18R0012_FAS_PPQ_Attch_4.docx

18 KB Posted

Attached to
FISMA Audit Services
Solicitation number
60RRBH18R0012
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Past Performance Evaluation Form & Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
18R0012_FAS_RFP_Amendment_0002_Page_1_Final.pdf PDF
18R0012_FAS_0001_-_AOQ_Attachment_5_Revision_1_Final.docx DOCX document
18R0012_FAS_NDA_Attch_3_v2_.docx DOCX document
18R0012_FAS_RFP_Amendment_0002_Final.pdf PDF
18R0012_FAS_IPCC_Attch_2_v2_.docx DOCX document
18R0012_FAS_RFP_Amendment_0001_Final.pdf PDF
18R0012_FAS_0001_-_AOQ_Attachment_5_Final.docx DOCX document
18R0012_FAS_SCEPI_Attch_1.docx DOCX document
18R0012_FAS_NDA_Attch_3.docx DOCX document
18R0012_FAS_IPCC_Attch_2.docx DOCX document
18R0012_FAS_RFP_Final.pdf PDF
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Solicitation No. 60RRBH18R0012 Page 3 of 3 Attachment 4

FISMA Audit Services

OFFICE OF AUDIT

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM & PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Name of Evaluator:

Official Position:

Name of Company:

Company Address:

Phone/Fax/Email:

Name of Contractor:

Period of Performance:

Contract No. or Reference’s Name:

Contract Type:

Contract Value:

Please provide a thorough and complete description of the most recent services you have contracted for from the vendor.

Print Name: _________________________________________________

Signature: __________________________________________________ Date: ____________________

INSTRUCTIONS – For each item, circle the rating that best describes the contractor’s work on this project and provide any additional comments. For items not applicable to your project, please indicate N/A.

5 = Excellent
No problems, issues, or delays in achieving contract requirements
4 = Good
Does not impact achievement of contract requirements
3 = Satisfactory
Requires minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
2 = Marginal
Requires major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
1 = Unsatisfactory
Achievement of contract requirement is compromised
For Yes or No Questions
5 = YES; 1 = NO
N/A = Not Applicable
Does not apply
1. Overall implementation of the contract?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

2. Ability to pro-actively and aggressively perform contract requirements and quality of service?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

3. Effectiveness and reliability of contractor’s key personnel?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

4. Timeliness of performance, reliability, and ability to meet contractually established deadlines?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

5. Customer satisfaction; was the contractor’s staff responsive, cooperative, and effective in working with your staff, and were there an adequate number of staff resources?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

6. Effectiveness in interfacing with agency or organization personnel?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

7. Overall business relations with your agency or organization, and the contractor’s ability to effectively respond to inquiries?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

8. Quality of the contractor’s billing procedures, billing accuracy and resolution of billing discrepancies?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

9. Ability to meet agency’s or organization’s security requirements?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

10. Contractor’s overall technical competence?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

11. Based on this contractor’s overall performance, would you award this contractor a similar contract?
5
4
3
2
1
N/A

Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it.