NEPA_CE.pdf

NP-GRSM 15(1) Page 1 of 5

Categorical Exclusion Form Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Blount County, Tennessee

Project Number: NP-GRSM 15(1) Date: March 4, 2019 Project Name: Repair Bote Mountain Tunnel

Project Description:

The National Park Service (NPS), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), proposes to complete preventative maintenance on Bote Mountain Tunnel along Laurel Creek Road in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The Bote Mountain Tunnel is a 121-foot concrete-lined tunnel located along Laurel Creek Road approximately 1.1 miles from The Townsend Wye heading west towards the Cades Cove district of the Park. The latest inspection report, dated 2017, rates this structure in poor condition overall. Several of the concrete seams have deteriorated and leak water onto the traveled route below.

The project length is 0.11 miles (600 feet). Project work includes repair to the concrete lining, replacing the tunnel drainage system, removing loose stones above portals, cleaning drainage inlets and culverts, asphalt concrete pavement milling and overlay, permanent pavement markings, and other miscellaneous work. These repairs on the tunnel prevent more serious problems that could pose safety hazards and more costly repairs in the future.

Soil disturbing activities include ditch reconditioning, shoulder reconditioning, and paved waterway construction. No new impervious surfaces will be created by this project work. The total disturbed area for the project is approximately 0.04 acres.

Mitigation Measures:

For the proposed project actions to be within compliance requirements during construction and/or project implementation, the following mitigations must be adhered to:

- A public information program to warn of temporary closures, delays, and road hazards during construction shall be implemented. This program would help convey appropriate messages to the public and aid in mitigating potential impacts on visitors' expectations and experiences. Schedule repair work to minimize visitor impacts to the extent possible.

- All storm sewer inlets that are in or near or made operable during construction projects shall be protected so that sediment-laden water cannot enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment or construction materials such as grout or cement.

- In the event of the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources, work will halt and the archeologist will be contacted. Work will not resume until archeologist gives approval to resume. If ground disturbing work outside of previously disturbed areas becomes

NP-GRSM 15(1) Page 2 of 5 necessary, cultural resource staff is to be contacted prior to the start of this work.

- Cultural resource staff is to be contacted if scope changes occur as project is further defined through the development of construction/contract documents to confirm the project conforms to streamlined activities.

- In accordance with the March 4, 2019 U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) not likely to adversely affect (NLAA) Concurrence Verification Letter, the following avoidance and minimization measures (AMMs) were accepted and must be implemented:

o Ensure all operators, employees, and contractors working in areas of known or presumed bat habitat are aware of all FHWA/FRA/FTA (Transportation Agencies) environmental commitments, including all applicable AMMs.

o If structure maintenance, repair, and/or alteration will be performed during the winter hibernation period, determine if work will occur in an area with hibernating bats. If hibernating bats or signs of frequent bat activity are observed, Transportation Agencies and State DOTs will conduct maintenance activity or similar structure alteration in a manner that will not disturb bats using the structure.

o If bat activity (or signs of frequent bat activity) is observed, Transportation Agencies and State DOTs will not remove the structure.

- In the event of the discovery of bat(s), work will halt and the CO and Park biologist will be contacted. Work will not resume until the CO and/or Park biologist gives approval to resume. If work outside of the previously defined areas becomes necessary, the CO is to be contacted prior to the start of this work.

Category Used to Exclude the Action from Further NEPA Analysis:

23 CFR § 771.117(c)(22) Projects, as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101, that would take place entirely within the existing operational right-of-way. Existing operational right-of-way refers to right-of-way that has been disturbed for an existing transportation facility or is maintained for a transportation purpose. This area includes the features associated with the physical footprint of the transportation facility (including the roadway, bridges, interchanges, culverts, drainage, fixed guideways, mitigation areas, etc.) and other areas maintained for transportation purposes such as clear zone, traffic control signage, landscaping, any rest areas with direct access to a controlled access highway, areas maintained for safety and security of a transportation facility, parking facilities with direct access to an existing transportation facility, transit power substations, transit venting structures, and transit maintenance facilities. Portions of the right-of-way that have not been disturbed or that are not maintained for transportation purposes are not in the existing operational right-of-way.

The National Park Service made the assessment of no adverse and effect and categorically excluded the project from further analysis, as documented in the Letter of Compliance Completion dated October 24, 2018, under the categorical exclusion DOI 516 Departmental Manual (DM) 12.5(C)(4) Routine maintenance and repairs to cultural resource sites, structures, NP-GRSM 15(1) Page 3 of 5 utilities and grounds under an approved Historic Structures Preservation Guide or Cyclic Maintenance Guide; or if the action would not adversely affect the cultural resource.

Agency Coordination:

Agency coordination in regards to 23 CFR 771 is complete.

The NPS Superintendent and Interdisciplinary team reviewed the scope of work and supporting documentation provided in the Planning, Environment, and Public Comment (PEPC) system, and all applicable associated compliance documentation and consultation (e.g., National Environmental Policy Act, National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Wilderness Act, Tribal consultation under EO13175, other related laws and policies). FHWA reviewed species, wetlands, flood zones, and other environmental attributes.

FHWA coordinated with the U.S. FWS in February and March 2019. A NLAA Concurrence Verification Letter was provided to FHWA on March 4, 2019. According to the letter:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has received your request dated to verify that the GRSM 15(1) (Proposed Action) may rely on the concurrence provided in the February 5, 2018, FHWA, FRA, FTA Programmatic Biological Opinion for Transportation Projects within the Range of the Indiana Bat and Northern Long-eared Bat (PBO) to satisfy requirements under Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C 1531 et seq.).

Based on the information you provided (Project Description shown below), you have determined that the Proposed Action is within the scope and adheres to the criteria of the PBO, including the adoption of applicable avoidance and minimization measures, may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect (NLAA) the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) and/or the threatened Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis).

The Service has 14 calendar days to notify the lead Federal action agency or designated non- federal representative if we determine that the Proposed Action does not meet the criteria for a NLAA determination under the PBO. If we do not notify the lead Federal action agency or designated non-federal representative within that timeframe, you may proceed with the Proposed Action under the terms of the NLAA concurrence provided in the PBO. This verification period allows Service Field Offices to apply local knowledge to implementation of the PBO, as we may identify a small subset of actions having impacts that were unanticipated. In such instances, Service Field Offices may request additional information that is necessary to verify inclusion of the proposed action under the PBO.

A March 2019 search in the U.S. FWS National Wetlands Inventory mapper tool, a February

NP-GRSM 15(1) Page 4 of 5

2019 U.S. FWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) project planning tool search, and a U.S. Department of Interior FWS letter dated February 25, 2019 identified 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species; 1 critical habitat; 5 migratory birds; and known wetland areas (i.e., Riverine R2UBH) that may occur within the boundary of the proposed project and/or may be affected by the proposed project.

The NPS completed NHPA compliance consultation and cleared the proposed project/action(s) in October 2018. In the event of the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources, work will halt and the archeologist will be contacted. Work will not resume until archeologist gives approval to resume. If ground disturbing work outside of previously disturbed areas becomes necessary, cultural resource staff is to be contacted prior to the start of this work.

Environmental Screening Form NP-GRSM 15(1) Page 1 of 2

Appendix A: Environmental Screening Form

Water and Wetlands:

• Section 404 of the Clean Water Act

Impacts to Waters of the US: ☐Yes ☒No If Yes, approval anticipated:

☐Nationwide Permit ☐Regional General Permit ☐Individual Permit

• Section 401 of the Clean Water Act ☐NWP certified by State ☐Individual Certification

• Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) Disturbance Threshold Exceeded, Permit Required?

☐Yes ☒ No Is Stormwater Management Review/Approval anticipated?

☐Yes ☒No

• ☒Project is consistent with Executive Order 11900, Protection of Wetlands Floodplains:

• ☒ Project is consistent with Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management Proposed project actions have the potential to occur in FEMA Flood Zone X, area of minimal flood hazard.

Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act:

• Meets Section 4(f) exemption for Federal lands transportation facilities under Section

1119(c)(2) of MAP-21, U.S.C. 138(a)?

☒Yes ☐No

• Is there a Section 4(f) property in the study area?

☐Yes ☒No If Yes, continue:

De Minimis Finding:☐ Programmatic:☐ _______________________________ Individual 4(f): ☐

Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund:

• Was the property purchased with grant funds from the Land and Water Conservation Fund?

☐Yes ☒No

• If Yes, was documentation of approval from National Park Service Director received for the conversion or replacement of 6(f) property? ☐Yes ☐No Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972:

• Not in Coastal Zone ☒

• Concurrence with Federal Consistency Determination ☐

Right of Way:

• Project is completely within Federal right-of-way ☒

• Project involves relocations or easements ☐

Number of Easements________ Number of Relocations________

Environmental Screening Form NP-GRSM 15(1) Page 2 of 2

Hazardous Waste and Materials:

• Are hazardous materials or contamination exceeding regulatory thresholds (as set by U.S.

EPA, County Environmental Health, etc.) present? ☐Yes ☒No

• If Yes, is the nature and extent of the hazardous materials or contamination fully known?☐ If No, briefly discuss the plan for securing information:

FHWA secures any appropriate documentation, approvals, or disapprovals for applicable hazardous materials or contamination regulations and maintains oversight to ensure thresholds are not exceeded.

Section 7(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act:

• Are there Wild and Scenic Rivers? ☐Yes ☒No

If Yes, review by river-administering agency is required.

Clean Air Act:

• Is the project in a non-attainment area? ☒Yes ☐No If Yes, is the project on the TIP/SIP? ☒ Yes ☐No

Highway Traffic and Construction Noise Regulations:

• ☐ The proposed project is a Type I project (highway on a new location, substantial horizontal or vertical alteration, new through or auxiliary lanes). Noise analysis is required.

• ☐ The proposed project is a Type II project (retrofit for noise abatement).

• ☒ The proposed project is a Type III project (noise analysis not required).

Environmental Justice and Title IV Act:

• Is an Environmental Justice population, as identified in Executive Order 12898, present?

☐Yes ☒No If Yes, briefly explain:

• Will the project induce disproportionately high and adverse impacts to minority, low income or special groups? ☐Yes ☒No If Yes, briefly explain:

Farmland Protection Policy Act for Highway Projects:

• Does the project displace, require acquisition of, or require an easement from farmland?

☐Yes ☒No

Does the project affect any additional resources? If Yes, explain below:

Categorical Exclusion Category Page 1 of 4

NP-GRSM 15(1)

Appendix B: 23 CFR 771.117 FHWA Categorical Exclusions

(c) The following actions meet the criteria for CEs in the CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1508.4) and §771.117(a) and normally do not require any further NEPA approvals by the FHWA:

☐ (1) Activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as planning and research activities; grants for training; engineering to define the elements of a proposed action or alternatives so that social, economic, and environmental effects can be assessed; and Federal-aid system revisions which establish classes of highways on the Federal-aid highway system.

☐ (2) Approval of utility installations along or across a transportation facility.

☐ (3) Construction of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths, and facilities.

☐ (4) Activities included in the State's highway safety plan under 23 U.S.C. 402.

☐ (5) Transfer of Federal lands pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 107(d) and/or 23 U.S.C. 317 when the land transfer is in support of an action that is not otherwise subject to FHWA review under NEPA.

☐ (6) The installation of noise barriers or alterations to existing publicly owned buildings to provide for noise reduction.

☐ (7) Landscaping.

☐ (8) Installation of fencing, signs, pavement markings, small passenger shelters, traffic signals, and railroad warning devices where no substantial land acquisition or traffic disruption will occur.

☐ (9) The following actions for transportation facilities damaged by an incident resulting in an emergency declared by the Governor of the State and concurred in by the Secretary, or a disaster or emergency declared by the President pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Act (42 U.S.C. 5121):

(i) Emergency repairs under 23 U.S.C. 125; and

(ii) The repair, reconstruction, restoration, retrofitting, or replacement of any road, highway, bridge, tunnel, or transit facility (such as a ferry dock or bus transfer station), including ancillary transportation facilities (such as pedestrian/bicycle paths and bike lanes), that is in operation or under construction when damaged and the action:

(A) Occurs within the existing right-of-way and in a manner that substantially conforms to the preexisting design, function, and location as the original (which may include upgrades to meet existing codes and standards as well as upgrades warranted to address conditions that have changed since the original construction; and

(B) Is commenced within a 2-year period beginning on the date of the declaration.

☐ (10) Acquisition of scenic easements.

☐ (11) Determination of payback under 23 U.S.C. 156 for property previously acquired with Federal-aid participation.

☐ (12) Improvements to existing rest areas and truck weigh stations.

☐ (13) Ridesharing activities.

☐ (14) Bus and rail car rehabilitation.

☐ (15) Alterations to facilities or vehicles in order to make them accessible for elderly and handicapped persons.

☐ (16) Program administration, technical assistance activities, and operating assistance to transit authorities to continue existing service or increase service to meet routine changes in demand.

☐ (17) The purchase of vehicles by the applicant where the use of these vehicles can be accommodated by existing facilities or by new facilities which themselves are within a CE.

Categorical Exclusion Category Page 2 of 4

☐ (18) Track and railbed maintenance and improvements when carried out within the existing right-of-way.

☐ (19) Purchase and installation of operating or maintenance equipment to be located within the transit facility and with no significant impacts off the site.

☐ (20) Promulgation of rules, regulations, and directives.

☐ (21) Deployment of electronics, photonics, communications, or information processing used singly or in combination, or as components of a fully integrated system, to improve the efficiency or safety of a surface transportation system or to enhance security or passenger convenience.

Examples include, but are not limited to, traffic control and detector devices, lane management systems, electronic payment equipment, automatic vehicle locaters, automated passenger counters, computer-aided dispatching systems, radio communications systems, dynamic message signs, and security equipment including surveillance and detection cameras on roadways and in transit facilities and on buses.

☒ (22) Projects, as defined in 23 U.S.C. 101, that would take place entirely within the existing operational right-of-way. Existing operational right-of-way refers to right-of-way that has been disturbed for an existing transportation facility or is maintained for a transportation purpose. This area includes the features associated with the physical footprint of the transportation facility (including the roadway, bridges, interchanges, culverts, drainage, fixed guideways, mitigation areas, etc.) and other areas maintained for transportation purposes such as clear zone, traffic control signage, landscaping, any rest areas with direct access to a controlled access highway, areas maintained for safety and security of a transportation facility, parking facilities with direct access to an existing transportation facility, transit power substations, transit venting structures, and transit maintenance facilities. Portions of the right-of-way that have not been disturbed or that are not maintained for transportation purposes are not in the existing operational right-of-way.

☐ (23) Federally-funded projects:

(i) That receive less than $5,000,000 of Federal funds; or

(ii) With a total estimated cost of not more than $30,000,000 and Federal funds comprising less than 15 percent of the total estimated project cost.

☐ (24) Localized geotechnical and other investigation to provide information for preliminary design and for environmental analyses and permitting purposes, such as drilling test bores for soil sampling; archeological investigations for archeology resources assessment or similar survey; and wetland surveys.

☐ (25) Environmental restoration and pollution abatement actions to minimize or mitigate the impacts of any existing transportation facility (including retrofitting and construction of stormwater treatment systems to meet Federal and State requirements under sections 401 and 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1341; 1342)) carried out to address water pollution or environmental degradation.

☐ (26) Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (including parking, weaving, turning, and climbing lanes), if the action meets the constraints in paragraph (e) of this section.

☐ (27) Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects, including the installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting, if the project meets the constraints in paragraph (e) of this section.

Categorical Exclusion Category Page 3 of 4

☐ (28) Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings, if the actions meet the constraints in paragraph (e) of this section.

☐ (29) Purchase, construction, replacement, or rehabilitation of ferry vessels (including improvements to ferry vessel safety, navigation, and security systems) that would not require a change in the function of the ferry terminals and can be accommodated by existing facilities or by new facilities which themselves are within a CE.

☐ (30) Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing ferry facilities that occupy substantially the same geographic footprint, do not result in a change in their functional use, and do not result in a substantial increase in the existing facility's capacity. Example actions include work on pedestrian and vehicle transfer structures and associated utilities, buildings, and terminals.

(d) Additional actions which meet the criteria for a CE in the CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1508.4) and paragraph (a) of this section may be designated as CEs only after Administration approval unless otherwise authorized under an executed agreement pursuant to paragraph (g) of this section. The applicant shall submit documentation which demonstrates that the specific conditions or criteria for these CEs are satisfied and that significant environmental effects will not result. Examples of such actions include but are not limited to:

☐ (1)-(3) [Reserved] ☐ (4) Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.

☐ (5) Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.

☐ (6) Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse impacts.

☐ (7) Approvals for changes in access control.

☐ (8) Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support vehicle traffic.

☐ (9) Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.

☐ (10) Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.

☐ (11) Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no significant noise impact on the surrounding community.

☐ (12) Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes. Hardship and protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives, including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.

(i) Hardship acquisition is early acquisition of property by the applicant at the property owner's request to alleviate particular hardship to the owner, in contrast to others, because of an inability

Categorical Exclusion Category Page 4 of 4 to sell his property. This is justified when the property owner can document on the basis of health, safety or financial reasons that remaining in the property poses an undue hardship compared to others.

(ii) Protective acquisition is done to prevent imminent development of a parcel which may be needed for a proposed transportation corridor or site. Documentation must clearly demonstrate that development of the land would preclude future transportation use and that such development is imminent. Advance acquisition is not permitted for the sole purpose of reducing the cost of property for a proposed project.

☐ (13) Actions described in paragraphs (c)(26), (c)(27), and (c)(28) of this section that do not meet the constraints in paragraph (e) of this section.

(e) Actions described in (c)(26), (c)(27), and (c)(28) of this section may not be processed as CEs under paragraph (c) if they involve:

(1) An acquisition of more than a minor amount of right-of-way or that would result in any residential or non-residential displacements.

Yes ☐ No ☐

(2) An action that needs a bridge permit from the U.S. Coast Guard, or an action that does not meet the terms and conditions of a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers nationwide or general permit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.

Yes ☐ No ☐

(3) A finding of “adverse effect” to historic properties under the National Historic Preservation Act, the use of a resource protected under 23 U.S.C. 138 or 49 U.S.C. 303 (section 4(f)) except for actions resulting in de minimis impacts, or a finding of “may affect, likely to adversely affect” threatened or endangered species or critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act.

Yes ☐ No☐

(4) Construction of temporary access, or the closure of existing road, bridge, or ramps, that would result in major traffic disruptions.

Yes ☐ No☐

(5) Changes in access control.

Yes ☐ No☐

(6) A floodplain encroachment other than functionally dependent uses (e.g., bridges, wetlands) or actions that facilitate open space use (e.g., recreational trails, bicycle and pedestrian paths); or construction activities in, across or adjacent to a river component designated or proposed for inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers.

Yes ☐ No☐

Letter of Compliance Completion - Repair Bote Mountain Tunnel - PEPC ID: 77207

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior

Great Smoky Mountains National Park Date: 10/24/2018

Letter of Compliance Completion

To: Imelda Wegwerth and Mike Tomkosky

From: Mark Collins

Subject: NEPA and NHPA Clearance: Repair Bote Mountain Tunnel (PEPC: 77207)(PMIS: 157247)

NEPA and NHPA Compliance Complete. For complete compliance information see PEPC Project 77207.

The Superintendent and Interdisciplinary team have reviewed the scope of work and supporting documentation provided in the Planning, Environment, and Public Comment (PEPC) system, and all applicable associated compliance documentation and consultation (e.g. National Environmental Policy Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Wilderness Act, Tribal consultation under EO13175, and other related laws and policies).

The subject proposed project/action(s), therefore, is/are now cleared for all compliance requirements. Project plans and specifications are approved, project funds may be released, and construction and/or project implementation can commence with the following mitigations and conditions/stipulations.

Required Mitigations - For the proposed project actions to be within compliance requirements during construction and/or project implementation, the following mitigations must be adhered to.

• A public information program to warn of temporary closures, delays, and road hazards during construction shall be implemented. This program would help convey appropriate messages to the public and aid in mitigating potential impacts on visitors' expectations and experiences. Schedule repair work to minimize visitor impacts to the extent possible.

• All storm sewer inlets that are in or near or made operable during construction projects shall be protected so that sediment-laden water cannot enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment or construction materials such as grout or cement.

• In the event of the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources, work will halt and the archeologist will be contacted. Work will not resume until archeologist gives approval to resume. If ground disturbing work outside of previously disturbed areas becomes necessary, cultural resource staff is to be contacted prior to the start of this work.

• Cultural resource staff is to be contacted if scope changes occur as project is further defined through the development of construction/contract documents to confirm the project conforms to streamlined activities.

NHPA Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

See mitigation list.

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Tennessee Ecological Services Field Office

446 Neal Street

Cookeville, TN 38501-4027

Phone: (931) 528-6481 Fax: (931) 528-7075

In Reply Refer To:

Consultation Code: 04ET1000-2019-I-0382

Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664

Project Name: GRSM 15(1)

Subject: Concurrence verification letter for the 'GRSM 15(1)' project under the revised

February 5, 2018, FHWA, FRA, FTA Programmatic Biological Opinion for

Transportation Projects within the Range of the Indiana Bat and Northern Long-eared

Bat.

To whom it may concern:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has received your request dated to verify that the

GRSM 15(1) (Proposed Action) may rely on the concurrence provided in the February 5, 2018, FHWA, FRA, FTA Programmatic Biological Opinion for Transportation Projects within the

Range of the Indiana Bat and Northern Long-eared Bat (PBO) to satisfy requirements under

Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16

U.S.C 1531 et seq.).

Based on the information you provided (Project Description shown below), you have determined that the Proposed Action is within the scope and adheres to the criteria of the PBO, including the adoption of applicable avoidance and minimization measures, may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect (NLAA) the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) and/or the threatened

Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis).

The Service has 14 calendar days to notify the lead Federal action agency or designated non-federal representative if we determine that the Proposed Action does not meet the criteria for a

NLAA determination under the PBO. If we do not notify the lead Federal action agency or designated non-federal representative within that timeframe, you may proceed with the Proposed

Action under the terms of the NLAA concurrence provided in the PBO. This verification period allows Service Field Offices to apply local knowledge to implementation of the PBO, as we may identify a small subset of actions having impacts that were unanticipated. In such instances, Service Field Offices may request additional information that is necessary to verify inclusion of the proposed action under the PBO.

March 04, 2019

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 2

For Proposed Actions that include bridge/structure removal, replacement, and/or maintenance activities: If your initial bridge/structure assessments failed to detect Indiana bats, but you later detect bats during construction, please submit the Post Assessment Discovery of

Bats at Bridge/Structure Form (User Guide Appendix E) to this Service Office. In these instances, potential incidental take of Indiana bats may be exempted provided that the take is reported to the Service.

If the Proposed Action is modified, or new information reveals that it may affect the Indiana bat and/or Northern long-eared bat in a manner or to an extent not considered in the PBO, further review to conclude the requirements of ESA Section 7(a)(2) may be required. If the Proposed

Action may affect any other federally-listed or proposed species, and/or any designated critical habitat, additional consultation is required. If the proposed action has the potential to take bald or golden eagles, additional coordination with the Service under the Bald and Golden Eagle

Protection Act may also be required. In either of these circumstances, please contact this Service

Office.

The following species may occur in your project area and are not covered by this determination:

▪ Duskytail Darter, Etheostoma percnurum (Endangered)

▪ Finerayed Pigtoe, Fusconaia cuneolus (Endangered)

▪ Gray Bat, Myotis grisescens (Endangered)

▪ Oyster Mussel, Epioblasma capsaeformis (Endangered)

▪ Snail Darter, Percina tanasi (Threatened)

▪ Spreading Avens, Geum radiatum (Endangered)

▪ Virginia Spiraea, Spiraea virginiana (Threatened)

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 3

Project Description The following project name and description was collected in IPaC as part of the endangered species review process.

Name

GRSM 15(1)

Description

This project consists of repairing the Bote Mountain Tunnel within the Great Smoky

Mountains National Park in Blount County, Tennessee. The project length is 0.11 miles (600 feet). Project work includes repair to the concrete lining, replacing the tunnel drainage system, removing loose stones above portals, cleaning drainage inlets and culverts, asphalt concrete pavement milling and overlay, permanent pavement markings, and other miscellaneous work. Soil disturbing activities include ditch reconditioning, shoulder reconditioning, and paved waterway construction. The total disturbed area for the project is approximately 0.04 acres.

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 4

Determination Key Result Based on your answers provided, this project(s) may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the endangered Indiana bat and/or the threatened Northern long-eared bat. Therefore, consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to Section 7(a)(2) of the

Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat. 884, as amended 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is required. However, also based on your answers provided, this project may rely on the concurrence provided in the revised February 5, 2018, FHWA, FRA, FTA Programmatic

Biological Opinion for Transportation Projects within the Range of the Indiana Bat and Northern

Long-eared Bat.

Qualification Interview

1. Is the project within the range of the Indiana bat ?

[1] See Indiana bat species profile

Automatically answered

Yes

2. Is the project within the range of the Northern long-eared bat ?

[1] See Northern long-eared bat species profile

Automatically answered

Yes

3. Which Federal Agency is the lead for the action?

A) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

4. Are all project activities limited to non-construction activities only? (examples of non-construction activities include: bridge/abandoned structure assessments, surveys, planning and technical studies, property inspections, and property sales)

[1] Construction refers to activities involving ground disturbance, percussive noise, and/or lighting.

No

5. Does the project include any activities that are greater than 300 feet from existing road/ rail surfaces ?

[1] Road surface is defined as the actively used [e.g. motorized vehicles] driving surface and shoulders [may be pavement, gravel, etc.] and rail surface is defined as the edge of the actively used rail ballast.

No

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1] http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=A000 http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/profile/speciesProfile?spcode=A0JE

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 5

6. Does the project include any activities within 0.5 miles of a known Indiana bat and/or

NLEB hibernaculum ?

[1] For the purpose of this consultation, a hibernaculum is a site, most often a cave or mine, where bats hibernate during the winter (see suitable habitat), but could also include bridges and structures if bats are found to be hibernating there during the winter.

No

7. Is the project located within a karst area?

No

8. Is there any suitable summer habitat for Indiana Bat or NLEB within the project action area ? (includes any trees suitable for maternity, roosting, foraging, or travelling habitat)

[1] See the Service’s summer survey guidance for our current definitions of suitable habitat.

[2] The action area is defined as all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely the immediate area involved in the action (50 CFR Section 402.02). Further clarification is provided by the national consultation FAQs.

No

9. Does the project include maintenance of the surrounding landscape at existing facilities

(e.g., rest areas, stormwater detention basins)?

No

10. Does the project include wetland or stream protection activities associated with compensatory wetland mitigation?

No

11. Does the project include slash pile burning?

No

12. Does the project include any bridge removal, replacement, and/or maintenance activities

(e.g., any bridge repair, retrofit, maintenance, and/or rehabilitation work)?

No

13. Does the project include the removal, replacement, and/or maintenance of any structure other than a bridge? (e.g., rest areas, offices, sheds, outbuildings, barns, parking garages, etc.)

Yes

[1]

[1]

[2] https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/inba/inbasummersurveyguidance.html https://www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/faq.html#18

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 6

14. Is there any suitable habitat for Indiana bat or NLEB within 1,000 feet of the structure?

(includes any trees suitable for maternity, roosting, foraging, or travelling habitat)

[1] See the Service’s current summer survey guidance for our current definitions of suitable habitat.

Yes

15. Has a structure assessment been conducted within the last 24 months to determine if bats are using the structure(s)?

[1] Structure assessment for occupied buildings means a cursory inspection for bat use. For abandoned buildings a more thorough evaluation is required (See User Guide Appendix D for bridge/abandoned structure assessment guidance).

[2] Assessments must be completed no more than 2 years prior to conducting any work on the structures, regardless of whether assessments have been conducted in the past. Due to the transitory nature of bat use, a negative result in one year does not guarantee that bats will not use that structure in subsequent years.

No

16. Is the structure within a known maternity colony's home range ?

[1] A structure assessment is required for structure projects that are within the home range of a known maternity colony. Contact your local FWS office for more information if you are uncertain about where the nearest known maternity colony is located.

No

[1]

[1] [2]

[1] https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/section7/fhwa/pdf/AppDBridgeStructueAssessmentGuidanceMay2017.pdf

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 7

17. Have presence/probable absence (P/A) summer surveys been conducted for this project with at least one survey point within suitable habitat and within 0.25 miles of the structure(s) ?

[1] See the Service's summer survey guidance for our current definitions of suitable habitat.

[2] Presence/probable absence summer surveys conducted within the fall swarming/spring emergence home range of a documented Indiana bat hibernaculum (contact local Service Field Office for appropriate distance from hibernacula) that result in a negative finding requires additional consultation with the local Service Field Office to determine if seasonal restrictions are needed to avoid and minimize potential adverse effects on fall swarming and spring emerging Indiana bats.

[3] For projects within the range of either the Indiana bat or NLEB in which suitable habitat is present, and no bat surveys have been conducted, the transportation agency will assume presence of the appropriate species. This assumption of presence should be based upon the presence of suitable habitat and the capability of bats to occupy it because of their mobility.

[4] Negative presence/probable absence survey results obtained using the summer survey guidance are valid for a minimum of two years from the completion of the survey unless new information (e.g., other nearby surveys) suggest otherwise.

No

18. Will the structure removal, replacement, and/or maintenance activities disturb the maternity colony (or assumed maternity colony) of bats using the structure(s)?

Note: if a Structure Assessment was not conducted, P/A surveys were not accepted by the local FWS office to show absence, and/or the structure(s) is within a known maternity colony's home range, then in addition to assuming bats are using the structure, it is also assumed a maternity colony of bats are using the structure)

No

19. Will any structure removal, replacement, and/or maintenance activities be done outside of the Indiana bat and/or NLEB active season? (i.e. will maintenance activities be done during the winter hibernation period )

[1] Coordinate with the local Service Field Office for appropriate dates.

Yes

20. Will any structure removal, replacement, and/or maintenance activities be done during the

Indiana bat and/or NLEB active season? (i.e. will maintenance activities be done during the spring, summer, and/or fall )

[1] Coordinate with the local Service Field Office for appropriate dates.

No

[1][2]

[3][4]

[1]

[1]

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 8

21. Will your structure related activities disturb or harass roosting bats in any way? (example activities that would not be expected to disturb bats include activities away from roosts inside common rooms and structures, and normal cleaning and routine maintenance)

No

22. Will the structure removal, replacement, and/or maintenance activities maintain suitable bat roosting habitat? (note: suitable roosting sites may be incorporated into the design of a replacement structure)

Yes

23. Will the structure removal, replacement, and/or maintenance activities include installing new or replacing existing permanent lighting?

No

24. Will the project involve the use of temporary lighting during the active season?

No

25. Will the project install new or replace existing permanent lighting?

No

26. Are all project activities that are not associated with habitat removal, tree removal/ trimming, bridge and/or structure activities, temporary or permanent lighting, or use of percussives, limited to actions that DO NOT cause any additional stressors to the bat species?

Examples: lining roadways, unlighted signage , rail road crossing signals, signal lighting, and minor road repair such as asphalt fill of potholes, etc.

Yes

27. Will the project raise the road profile above the tree canopy?

No

28. Is the location of this project consistent with a No Effect determination in this key?

Automatically answered

Yes, because the project action area not within suitable Indiana bat and/or NLEB summer habitat and is outside of 0.5 miles of a hibernaculum.

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 9

29. Is the structure removal, replacement, or maintenance activities portion of this project consistent with a Not Likely to Adversely Affect determination in this key?

Automatically answered

Yes, because the activities are outside the active season, are not expected to disturb or harass roosting bats in any way, and suitable roosting sites will be maintained

30. General AMM 1

Will the project ensure all operators, employees, and contractors working in areas of known or presumed bat habitat are aware of all FHWA/FRA/FTA (Transportation

Agencies) environmental commitments, including all applicable Avoidance and

Minimization Measures?

Yes

31. Structure AMM 1

If the goal of the project is to exclude bats from the structure, will you coordinate with your local Service Field Office and follow the Acceptable Management Practices for Bat

Control Activities in Structures guidance document (White-nose Syndrome Conservation and Recovery Working Group 2015)?

N/A

32. Structure AMM 2

For structure maintenance, repair, and/or alteration activities conducted outside the active season, will you determine if there are hibernating bats in the area of the structure(s) where work will occur?

Yes

33. Structure AMM 2

If hibernating bats (or signs of frequent bat activity) are observed in the area of the structure(s) where work will occur, will all maintenance activity or similar structure alteration be conducted in a manner that will not disturb the hibernating bats?

Yes

34. Structure AMM 4

Will you avoid removing the structure(s) if roosting bats, hibernating bats, or signs of frequent bat activity are observed in/on the structure(s)?

Note: If there are concerns about human health/safety/property coordinate with a nuisance wildlife control officer and the local USFWS Field Office.

Yes https://www.whitenosesyndrome.org/sites/default/files/resource/wns_nwco_amp_1_april_2015_0.pdf https://www.whitenosesyndrome.org/sites/default/files/resource/wns_nwco_amp_1_april_2015_0.pdf

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 10

Project Questionnaire

1. Have you made a No Effect determination for all other species indicated on the FWS IPaC generated species list?

Yes

2. Have you made a May Affect determination for any other species on the FWS IPaC generated species list?

No

3. Please describe the proposed structure work:

This project consists of preventative maintenance work to Bote Mountain Tunnel within the

Great Smoky Mountains National Park in Blount County, Tennessee. The project length is

0.11 miles (600 feet). Project work includes repair to the concrete lining, replacing the tunnel drainage system, removing loose stones above portals, cleaning drainage inlets and culverts, asphalt concrete pavement milling and overlay, permanent pavement markings, and other miscellaneous work.

4. Please state the timing of all proposed structure work:

November - March

Avoidance And Minimization Measures (AMMs) These measures were accepted as part of this determination key result:

GENERAL AMM 1

Ensure all operators, employees, and contractors working in areas of known or presumed bat habitat are aware of all FHWA/FRA/FTA (Transportation Agencies) environmental commitments, including all applicable AMMs.

STRUCTURE AMM 2

If structure maintenance, repair, and/or alteration will be performed during the winter hibernation period, determine if work will occur in an area with hibernating bats. If hibernating bats or signs of frequent bat activity are observed, Transportation Agencies and State DOTs will conduct maintenance activity or similar structure alteration in a manner that will not disturb bats using the structure.

STRUCTURE AMM 4

If bat activity (or signs of frequent bat activity) is observed, Transportation Agencies and State

DOTs will not remove the structure.

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 11

Note: If there are concerns about human health/safety/property, coordinate with a nuisance wildlife control officer and the local USFWS Field Office.

03/04/2019 Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00664 12

Determination Key Description: FHWA, FRA, FTA Programmatic Consultation For Transportation Projects Affecting NLEB Or Indiana Bat This key was last updated in IPaC on March 16, 2018. Keys are subject to periodic revision.

This decision key is intended for projects/activities funded or authorized by the Federal Highway

Administration (FHWA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and/or Federal Transit

Administration (FTA), which require consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

(Service) under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the endangered Indiana bat

(Myotis sodalis) and the threatened Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis).

This decision key should only be used to verify project applicability with the Service’s February

5, 2018, FHWA, FRA, FTA Programmatic Biological Opinion for Transportation Projects. The programmatic biological opinion covers limited transportation activities that may affect either bat species, and addresses situations that are both likely and not likely to adversely affect either bat species. This decision key will assist in identifying the effect of a specific project/activity and applicability of the programmatic consultation. The programmatic biological opinion is not intended to cover all types of transportation actions. Activities outside the scope of the programmatic biological opinion, or that may affect ESA-listed species other than the Indiana bat or NLEB, or any designated critical habitat, may require additional ESA Section 7 consultation.

https://www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/section7/fhwa/index.html https://www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/section7/fhwa/index.html

United States Department of the Interior

FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Tennessee Ecological Services Field Office

446 Neal Street

Cookeville, TN 38501-4027

Phone: (931) 528-6481 Fax: (931) 528-7075

In Reply Refer To:

Consultation Code: 04ET1000-2019-SLI-0382

Event Code: 04ET1000-2019-E-00625

Project Name: GRSM 15(1)

Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project

To Whom It May Concern:

The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the

Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the

Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.