Amendment_01_to_80GSFC18R0045.pdf
PDF 247 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) Star Sensor System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80GSFC18R0045
About this file
Amendment 01
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions_and_Responses_Set_1.pdf | ||
| PACE_STS_Solicitation_Final.pdf | ||
| PACE-GNC-SOW-0064A_06-05-2018.pdf | ||
| STS_RFP_letter.pdf | ||
| PACE_STS_SpecComplianceMatrix-2018-06-15.pdf | ||
| SF26.pdf | ||
| Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-Star_Sensor_System.pdf | ||
| PACE-GNC-SPEC-0064B_06-18-2018.pdf | ||
| PACE_ST_DRAFT_SPEC_4-12-18).pdf | ||
| PACE-GNC-_DRAFT_SOW-0034-4-12-18.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
80GSFC18R0045
Amendment 1
1. Section A of Clause M.3 PROPOSAL EVALUATION is revised as follows:
FROM:
The Offeror’s response to the provision L.11.A “Technical Acceptability” will be rated as either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable.”
(1) To be determined “Acceptable, the Offeror must demonstrate compliance with at least
70% of the requirements defined in Attachment B, as calculated using the
Compliance Matrix.
(2) The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed detailed technical specifications and heritage performance data to ensure consistency and compliance with the Offeror’s completed Compliance Matrix (Enclosure L.2). For purposes of making compliance calculations, a “section” is any specification that has been specifically enumerated and separately listed in the compliance matrix, no matter how many levels the specification number contains.
(3) Overall, Proposals will be rated as “Acceptable” if rated “Acceptable” under A.1 and
A.2, above. The Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Unacceptable” if the proposal fails to earn an “Acceptable” rating under A.1 and A.2 above.
(4) As noted above, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contract(s) without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR
15.306(a)). If discussions are held, proposal revisions may be requested of initial proposals that are “Unacceptable” and may result in a revised proposal rating of
“Acceptable”. Award will only be made to an Offeror with an “Acceptable” rating.
TO:
The Offeror’s response to the provision L.11.A “Technical Acceptability” will be rated as either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable.”
(1) To be determined “Acceptable, the Offeror must demonstrate compliance with at least
70% of the requirements defined in Attachment B, as calculated using the
Compliance Matrix.
(2) The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed detailed technical specifications and heritage performance data to ensure consistency and compliance with the Offeror’s completed Compliance Matrix (Enclosure L.2). For purposes of making compliance calculations, a “section” is any specification that has been specifically enumerated and separately listed in the compliance matrix, no matter how many levels the specification number contains.
80GSFC18R0045
Amendment 1
(3) Overall, Proposals will be rated as “Acceptable” if rated “Acceptable” under A.1 and
A.2, above. The Offeror’s proposal will be rated “Unacceptable” if the proposal fails to earn an “Acceptable” rating under A.1 or A.2 above.
(4) As noted above, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contract(s) without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR
15.306(a)). If discussions are held, proposal revisions may be requested of initial proposals that are “Unacceptable” and may result in a revised proposal rating of
“Acceptable”. Award will only be made to an Offeror with an “Acceptable” rating.
-END OF AMENDMENT 01-
File details come from the government source that posted it.