80KSC021R0029 Section L Appendix 2 PPQs EES.docx

NASA/KSC SOLICITATION 80KSC021R0029

SECTION L - APPENDIX 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Emergency Egress System (EES) Conveyance Modifications at Kennedy Space Centers (KSC), FL

NASA Kennedy Space Center’s solicitation requires offerors to provide this Past Performance Questionnaire to customers to complete and return to NASA. Past performance raters are requested to submit the completed questionnaires to the contracting officer identified below via e-mail, to arrive not later than the proposal submission date.

Completed questionnaires should be sent to:

Mail Stop: OP-CS Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899

Raters are requested to complete the questionnaire forms as written since altered or substituted questionnaires may not adequately address the information NASA will be evaluating.

SECTION I. THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR

Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:

Name of Project and Contract/Order Number:

Period of Contract Performance (dates):

Place of Contract Performance:

Contract Value at Award:

Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount:

Contract Status (Prime or Subcontract?):

Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Office Phone Number/E-Mail Address:

THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RATER

(THIS QUESTIONNAIRE, WHEN COMPLETED, SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT)

Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:

Name of Project and Contract/Order Number:

Period of Contract Performance (dates) :

Place of Contract Performance:

Contract Value at Award:

Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount:

Contractor’s Status (Prime or Subcontractor?):

Percentage and Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Contractor:

Dates of Rater’s Involvement in Program/Contract:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Office Phone Number/E-Mail Address:

RATING DEFINITIONS:

On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being unsatisfactory and 5 being exceptional, please rate the contractor on the past performance areas included in this questionnaire. A rating of N/A should be used if the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown. Space is provided for any additional comments raters may want to provide. The definitions associated with the 1 to 5 ratings are provided below:

1. UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does (did) not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely (did not occur). The contractual performance contains (contained) serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective (were ineffective).

2. MARGINAL: Performance does (did) not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) serious problem(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions (did not provide acceptable corrective actions).

3. SATISFACTORY: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) some minor problems. Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective (Corrective actions taken were effective).

4. VERY GOOD: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements and exceeds (exceeded) some of the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective (Corrective actions taken were effective).

5. EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements and exceeds (exceeded) many of the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective (corrective actions taken were effective).

N/A: Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area.

CONTRACTOR’S TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS

1. The effectiveness of the Contractor’s overall project management ability (including but not limited to project managers, quality control managers, trade integrators, safety managers, and superintendents); labor (skilled and unskilled workers); equipment; supplies; tools; and financial resources to successfully perform, provide contract deliverables, and complete work in a safe and timely manner.

Comments:

2. The Contractor’s ability to provide timely and effective contractor management attention at the job site and partner with the owner to resolve technical and schedule issues affecting contract requirements.

Comments:

3. The Contractor’s ability to complete work within the required timeframe(s).

Comments:

4. The Contractor’s ability to provide quality engineering shop drawings and accurate and complete as-built documentation, and the verification process that ensured the entire project was complete including weld maps.

Comments:

5. The Contractor’s ability to safely and successfully install precision mechanical systems projects working at heights and maintain weld logs.

Comments:

6. The Contractor’s ability to install process control systems.

Comments:

7. The Contractor’s ability to test and commission hoisting equipment.

Comments:

CONTRACTOR’S SAFETY PERFORMANCE QUESTION

8. The Contractor’s ability to report and take corrective actions on safety accidents/incidents in a timely manner.

Comments:

CONTRACTOR’S CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS

9. The contractor’s ability to provide prompt payment of employees, subcontractors, and suppliers for services and supplies performed/delivered under the contract.

Comments:

10. The contractor’s compliance with Department of Labor requirements and resolution of reported violations/discrepancies.

Comments:

11. The contractor’s compliance with contract subcontracting plan goals for small disadvantaged business (SDB) concerns (see FAR 19.7), monetary targets for SDB participation (see FAR 19.1202), and notifications submitted under FAR 19.1202-4(b). (Applicable only to Large Business Offerors)

Comments:

12. The contractor’s ability to maintain acceptable Days Away Restricted or Transferred (DART) Rates, Total Case Rates (TCR), Days Away from Work Injury Illness (DAFWII), and Experience Modification Ratings (EMR) for the previous three years.

Comments:

13. Has the contractor’s performance required the issuance of any cure notices, show cause letters, or terminations for cause/default? (Please circle Yes or No)

Comments:

CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL CONTRACT PERFORMANCE

14. Would you select this contractor again? (Please circle Yes or No)

Comments:

THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.