Vendor+Response+Evaluation+Worksheet.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Grant Writer Services Pool
Contract number
344-HDR
Issued by
North Dakota

About this file

This document is a Vendor Response Evaluation Worksheet for a State Contract 344 for Grant Writer Services, specifically designed to guide the evaluation process for selecting vendor proposals. The document appears to be associated with a state procurement process, likely in North Dakota, as the contact number provided is a 701 area code, and references the State Procurement Office.

The worksheet outlines a structured evaluation methodology for assessing grant writing service vendors, with a total of 100 possible points distributed across three key criteria: Vendor Solution (30 points), Qualifications and Availability of Vendor Staff (40 points), and Cost (30 points). The evaluation process includes a rating scale that allows for nuanced scoring from 0-30 points per criterion, with evaluators assessing factors such as solution quality, staff qualifications, availability, and pricing. The document indicates a formal procurement process where vendors will be scored systematically, with the intent of selecting the most advantageous proposal for grant writing services.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
344_State+Contract+Summary-+Update+05-07-2024.docx DOCX document
Amendment#+1.pdf PDF
Amendment+2+Signed.pdf PDF
HDR+Contract+Grant+Writing+Services+Pool.pdf PDF
Task+Order+Request+Form.docx DOCX document
Change+Order+Form.docx DOCX document
HDR+Amendment#+3+Signed.pdf PDF
Notice+of+Grant+Writing+Services+Award.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

VENDOR RESPONSE EVALUATION WORKSHEET

INSTRUCTIONS: REVISE EVALUATION CRITERIA AND POINTS TO MATCH #10 OF THE PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM

DELETE ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PRINTING.

THE EVALUATION SUMMARY MUST BE SENT ALONG WITH THE PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM SO VENDORS HAVE THE SAME INFORMATION THAT WILL BE USED TO SCORE THEIR RESPONSES

INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVALUATORS

When preparing a participating addendum, the association must develop evaluation criteria that will be used to evaluate the vendor responses. Assign each evaluation criterion, including cost, a specific number of points totaling 100. The questions under each evaluated area help you measure the quality of the offeror’s response. All items in blue can be edited to meet association needs. Do not assign points to individual questions; instead, award a total score for each evaluation criterion.

RATING SCALE FOR ASSESSING VENDOR RESPONSES

Rating scales are intended to establish guidelines for awarding points within an evaluation criterion. You may assign any value for a given criteria from 0 to the maximum number of points. A zero value typically constitutes no response or an inability of the vendor to meet the criterion. In contrast, the maximum value should constitute a high standard of meeting the criterion.

If a specific criterion would only yield a yes or no response (e.g., offeror can submit an electronic report in required format by noon Friday), the evaluator should award either the maximum points or a zero. For Example: “Vendor Solution” is an evaluation criteria receiving a weighting of 30% of the total possible points. The rating scale would be:

* Be sure the evaluation criteria and associated point values on the evaluation worksheet correspond with item 10 of the Participating Addendum Request

Rating Scale (30 POINT Maximum)

Point Value

Explanation

0-5
None. Not addressed or no applicability.
5-10
Poor. Minimal applicability.
11-15
Fair. Limited applicability
16-20
Good. Some applicability
21-25
Very Good. Substantial applicability
25-30
Excellent. Total applicability

ASSISTANCE

Contact the State Procurement Office at 701-328-2773 for assistance in developing evaluation criteria and evaluating proposals.

AWARD NOTICE

After selecting the most advantageous proposal, send out a notice of award to all vendors that responded to the Participating Addendum. Association and vendor must wait for seven (7) days before executing the Participating Addendum

State Contract 344 Grant Writer Services Pool Proposal Evaluation Worksheet

Association Name:

Evaluator Name:

Date:

Vendor:

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Maximum Possible Points
Score of Vendor Proposal
Comments on Vendor Proposal

1. Vendor Solution Consider:

What is the quality of the proposed solution?

How well does the proposed solution meet the requirements stated in the scope of work?

2. Qualifications and Availability of Vendor Staff Consider:

What is the availability of vendor staff?

What are the qualifications of the vendor staff based upon vendor staff resumes and reference checks?

Cost Evaluation Price of Lowest Cost Proposal Price of Proposal Being Rated X Points Assigned to Cost = Awarded Points

3. Cost

Total

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .