DFC Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 362 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Country Risk/Country Industry Reports
- Solicitation number
- 77344421Q0011
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on the International Development Finance Corporation solicitation number 77344421Q0011. The solicitation requires commercial off-the-shelf web-based information systems providing access to country reports on political and economic risks, and country-industry reports on issues and risks associated with key industries in specific countries. The questionnaire asks the reference to rate the contractor's performance on a previous contract in areas such as requirements fulfillment, schedule adherence, and pricing. Ratings include exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal and unsatisfactory. The completed questionnaire must be returned to the contracting officer by January 15, 2021.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Country Risk - Sector Report Requirements RFQ.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DFC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to the Contracting Professional listed below.
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the International Development Finance Corporation, Solicitation Number 77344421Q0011. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contract Specialist, e-mail jason.jamula@DFC.gov.
Questionnaire is due no later than 4:00 PM Eastern Standard Time on 15 January 2021.
Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist on company letterhead if faxed or emailed from a corporate email account.
If you will not be available for verification of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contacting officer to contact.
Alternate POC name:
Alternate POC phone number: _
Alternate POC e-mail address:
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number:
2. Contract Value:
3. Period of Performance:__________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided:_________________________________________
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:________________________________________________________
Title: Phone:
mailto:jason.jamula@opic.gov.
mailto:jason.jamula@opic.gov.
E-mail:
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions -
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor's corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor's corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor's ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good 1 Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory NIA
Performance
Comments, if any.
Question 2. Overall Rating of Contractor's performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor's performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Questions: |
| Questions: |
| Due Date: |
| Due Date: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Place of Performance: |
| Place of Performance: |
| Quote Instructions: |
| Quote Instructions: |
| Evaluation Factors for Award |
| Evaluation Factors for Award |
| Basis for Award |
| Basis for Award |
| Award will be based on the following criteria: |
| Award will be based on the following criteria: |
| • Past performance evaluations must meet the following criteria mix. Note - a single institution/library can meet more than one criterion: |
| • Past performance evaluations must meet the following criteria mix. Note - a single institution/library can meet more than one criterion: |
| Alternate POC phone number: |
| 1 Contract or Identifying Number: |
| 3 Period of Performance: |
| 4 Brief description of items provided: |
| 5 Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: |
| AgencyCompany: |
| Alternate POC name: |
| Alternate POC email: |
| phone: |
| fax: |
| email: |
| Contract Value: |
| Title: |
| Phone: |
| Email: |
| Exceptional: Off |
| Check Box11: Off |
| Check Box12: Off |
| Check Box13: Off |
| Check Box14: Off |
| Check Box15: Off |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Check Box18: Off |
| Check Box19: Off |
| Check Box20: Off |
| General Comments: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .