Amendment 00001 (Signed).pdf

3/10/2023

80GSFC22R0029

Amendment 00001

1. The proposal due date has been extended from “2:00 PM EST on March 24, 2023” to “2:00 PM EST on March 29, 2023.”

2. Provision L.19 GSFC 52.215-201 (ALT I) PROPOSAL PREPARATION—GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS (ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL DELIVERY) (MAR 2020), paragraph (b)(1) is revised as follows: (1) to state the separate page count limit for Enclosure EE “COMMERCIAL ARCHITECTURE SECURITY QUESTIONAIRE” within the Technical Acceptability Standards Volume; and (2) to add the pricing and estimating techniques write-up under the Price Volume table. All other sections of this provision remain unchanged.

(changes are indicated by bold, italicized font).

FROM:

“(b) PROPOSAL CONTENT AND PAGE LIMITATIONS

(1) The following table contains the page limitations for each portion of the proposal submitted in response to this solicitation. Additional instructions for each component of the proposal are located in the solicitation provision noted under the Reference heading.

Proposal Component Volume Reference Page Limitations

Offer Volume I L.22 None Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Plan

Excluded

Technical Acceptability Standards Volume (1 Per Proposed Sub-Category (examples: at 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3))

II L.25 50 Pages per Proposed Sub- Category *

Cover Page, Indices, Table of Contents, DTE Capabilities Matrix, GEO to CisLunar Relay Requirements Compliance Matrix

Excluded

Price Volume III L.24 None Pricing Matrix Exhibit None IDIQ Fixed Price Rate Matrix (Operational Services)

None

Past Performance Volume IV L.26 Mixed

(a) Information from the Offeror 20 Pages

(b) Cover Page, Indices, Table of Contents, List of those sent Past Performance Questionnaires, Small Business Subcontracting Plan History, Customer Evaluations, Termination/Descope information, and List of Acronyms

Excluded

*A separate Technical Acceptability Standards Volume must be submitted for each SOW Sub- Category Proposed. NASA recognizes that some of the information may be repetitive for each Sub-Category volume.”

TO:

“(b) PROPOSAL CONTENT AND PAGE LIMITATIONS

(1) The following table contains the page limitations for each portion of the proposal submitted in response to this solicitation. Additional instructions for each component of the proposal are located in the solicitation provision noted under the Reference heading.

Proposal Component Volume Reference Page Limitations

Offer Volume I L.22 None Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Plan

Excluded

Technical Acceptability Standards Volume (1 Per Proposed Sub-Category (examples: at 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3))

II L.25 50 Pages per Proposed Sub- Category (excluding Enclosure EE-

CASQ)*

Enclosure EE-CASQ 30 Pages per Proposed Sub- Category

Cover Page, Indices, Table of Contents, DTE Capabilities Matrix, GEO to CisLunar Relay Requirements Compliance Matrix

Excluded

Price Volume III L.24 Mixed Pricing Matrix Exhibit None IDIQ Fixed Price Rate Matrix (Operational Services)

None

All pricing and estimating techniques utilized to price the IDIQ Fixed Price Rate Matrix (Operational Services)

Not to Exceed 2 pages

Past Performance Volume IV L.26 Mixed

(a) Information from the Offeror 20 Pages

(b) Cover Page, Indices, Table of Contents, List of those sent Past Performance Questionnaires, Small Business Subcontracting Plan History, Customer Evaluations, Termination/Descope information, and List of Acronyms

Excluded

* A separate Technical Acceptability Standards Volume must be submitted for each SOW Sub- Category Proposed. NASA recognizes that some of the information may be repetitive for each Sub-Category volume.”

3. Provision L.24 GSFC 52.215-225 PRICE VOLUME INSTRUCTIONS (JUL 2020), paragraph (a) is revised to update the wording in the last paragraph, and paragraph (b) is revised to clarify the instructions for completing Exhibit B and Attachment B. All other sections of this provision remain unchanged.

(changes are indicated by bold, italicized font).

FROM:

“(a) Instructions

Price Volume Exhibit B is included in this RFP and the required formats for other than certified cost or pricing data are for evaluation purposes. If the Offeror's estimating and/or accounting practice differs from the required Price Volume proposal format, the costs should be computed in accordance with the Offeror’s normal accounting and estimating procedures and provide your rationale for the format adjustments.

Final monetary extensions in the Price Volume proposal should be expressed as the closest whole dollar amount, with cents omitted.

Duty charges, if any, shall be included in the price, regardless of whether or not duty free certificates are obtained.

The Price Volume exhibit provided in the RFP are in Portable Document Format (PDF). Prior to completing the Price Volume exhibit, Offerors shall convert the .PDF file to Microsoft Office Excel either using Adobe Acrobat DC or manually recreate each individual exhibit. (Note:

Previous versions of Adobe Acrobat will not properly convert the PDF file to the Excel format.)

To convert the exhibits using Adobe Acrobat DC use the following steps:

Open the Price Volume exhibit .PDF file in Adobe Acrobat DC.

Click on the Export PDF tool in the right pane.

Choose spreadsheet as your export format, and then select Microsoft Excel Workbook.

Under the “Save As XLSX Settings” window, ensure that following selections are made:

Under Excel Workbook Settings ensure “Create Worksheet for each Page” is selected.

Under Numeric Settings ensure “Detect decimal and thousands separators using regional settings.”

Under Text Recognition Settings ensure “Recognize text if needed” is selected.

Ensure “English” is the selected language.

Click “OK” Click Export.

Name the Excel file and save it in a desired location.

All pricing and estimating techniques shall be clearly explained in detail (projections, rates, ratios, percentages, factors, etc.) and shall support the proposed pricing in such a manner that audit, computation, and verification can be accomplished. All past actuals shall show the periods of time and costs in detail when used as a basis for estimating the proposed pricing.

(b) Price Volume Proposal Format

(1) PRIME OFFEROR PRICE PER MINUTE AND CAPABILITY VALIDATION

REPRESENTATIVE TASK ORDER (RTO) FIRM FIXED PRICE

Offerors may propose on one or more of the subcategories listed in the statement of work. Prime offerors shall complete Exhibit B “Near Space Network Services Pricing Model.” This exhibit shall contain the Prime Offeror’s total firm fixed price for each proposed Capability Validation Representative Task Order (RTO) (corresponding to the applicable proposed subcategory) and the proposed Operational Services price per minute rate for each proposed subcategory by Contract Year. The proposed fully-loaded (loaded through profit, including any proposed subcontractor(s)) price per minute rates that are proposed in Exhibit B are “Not-To-Exceed" (NTE) bid rates for each Operational Services sub-category being proposed; these NTE bid rates must match the NTE bid rates in Attachment B, IDIQ FIXED PRICE RATES MATRIX (Operational Services). The Offeror shall clearly delineate the Offeror’s proposed nominal and critical fully-loaded rates.

The Offeror shall submit the completed Exhibit B with its proposal.

Upon award of this contract, NASA/GSFC intends to award the Capability Validation Representative Task Order consistent with the successful Offeror’s proposed task plan. An Offeror will not be considered for award, if the Offeror proposes an amount greater than the stated validation RTO Not-To-Exceed amount.

In compliance with the solicitation, the proposal will be rejected if the Offeror proposes a total Capability Validation firm fixed price that exceeds the RTO 2 Capability Validation Not-To-Exceed amount specified in Enclosure BB.2. Further, for RTO 2 the aggregate total of the subtask prices shall be equal to the Offeror’s proposed total Capability Validation firm fixed price.”

TO:

“(a) Instructions

Price Volume Exhibit B is included in this RFP and the required formats for other than certified cost or pricing data are for evaluation purposes. If the Offeror's estimating and/or accounting practice differs from the required Price Volume proposal format, the costs should be computed in accordance with the Offeror’s normal accounting and estimating procedures and provide your rationale for the format adjustments.

Final monetary extensions in the Price Volume proposal should be expressed as the closest whole dollar amount, with cents omitted.

Duty charges, if any, shall be included in the price, regardless of whether or not duty free certificates are obtained.

The Price Volume exhibit provided in the RFP are in Portable Document Format (PDF). Prior to completing the Price Volume exhibit, Offerors shall convert the .PDF file to Microsoft Office Excel either using Adobe Acrobat DC or manually recreate each individual exhibit. (Note:

Previous versions of Adobe Acrobat will not properly convert the PDF file to the Excel format.)

To convert the exhibits using Adobe Acrobat DC use the following steps:

Open the Price Volume exhibit .PDF file in Adobe Acrobat DC.

Click on the Export PDF tool in the right pane.

Choose spreadsheet as your export format, and then select Microsoft Excel Workbook.

Under the “Save As XLSX Settings” window, ensure that following selections are made:

Under Excel Workbook Settings ensure “Create Worksheet for each Page” is selected.

Under Numeric Settings ensure “Detect decimal and thousands separators using regional settings.”

Under Text Recognition Settings ensure “Recognize text if needed” is selected.

Ensure “English” is the selected language.

Click “OK” Click Export.

Name the Excel file and save it in a desired location.

All pricing and estimating techniques shall be clearly explained in detail (projections, rates, ratios, percentages, factors, etc.) and shall support the proposed pricing in such a manner that price analysis can be accomplished.

(b) Price Volume Proposal Format

(1) PRIME OFFEROR PRICE PER MINUTE AND CAPABILITY VALIDATION

REPRESENTATIVE TASK ORDER (RTO) FIRM FIXED PRICE

Offerors may propose on one or more of the subcategories listed in the statement of work. Prime offerors shall complete Exhibit B “Near Space Network Services Pricing Model.” This exhibit shall contain the Prime Offeror’s total firm fixed price for each proposed Capability Validation Representative Task Order (RTO) (corresponding to the applicable proposed subcategory) and the proposed Operational Services price per minute rate for each proposed subcategory by Contract Year (CY). The Offerors shall provide the operational services price per minute rates starting in the CY in which the proposed validation activities are anticipated to be completed.

The proposed fully-loaded (loaded through profit, including any proposed subcontractor(s)) price per minute rates that are proposed in Exhibit B are “Not-To-Exceed" (NTE) bid rates for each Operational Services sub-category being proposed; these NTE bid rates must match the NTE bid rates in Attachment B, IDIQ FIXED PRICE RATES MATRIX (Operational Services). The Offeror shall clearly delineate the Offeror’s proposed nominal and critical fully-loaded rates.

The Offeror shall submit the completed Exhibit B with its proposal.

Upon award of this contract, NASA/GSFC intends to award the Capability Validation Representative Task Order consistent with the successful Offeror’s proposed task plan. An Offeror will not be considered for award, if the Offeror proposes an amount greater than the stated validation RTO Not-To-Exceed amount.

In compliance with the solicitation, the proposal will be rejected if the Offeror proposes a total Capability Validation firm fixed price that exceeds the RTO 2 Capability Validation Not-To-Exceed amount specified in Enclosure BB.2. Further, for RTO 2 the aggregate total of the subtask prices shall be equal to the Offeror’s proposed total Capability Validation firm fixed price.”

4. Provision L.26 GSFC 52.215-230 Past Performance Volume (MAR 2020) is replaced with the following revised provision to delete any references to providing classified past performance information.

FROM:

“L.26 GSFC 52.215-230 Past Performance Volume (MAR 2020)

An Offeror’s past performance record indicates the relevant quantitative and qualitative aspects of performing services or delivering products similar in size and content to the requirements of this acquisition.

The Offeror shall provide, at a minimum, the following information in support of its proposal to facilitate the evaluation of the Offeror’s past performance as related to the requirements of the proposed contract.

(a) INFORMATION FROM THE OFFEROR

Prime Offerors shall furnish the information requested below for all of your most recent contracts (completed and ongoing) for similar efforts with a minimum average annual cost/fee incurred of $1,000,000 for Category 1 and $3,000,000 for Category 2 that your company has had within the last 10 years of the RFP release date.

If a prime Offeror is submitting past performance data on a current/past contract vehicle that includes multiple tasks, orders, etc, all effort under that contract vehicle may be consolidated for the purposes of meeting the average annual cost/fee incurred in the instructions above and for the purpose of evaluating contract relevance for the proposed requirement.

If applicable, Offerors may provide the experience or past performance of a parent or affiliated or predecessor company to an Offeror (including Joint Venture prime partner companies and/or a parent or affiliated company that is being otherwise proposed as a subcontractor on this effort) where the firm’s proposal demonstrates that the resources of the parent or affiliate or predecessor will affect the performance of the Offeror. The Offeror shall demonstrate that the resources of the parent or affiliate or predecessor company (its workforce, management, facilities or other resources) shall be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the parent or affiliate or predecessor will have meaningful involvement in contract performance.

If applicable, small businesses Offerors that are proposing as the prime contractor can provide past performance information for their first-tier small business subcontractor(s) if the capabilities, past performance, and experience of the small business prime does not independently demonstrate capabilities and past performance necessary for award. Such references must meet a minimum average annual cost/fee incurred of $250,000 for Category 1 and $1,000,000 for Category 2 that the first tier small business subcontractor has had within the last 10 years of the RFP release date.

Past performance information classified at the Collateral Confidential and/or Secret Level shall be: (1) submitted by the proposal due date; (2) segregated from the unclassified information and packaged separately in accordance with mailing procedures for classified documentation; and (3) referenced in the unclassified documentation. Evaluators desiring to submit past performance information at the Top Secret or Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) levels shall notify the Contracting Officer who will make arrangements for transmission.

The Offeror shall provide the following information on all past/current contract references that meet the above criteria for the Prime Offeror, and for first-tier small businesses subcontractors if applicable to a small business Prime Offeror:

Customer's name, E-mail address, and telephone number of both the lead contractual and technical personnel most familiar with the Offeror’s performance record. (Please verify the information provided is current and correct).

Cage Code and/or DUNS Number of the contractor performing the work.

Contract number, type, and total original and present or final contract value.

The current contract expenditures incurred to date, the date in which the expenditures have been incurred through, and the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date. For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):

A current five year contract that you are performing has a total estimated value of $100,000,000.

As of the latest cost report which reflected cost/fee through the first 2 years and 4 months of performance, the total amount of cost/fee incurred by the Offeror over the duration of the contract was $43,500,000.

In this example, an Offeror would provide the following:

Current Contract Expenditures incurred to Date: $43,500,000

Date in which Expenditures have been incurred through: Insert Date of cost report that indicated cost/fee total of $43,500,000 after 2 years and 4 months of performance.

Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)

Date of contract, place(s) of performance, and delivery dates or period of performance.

Brief description of contract work and comparability to the proposed effort. It is not sufficient to state that it is comparable in magnitude and scope. Rationale must be provided to demonstrate that it is comparable.

Method of acquisition: competitive or noncompetitive.

Nature of award: initial or follow-on. If initial, indicate whether award was preceded by a Government, customer, or Offeror financed study.

Identify and explain major technical problems and how they were overcome. List any major deviations or waivers to technical requirements that were granted by the customer.

Identify and explain completion successes and delays, including adherence to program schedules. Provide an assessment of the performance (technical and schedule) on these past programs and support these assessments with metrics such as award or incentive fees earned.

Cost management history; identify and explain any cost overruns and underruns, and cost incentive history, if applicable.

Average number of personnel on the contract per year and percent turnover of personnel per year.

Recent customer evaluations of past performance including Award Fee Evaluation results, Fee Determination Official letters, Annual Performance Evaluation Forms, etc. (Excluded from the page limitation).

Small Business Subcontracting Plan history; provide latest Individual Subcontract Report (ISR) and Summary Subcontract Report (SSR) (formerly known as the SF 294 and 295 reports) and supporting rationale (Excluded from the page limitation).

List any contracts terminated (partial or complete) within the past 10 years and basis for termination (convenience or default). Include the contract number, name, address, and telephone number of the terminating officer (please verify telephone numbers). Include contracts that were "descoped" by the customer because of performance or cost problems. (Excluded from the page limitation).

(b) PRIOR CUSTOMER EVALUATIONS (PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES)

The offeror shall provide the questionnaires provided as Exhibit A.1 (Category 1-DTE) and/or A.2 (Category 2-Relay) to each of the above references to establish a record of past performance.

The Offeror shall instruct each of its references to return the questionnaire directly to the Government Contracting Officer via email. The questionnaire respondent shall be a representative from the technical customer and responsible Contracting Officer with direct knowledge of your firm's performance. If possible, the Offeror shall provide questionnaires to customers from NASA contracts, other Government contracts, and commercial contracts.

The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that the questionnaire is completed and submitted, via email to Sang.H.Lee@nasa.gov no later than the closing date of this solicitation designated in Block 9 of the SF 33.

The Offeror shall include a list of those to whom the questionnaires were sent, including name of individual, phone number, organization, and contract number.

(End of provision)”

TO:

“L.26 GSFC 52.215-230 Past Performance Volume (MAR 2020)

An Offeror’s past performance record indicates the relevant quantitative and qualitative aspects of performing services or delivering products similar in size and content to the requirements of this acquisition.

The Offeror shall provide, at a minimum, the following information in support of its proposal to facilitate the evaluation of the Offeror’s past performance as related to the requirements of the proposed contract.

(a) INFORMATION FROM THE OFFEROR

Prime Offerors shall furnish the information requested below for all of your most recent contracts (completed and ongoing) for similar efforts with a minimum average annual cost/fee incurred of $1,000,000 for Category 1 and $3,000,000 for Category 2 that your company has had within the last 10 years of the RFP release date.

If a prime Offeror is submitting past performance data on a current/past contract vehicle that includes multiple tasks, orders, etc, all effort under that contract vehicle may be consolidated for the purposes of meeting the average annual cost/fee incurred in the instructions above and for the purpose of evaluating contract relevance for the proposed requirement.

If applicable, Offerors may provide the experience or past performance of a parent or affiliated or predecessor company to an Offeror (including Joint Venture prime partner companies and/or a parent or affiliated company that is being otherwise proposed as a subcontractor on this effort) where the firm’s proposal demonstrates that the resources of the parent or affiliate or predecessor will affect the performance of the Offeror. The Offeror shall demonstrate that the resources of the parent or affiliate or predecessor company (its workforce, management, facilities or other resources) shall be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the parent or affiliate or predecessor will have meaningful involvement in contract performance.

If applicable, small businesses Offerors that are proposing as the prime contractor can provide past performance information for their first-tier small business subcontractor(s) if the capabilities, past performance, and experience of the small business prime does not independently demonstrate capabilities and past performance necessary for award. Such references must meet a minimum average annual cost/fee incurred of $250,000 for Category 1 and $1,000,000 for Category 2 that the first tier small business subcontractor has had within the last 10 years of the RFP release date.

The Offeror shall provide the following information on all past/current contract references that meet the above criteria for the Prime Offeror, and for first-tier small businesses subcontractors if applicable to a small business Prime Offeror:

Customer's name, E-mail address, and telephone number of both the lead contractual and technical personnel most familiar with the Offeror’s performance record. (Please verify the information provided is current and correct).

Cage Code and/or DUNS Number of the contractor performing the work.

Contract number, type, and total original and present or final contract value.

The current contract expenditures incurred to date, the date in which the expenditures have been incurred through, and the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date. For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):

A current five year contract that you are performing has a total estimated value of $100,000,000.

As of the latest cost report which reflected cost/fee through the first 2 years and 4 months of performance, the total amount of cost/fee incurred by the Offeror over the duration of the contract was $43,500,000.

In this example, an Offeror would provide the following:

Current Contract Expenditures incurred to Date: $43,500,000

Date in which Expenditures have been incurred through: Insert Date of cost report that indicated cost/fee total of $43,500,000 after 2 years and 4 months of performance.

Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)

Date of contract, place(s) of performance, and delivery dates or period of performance.

Brief description of contract work and comparability to the proposed effort. It is not sufficient to state that it is comparable in magnitude and scope. Rationale must be provided to demonstrate that it is comparable.

Method of acquisition: competitive or noncompetitive.

Nature of award: initial or follow-on. If initial, indicate whether award was preceded by a Government, customer, or Offeror financed study.

Identify and explain major technical problems and how they were overcome. List any major deviations or waivers to technical requirements that were granted by the customer.

Identify and explain completion successes and delays, including adherence to program schedules. Provide an assessment of the performance (technical and schedule) on these past programs and support these assessments with metrics such as award or incentive fees earned.

Cost management history; identify and explain any cost overruns and underruns, and cost incentive history, if applicable.

Average number of personnel on the contract per year and percent turnover of personnel per year.

Recent customer evaluations of past performance including Award Fee Evaluation results, Fee Determination Official letters, Annual Performance Evaluation Forms, etc. (Excluded from the page limitation).

Small Business Subcontracting Plan history; provide latest Individual Subcontract Report (ISR) and Summary Subcontract Report (SSR) (formerly known as the SF 294 and 295 reports) and supporting rationale (Excluded from the page limitation).

List any contracts terminated (partial or complete) within the past 10 years and basis for termination (convenience or default). Include the contract number, name, address, and telephone number of the terminating officer (please verify telephone numbers). Include contracts that were "descoped" by the customer because of performance or cost problems. (Excluded from the page limitation).

(b) PRIOR CUSTOMER EVALUATIONS (PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES)

The offeror shall provide the questionnaires provided as Exhibit A.1 (Category 1-DTE) and/or A.2 (Category 2-Relay) to each of the above references to establish a record of past performance.

The Offeror shall instruct each of its references to return the questionnaire directly to the Government Contracting Officer via email. The questionnaire respondent shall be a representative from the technical customer and responsible Contracting Officer with direct knowledge of your firm's performance. If possible, the Offeror shall provide questionnaires to customers from NASA contracts, other Government contracts, and commercial contracts.

The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that the questionnaire is completed and submitted, via email to Sang.H.Lee@nasa.gov no later than the closing date of this solicitation designated in Block 9 of the SF 33.

The Offeror shall include a list of those to whom the questionnaires were sent, including name of individual, phone number, organization, and contract number.

5. Provision M.5 GSFC 52.215-325 PRICE EVALUATION FACTOR (NOV 2016), the third paragraph is revised to clarify what pricing information will be presented to the Selecting Official. All other sections of this provision remain unchanged.

(changes are indicated by bold, italicized font).

FROM:

“M.5 GSFC 52.215-325 PRICE EVALUATION FACTOR (NOV 2016)

A price analysis will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(1). Price analysis is described at FAR 15.404-1(b). This analysis is done to ensure that a "fair and reasonable" price is paid by the Government. However, the analysis is not intended to be protective of the offeror.

Each proposed Representative Task Order (RTO) pricing contained in Enclosure BB, along with the pricing contained in Exhibit B “Near Space Network Services Pricing Model,” will be assessed to determine the reasonableness of the proposed subcategory validation price, along with the Not-To-Exceed (NTE) Operational Services price per minute rates.

The total proposed price for each RTO subcategory will be presented to the Selecting Official.

The NTE Operational Services price per minute rates proposed in Exhibit B shall also be provided in Attachment B “IDIQ Fixed Price Rate Matrix (Operational Services).” Attachment B will be incorporated into any resultant contract.

TO:

“M.5 GSFC 52.215-325 PRICE EVALUATION FACTOR (NOV 2016)

A price analysis will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(1). Price analysis is described at FAR 15.404-1(b). This analysis is done to ensure that a "fair and reasonable" price is paid by the Government. However, the analysis is not intended to be protective of the offeror.

Each proposed Representative Task Order (RTO) pricing contained in Enclosure BB, along with the pricing contained in Exhibit B “Near Space Network Services Pricing Model,” will be assessed to determine the reasonableness of the proposed subcategory validation price, along with the Not-To-Exceed (NTE) Operational Services price per minute rates.

The total evaluated price for each subcategory, including the Total Price for Operational Services Minutes for Contract Years 1-10 and the proposed Not-to-Exceed Capability Validation Total Price proposed by the offeror will be presented to the Selecting Official, as well as the results of the price analysis of the Offeror’s proposal.

The NTE Operational Services price per minute rates proposed in Exhibit B shall also be provided in Attachment B “IDIQ Fixed Price Rate Matrix (Operational Services).” Attachment B will be incorporated into any resultant contract.

6. Exhibit B “Near Space Network Services Pricing Model” has been revised to clarify how the price calculations will be performed within this Exhibit. The revised Exhibit B is attached to this amendment.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

--END OF AMENDMENT 00001--