524_Scoring_Notes__1_.pdf

PDF 121 KB Posted

Attached to
Competitive Selection OH|DOT52424-1
Contract number
DOT52424-1
Issued by
Ohio

About this file

This document is a detailed scoring notes sheet for contract evaluation, focusing on multiple technology consulting and solutions companies including CGI Technologies & Solutions Inc, Centric Consulting LLC, ETCH LTD, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Elasticsearch Inc, Synesis Partners LLC, Insight Global, and Mindhop, Inc. The scoring appears to be part of a comprehensive assessment process for a potential state or local government technology contract, with each company evaluated across six distinct criteria ranging from technical approach to federal grant experience.

The evaluation criteria assess vendors on aspects such as scalability, AI and machine learning capabilities, technical approach, and real-world implementation examples. Companies received ratings of "Meets", "Partially Meets", "Does Not Meet", or "Exceeds" across these categories. ETCH LTD notably performed exceptionally well, receiving "Exceeds" ratings in multiple areas, particularly highlighting their Move AI Feed and partnership. Conversely, companies like Elasticsearch Inc and Insight Global received multiple "Does Not Meet" ratings, primarily due to lack of technical detail, absence of AI/machine learning capabilities, and insufficient real-world examples. The scoring suggests a rigorous vendor selection process focused on comprehensive technical capabilities and proven experience.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

524-24 Scoring Notes

CGI TECHNOLOGIES & SOLUTIONS INC

1. Par�ally Meets – Proposed solu�on doesn’t seem feasible for scaling, too cloud provider specific.

2. Meets

3. Meets

4. Meets

5. Meets

6. Meets

CENTRIC CONSULTING LLC

1. Meets

2. Meets

3. Meets

4. Meets

5. Par�ally Meets – Federal Experience is limited. No real detail provided.

ETCH LTD

1. Exceeds – Greatly exceeded expecta�ons, Move AI Feed

2. Meets

3. Exceeds – Greatly exceeded expecta�ons, Move AI partnership

4. Exceeds – Greatly exceeded expecta�ons.

6. Exceeds – Greatly exceeded expecta�ons, many real-world examples included.

DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP

1. Does Not Meet – 12-month �meline.

2. Meets

3. Meets

4. Meets

Elas�csearch Inc

1. Does Not Meet – No technical approach or schedule located.

2. Par�ally Meets – Lacks adequate detail

3. Does Not Meet – No AI or Machine Learning located.

4. Par�ally Meets – Lacks adequate detail

5. Does Not Meet – No Federal Grant Experience located.

6. Does Not Meet – No real-world examples located in the response.

Synesis Partners LLC

2. Meets

3. Meets

4. Meets

5. Does Not Meet – No Federal Grant Experience located.

Insight Global

1. Par�ally Meets – Proposed solu�on doesn’t seem feasible for scaling. Overly complex.

2. Par�ally Meets – Lacks adequate detail

3. Does Not Meet – No AI or Machine Learning located.

4. Par�ally Meets – Lacks adequate detail

5. Par�ally Meets – Lacks adequate detail

6. Does Not Meet – No real-world examples located in the response.

Mindhop, Inc.

2. Meets

3. Meets

4. Meets

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .