524-24_Score_Sheet__1_.xlsx

30 KB Posted

Attached to
Competitive Selection OH|DOT52424-1
Contract number
DOT52424-1
Issued by
Ohio

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

The document is a technical evaluation score sheet for a state or local government contract, comparing proposals from multiple vendors including ETCH LTD, Mindhop, Inc., Centric Consulting LLC, CGI Technologies & Solutions Inc, Insight Global, Elasticsearch Inc, Deloitte Consulting LLP, and Synesis Partners LLC. The evaluation process involves a detailed scoring methodology across six key criteria, with a minimum technical score requirement of 710 points to qualify for further consideration.

The contract appears to be focused on technical services involving artificial intelligence, machine learning, data analytics, and project management, with an emphasis on experience with state Department of Transportation (DOT) integrations and federal grant project management. ETCH LTD submitted the lowest cost per quality point at $829.48, with a total submitted price of $771,415.00 and the highest technical score of 930 points. Vendors were evaluated on technical approach, project team capabilities, AI/ML experience, interagency data integration, federal grant project experience, and data analytics proficiency, with weightings ranging from 15-20% for each category.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
524-24_Bid_Document__1_.pdf PDF
524-24_SMART_Grant_Development_Cost_Etch__1___1_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
524_Scoring_Notes__1_.pdf PDF
ODOT_Contract_524-24_Signed_Amendment_2_Etch.pdf PDF
524-24_SMART_Grant_Software_Developer_Etch__1_.pdf PDF
524-24_SMART_Grant_Software_Developer_Supplement_A_-_State_IT_Policy_Standard_and_Service_Requirements_20220503_REV__1_.pdf PDF
ETCH_LTD_Contract_Amendment-Signed__1_.pdf PDF
Signature__7___1_.pdf PDF
524-24_SMART_Grant_Software_Developer_Affirmation_and_Disclosure_Etch__1_.pdf PDF
524-24_SMART_Grant_Software_Developer_Supplement_S_-_State_Information_Security_Privacy_and_Data_Handling_Requirements_2.0_Etch_.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ETCH LTD - 930

VendorETCH LTD
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightingDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
1Technical approach and schedule20200
2Project manager, team and availability20160
3Respondents experience with using Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning15150
4Respondents experience with State DOT or other interagency data / development integrations15150
5Respondents experience working on, managing, and reporting on Federal Grant Projects15120
6Respondents experience using data analytics to address real-world challenges15150
Section Subtotals0280650
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points280
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points650
Grand Total Score930

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 710 points?

YESxNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$771,415.00/Grand Total Techincal Score930
Cost Per Quality Point:$829.48
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Mindhop, Inc. - 800

VendorMindhop, Inc.
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightingDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
1Technical approach and schedule20160
2Project manager, team and availability20160
3Respondents experience with using Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning15120
4Respondents experience with State DOT or other interagency data / development integrations15120
5Respondents experience working on, managing, and reporting on Federal Grant Projects15120
6Respondents experience using data analytics to address real-world challenges15120
Section Subtotals08000
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points800
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score800

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 710 points?

YESxNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$994,725.00/Grand Total Techincal Score800
Cost Per Quality Point:$1,243.41
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

CENTRIC CONSULTING LLC - 770

VendorCENTRIC CONSULTING LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightingDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
1Technical approach and schedule20160
2Project manager, team and availability20160
3Respondents experience with using Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning15120
4Respondents experience with State DOT or other interagency data / development integrations15120
5Respondents experience working on, managing, and reporting on Federal Grant Projects1590
6Respondents experience using data analytics to address real-world challenges15120
Section Subtotals906800
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points90
Column Subtotal of Meets Points680
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score770

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 710 points?

YESxNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$985,490.00/Grand Total Techincal Score770
Cost Per Quality Point:$1,279.86
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

CGI TECHNOLOGIES - 760

VendorCGI TECHNOLOGIES & SOLUTIONS INC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightingDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
1Technical approach and schedule20120
2Project manager, team and availability20160
3Respondents experience with using Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning15120
4Respondents experience with State DOT or other interagency data / development integrations15120
5Respondents experience working on, managing, and reporting on Federal Grant Projects15120
6Respondents experience using data analytics to address real-world challenges15120
Section Subtotals1206400
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points120
Column Subtotal of Meets Points640
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score760

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 710 points?

YESxNo
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price$1,296,000.00/Grand Total Techincal Score760
Cost Per Quality Point:$1,705.26
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Insight Global - 420

VendorInsight Global
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightingDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
1Technical approach and schedule20120
2Project manager, team and availability20120
3Respondents experience with using Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning150
4Respondents experience with State DOT or other interagency data / development integrations1590
5Respondents experience working on, managing, and reporting on Federal Grant Projects1590
6Respondents experience using data analytics to address real-world challenges150
Section Subtotals42000
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points420
Column Subtotal of Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score420

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 710 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score420
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Elasticsearch Inc - 210

VendorElasticsearch Inc
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightingDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
1Technical approach and schedule200
2Project manager, team and availability20120
3Respondents experience with using Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning150
4Respondents experience with State DOT or other interagency data / development integrations1590
5Respondents experience working on, managing, and reporting on Federal Grant Projects150
6Respondents experience using data analytics to address real-world challenges150
Section Subtotals21000
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points210
Column Subtotal of Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score210

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 710 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score210
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP - 640

VendorDELOITTE CONSULTING LLP
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightingDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
1Technical approach and schedule200
2Project manager, team and availability20160
3Respondents experience with using Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning15120
4Respondents experience with State DOT or other interagency data / development integrations15120
5Respondents experience working on, managing, and reporting on Federal Grant Projects15120
6Respondents experience using data analytics to address real-world challenges15120
Section Subtotals06400
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points640
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score640

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 710 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score640
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

Synesis Partners LLC - 680

VendorSynesis Partners LLC
Item #Evaluation CriteriaWeightingDoesn't Meet 0Partially Meets 6Meets 8Exceeds 10
WORK REQUIREMENTS
1Technical approach and schedule20160
2Project manager, team and availability20160
3Respondents experience with using Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning15120
4Respondents experience with State DOT or other interagency data / development integrations15120
5Respondents experience working on, managing, and reporting on Federal Grant Projects150
6Respondents experience using data analytics to address real-world challenges15120
Section Subtotals06800
Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points0
Column Subtotal of Meets Points680
Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points0
Grand Total Score680

Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 710 points?

YESNoX
(If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.)
Cost Per Quality Point
Vendors Total Submitted Price/Grand Total Techincal Score680
Cost Per Quality Point:$0.00
The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .