83979 Att H - Reference Check Form.docx
DOCX document 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Therapy ServicesBid Documents State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 25-83979
- Issued by
- Indiana
About this file
This document is a Reference Check Form issued by the Indiana Department of Administration (IDOA) for RFP 25-83979 Therapy Services, with a reference submission due date of September 29, 2025. The form is designed for potential vendors to have their previous clients complete a comprehensive evaluation of their past performance, with instructions for submitting the reference check via email to idoareferences@idoa.in.gov.
The reference form contains 13 detailed questions that solicit feedback on various aspects of a vendor's performance, including service duration, stakeholder communication, financial audit issues, performance quality, staff capabilities, engagement effectiveness, resource allocation, cost management, and an overall vendor rating. Respondents are asked to provide ratings ranging from poor to superior for different performance dimensions, with opportunities to elaborate on their assessments and share additional comments that might inform the State of Indiana's vendor evaluation process.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Addendum 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP Boilerplate Documentv2.pdf | ||
| 83979 Att G - Q & A Template Response-.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 79415 Pre-Proposal Conference Slides.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| 83979 Att C - Indiana Economic Impact Form.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| RFP Boilerplate Documentv1.pdf | ||
| 83979 Att I - Pre-proposal Network Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att J - Attestation Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att K - Artificial Intelligence Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att L - Infrastructure Overview.docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att A - MWBE.docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att A1 - IVOSB.docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att B - Sample Contract.docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att D Cost Proposal (1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 83979 Att E - Business Proposal.docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att F Technical Proposal (1).docx | DOCX document | |
| 83979 Att G - Q&A Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment HState of Indiana Contact:
Christina Garcia, Strategic Sourcing Analyst CGarcia@idoa.IN.gov Indiana Department of Administration
Reference Check Form
RFP 25-83979
Therapy Services
Reference Check Form Due Date:
September 29, 2025
INSTRUCTIONS: You have been asked by the vendor listed below to provide a reference as they are responding the current solicitation with the state of Indiana. This is a standard form created by the State of Indiana and your input is very much appreciated. During this competitive process, a representative from the State of Indiana, may contact you directly for more detail. If you have any questions, please contact the State of Indiana contact listed in the box in the top left side of the form.
Please provide the information requested below and submit this reference check form to:
idoareferences@idoa.in.gov:
The subject line of the email submissions must clearly state the following:
RFP 25-83979 Reference – [INSERT COMPANY NAME]
VENDOR NAME
REFERENCE CONTACT INFORMATION
Reference Company Name
Contact Name
Contact Title
Company Mailing Address
Company City, State, Zip
Company Website Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Fax Number
Contact Email
Industry of Company
QUESTIONS: Please provide a response to each of the questions listed below regarding the vendor listed above.
1. If you decline to provide a reference, please indicate that below and provide any comments you would be willing to share regarding the reason.
2. How long did you/have you and/or members of your team worked with the vendor? Please provide the specific dates of service.
3. With what type of internal and external stakeholders did the vendor have to communicate with?
4. Has the vendor been cited for any financial audit issues? If you are able to, please describe the issue briefly, and any corrective actions required. Did the vendor ultimately address the issue(s) in a satisfactory manner?
5. Has the vendor been subject to any requests for corrective action to cure performance issues? If you are able to, please describe the issue briefly, and any corrective actions required. Did the vendor ultimately address the issue(s) in a satisfactory manner?
6. Would you rate your experience with the quality of services/work provided by vendor as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.
7. Would you rate the vendor's knowledge of your business as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.
8. Would you rate the overall quality of the vendor’s staff as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.
9. Would you describe the quality of the vendor’s engagement and communication with stakeholders (internal and external) throughout the project as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.
10. Would you rate the vendor’s ability to provide appropriate staff and resources for the project, as needed, at all times as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.
11. Would you rate the vendor's performance regarding cost and/or schedule overruns on the project as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.
12. Are there any other topics you believe Indiana should consider during its reference evaluation or comments you would like to share?
13. Would your overall rating of the vendor be poor, satisfactory, above average or superior?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .