Vendor+Response+Evaluation+Worksheet.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Grant Writer Services Pool
- Contract number
- 344
- Issued by
- North Dakota
About this file
This document is a Vendor Response Evaluation Worksheet for State Contract 344 for Grant Writer Services, designed to provide a standardized framework for evaluating vendor proposals. The document appears to be associated with a state procurement process, specifically referencing the State Procurement Office with a contact number of 701-328-2773, which suggests this is likely a North Dakota state contract vehicle.
The worksheet outlines a comprehensive evaluation process for grant writing services with three primary assessment categories: Vendor Solution (30 points), Qualifications and Availability of Vendor Staff (40 points), and Cost (30 points). The evaluation methodology allows for nuanced scoring across different rating scales, with point values ranging from 0-30 based on applicability and quality of vendor responses. The document mandates a seven-day waiting period after award selection and requires sending award notices to all responding vendors. The evaluation criteria focus on assessing the quality of proposed solutions, staff qualifications, availability, and pricing competitiveness for grant writing services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 344_State+Contract+Summary-+Update+05-07-2024.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment#+1.pdf | ||
| Amendment+1.pdf | ||
| HDR+Contract+Grant+Writing+Services+Pool.pdf | ||
| SRF+Contract.pdf | ||
| WSB+Amendment+2.pdf | ||
| Change+Order+Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| NDDOT+Grant+Amendment#+1.pdf | ||
| HDR+Amendment#+3+Signed.pdf | ||
| SC_344_Contract_Amendment_02_Signed.pdf | ||
| Task+Order+Request+Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| WSB+Amendment+3+Signed.pdf | ||
| WSB+Contract.pdf | ||
| Amendment+2+Signed.pdf | ||
| Notice+of+Grant+Writing+Services+Award.docx | DOCX document | |
| SRF+Amendment#+3+Signed.pdf | ||
| WSB+Contract+6-2024.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
VENDOR RESPONSE EVALUATION WORKSHEET
INSTRUCTIONS: REVISE EVALUATION CRITERIA AND POINTS TO MATCH #10 OF THE PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM
DELETE ALL INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PRINTING.
THE EVALUATION SUMMARY MUST BE SENT ALONG WITH THE PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM SO VENDORS HAVE THE SAME INFORMATION THAT WILL BE USED TO SCORE THEIR RESPONSES
INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVALUATORS
When preparing a participating addendum, the association must develop evaluation criteria that will be used to evaluate the vendor responses. Assign each evaluation criterion, including cost, a specific number of points totaling 100. The questions under each evaluated area help you measure the quality of the offeror’s response. All items in blue can be edited to meet association needs. Do not assign points to individual questions; instead, award a total score for each evaluation criterion.
RATING SCALE FOR ASSESSING VENDOR RESPONSES
Rating scales are intended to establish guidelines for awarding points within an evaluation criterion. You may assign any value for a given criteria from 0 to the maximum number of points. A zero value typically constitutes no response or an inability of the vendor to meet the criterion. In contrast, the maximum value should constitute a high standard of meeting the criterion.
If a specific criterion would only yield a yes or no response (e.g., offeror can submit an electronic report in required format by noon Friday), the evaluator should award either the maximum points or a zero. For Example: “Vendor Solution” is an evaluation criteria receiving a weighting of 30% of the total possible points. The rating scale would be:
* Be sure the evaluation criteria and associated point values on the evaluation worksheet correspond with item 10 of the Participating Addendum Request
Rating Scale (30 POINT Maximum)
Point Value
Explanation
| 0-5 |
| None. Not addressed or no applicability. |
| 5-10 |
| Poor. Minimal applicability. |
| 11-15 |
| Fair. Limited applicability |
| 16-20 |
| Good. Some applicability |
| 21-25 |
| Very Good. Substantial applicability |
| 25-30 |
| Excellent. Total applicability |
ASSISTANCE
Contact the State Procurement Office at 701-328-2773 for assistance in developing evaluation criteria and evaluating proposals.
AWARD NOTICE
After selecting the most advantageous proposal, send out a notice of award to all vendors that responded to the Participating Addendum. Association and vendor must wait for seven (7) days before executing the Participating Addendum
State Contract 344 Grant Writer Services Pool Proposal Evaluation Worksheet
Association Name:
Evaluator Name:
Date:
Vendor:
Technical Evaluation Criteria
| Maximum Possible Points |
| Score of Vendor Proposal |
| Comments on Vendor Proposal |
1. Vendor Solution Consider:
What is the quality of the proposed solution?
How well does the proposed solution meet the requirements stated in the scope of work?
2. Qualifications and Availability of Vendor Staff Consider:
What is the availability of vendor staff?
What are the qualifications of the vendor staff based upon vendor staff resumes and reference checks?
Cost Evaluation Price of Lowest Cost Proposal Price of Proposal Being Rated X Points Assigned to Cost = Awarded Points
3. Cost
Total
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .