliminary Investigation of Existing Conditions |
| As Needed |
| 3 |
| Submit Conceptual Layout Schemes with Proposed Alternates |
| --- |
| 4 |
| User Group Mtg (Review Proposed Schemes) |
| 1 Day |
| NTP + 15 |
| 5 |
| Submit Revised Conceptual Layout Plans with Proposed Alternates |
| --- |
| 6 |
| User Group Mtg (Review Conceptual Plans) |
| 1 Day |
| NTP + 20 |
| 7 |
| Submit Revised Conceptual Layout Design for Approval |
| --- |
| 8 |
| User Group Mtg (Review/Approve Conceptual Plans) |
| 1 Day |
| NTP + 30 |
| 9 |
| Prepare 30% Schematic Design Submissions |
| --- |
| Survey Existing Conditions, Coordinate Design with Consultants & VA Comments |
| As Needed |
| 10 |
| Submit 30% Schematic Design Package |
| --- |
| VA Engineering 30% Review |
| 7 Days (Min) |
| 11 |
| User Group 30% Schematic Design Review Meeting |
| 1 Day |
| NTP + 60 |
| 12 |
| Prepare 90% “CD” Construction Document Submissions |
| --- |
| Coordinate Design with Consultants, Existing Conditions & VA Comments |
| As Needed |
| 13 |
| Submit 90% “CD” Construction Documents Package |
| --- |
| VA Engineering 90% Review |
| 14 Days (Min) |
| 14 |
| User Group 90% “CD” Review Meeting |
| 1 Day |
| NTP + 90 |
| 15 |
| Prepare 100% Bid Final Documents |
| --- |
| Finalize Coordination with Consultants, Existing Conditions & VA Comments |
| As Needed |
| 16 |
| Submit 100% Bid Final Documents with RA and PE Stamps |
| --- |
| NTP + 120 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .