Q&A_01-30-2020.pdf
PDF 98 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MT Phillips 364(1), Short Oil Road
- Solicitation number
- 69056720B000007
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to solicitation number 69056720B000007 for MT Phillips 364(1), Short Oil Road project. The questions and answers provide clarification on technical requirements, including confirmation to bid according to the solicitation documents for asphalt and traffic paint specifications. One question asks if the owner would consider recycling existing asphalt and base for the project. The owner responds to bid according to the solicitation and does not indicate an alternative. Another question asks if a different grade of asphalt binder would be considered due to regional availability issues; the owner again responds to bid according to the solicitation documents. No other details are provided on products, services, pricing, or timelines for the federal contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Bid Opening Summary_Short Oil.pdf | ||
| Amendment A004_R1.pdf | ||
| Q&A_02-18-2020.pdf | ||
| Amendment A004.pdf | ||
| Amendment A003.pdf | ||
| Q&A_02-07-2020.pdf | ||
| Amendment A002.pdf | ||
| Amendment A001.pdf | ||
| Q&A_01-29-2020.pdf | ||
| IFB_Short Oil Road.pdf | ||
| Plan Request form.pdf | ||
| Plans_mt-a2015013_StampedandSigned.pdf | ||
| mt-a2015013_PavementReport.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MT Phillips 364(1) (RESOL) Short Oil Road
# General Technical Question Answer Date
1 X
Under the Special contract requirements (403.02) it states: Submit a Montana Department of Transportation JMF approved within the past 12 months…….., Is it possible to submit a (new) JMF that has NOT been approved by MDOT but meets all of the their specifications. Since this is not one of their projects, they will not use resources to approve a JMF. Our closest mix design that MDOT has approved in the last 12 months would come from East of Lewistown MT. (145.0 miles away)
This will be addressed under a forthcoming amendment.
1/29/2020
2 X
It appears that they are calling for 634.04 Solventborne Traffic Paint (Type A). We haven't been able to procure this material for years. I think it’s been phased out of other federal projects and they have been using 634.05 Waterborne Traffic Paint Type B. Please verify.
Bid according to the solicitation documents. 1/29/2020
Check General or Technical
3 X
Pay item # 20303‐1600 – Removal of Pavement, Asphalt. Would the owner entertain recycling the existing asphalt and base? I’ve read the pavement report, but utilization of all the existing material that’s in place would help decrease the subgrades exposure pumping of clay soil due to wheel traffic.
Bid according to the solicitation documents. 1/29/2020
4 X
Per special contract requirement 403.01, the asphalt binder designated for this project is PG 58‐34. Would the owner entertain using a different grade of asphalt binder? The designated binder appears to be limited in regional availability. Most of the past projects that we’ve encountered in this tri‐county area from the MDOT contain PG 64‐28 asphalt binder. If the owner entertained at least an alternative pricing bid item, it might give some perspective for cost comparing.
Bid according to the solicitation documents. 1/30/2020
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .