Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Evaluation.doc

70CMSW18R00000005

Attachment 3

CONTRACTOR-PROVIDED LETTER

REQUESTING PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

70CMSW18R00000005

DATE:

Company Name/Address

FAX:

PHONE:

SUBJECT:

Past Performance of

Contract No.

Mr./Ms.:

Our company recently completed or is currently engaged under the above contract, which we provided ammunition for your Agency. The requirements of this contract were similar to the requirements of a solicitation for which we have submitted a proposal to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

As part of the proposal evaluation, I ask that you evaluate our performance under the subject contract by completing the attached questionnaire form and emailing directly to the Contract Specialist, Muharrem Sayan at Muharrem.Sayan@ice.dhs.gov no later than Tuesday, August 21, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST), and CC Ian.Somppi@ice.dhs.gov. Please provide rationale for the assigned ratings, particularly the ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory. The completed form will be marked and treated as “Source Selection Information” in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation 3.104, Procurement Integrity, and it will not be released except to Government personnel needing the information for source selection purposes or to your Agency for comments during the source selection process.

Your cooperation and expeditious attention in this matter is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely

Title:

Company:

Name of Proposed Contractor: ____________________

Contract No.:

Name of Rater: _______________________

Phone No.: ________________

Contract Type: _______________________

Place of Performance: ________________

Performance Period: __________________

Contract Dollar Amount:

1. Adjectival Definitions:

Neutral - No past performance available for evaluation. The offeror has asserted that is has no directly related or similar relevant past performance experience. The offeror receives no merit for this factor.

Outstanding – Based on the offeror’s record of past performance, no issues, concerns, or risks are associated with receiving acceptable ammunition in a timely manner. Past performance surveys and offeror’s experiences indicate that the offeror is capable of meeting the delivery requirements.

Acceptable – Based on the offeror’s record of past performance, few issues, concerns, or risks are associated with receiving acceptable ammunition in a timely manner. Past performance surveys and offeror’s experiences indicate that the offeror is capable of meeting the delivery requirements.

Unacceptable – The offeror’s record of past performance indicates it will be unable to deliver acceptable ammunition in a timely manner.

Please circle each of the areas below of the contractor’s past performance based on the comments provided by the customer.

2. Customer Satisfaction Commitment: To what degree was the Contractor considered responsive to and cooperative with customer personnel?

Narrative Summary:

3. Quality of Service: This area of the questionnaire deals with compliance of contract requirements, to include appropriateness of personnel and technical excellence.

3.a Overall compliance with contract terms and conditions:

3.b Effectiveness and reliability of Contractor’s Key Personnel.

3.c Adequacy of maintaining and controlling Government equipment.

4. Timeliness of Performance: This is the area that deals with the contractor’s ability to meet milestones and delivery schedule, to include responsiveness to technical direction, completion of efforts on time including wrap-up and contract administration.

4.a Overall performance in planning, schedule, and monitoring.

4.b Completion of major milestones on schedule:

4.c Responsiveness to contract changes from a contract administration perspective.

4.d Responsiveness to changes in technical direction.

4.e Timely completion of efforts within period of performance.

4.f Responsiveness/capability to respond to urgent/short term requirements.

4.g Efficiency in meeting cost targets without experiencing overruns.

4.h Ability to control costs through the use of evolving technology mixed with Commercial Off-The-Shelf technologies.

4.i Effectively assess impacts of changes on other associated projects, task and efforts.

4.j Appropriately choose effective subcontractors and teaming partners and maintain good business relationships.

4.k Ability to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Government personnel.

4.l Effectiveness in interfacing with Government personnel.

4.m Has the Contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, or other letters directing the correction of a performance problem?

Yes_________

No____________

If yes, please explain:

4.n Changes in contract dollars value throughout the life of the contract are/were attributable, for the most part, to:

( ) Government-issued change orders

( ) claims submitted by the Contractor

( ) other Government actions

( ) other contractor actions.

Please explain:

4.o Based on this Contractor’s overall performance, would you award this Contractor another Government contract?

Yes________

No___________

If no, please explain:

5. Overall rating for this offeror: