Sol 47PH0821R0001 Amendment 2.pdf

PDF 347 KB Posted

Attached to
Earle Cabell Federal Building Elevator Modernization Project Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
47PH0821R0001
Issued by
General Services Administration Public Buildings Service

About this file

This document contains a solicitation for an elevator modernization project at the Earle Cabell Federal Building in Dallas, Texas. The General Services Administration Public Buildings Service is seeking proposals for modernizing thirteen elevators in two groups of six passenger elevators and one service elevator. The project must meet current ASME and accessibility standards. The estimated contract value is between $5-10 million. Proposals are due by February 23, 2021. The contractor will be selected using best value tradeoff procedures and non-price factors will be more important than price. The contract type will be firm-fixed-price. The performance period is 775 calendar days from notice to proceed. The North American Industry Classification code is 238920 and the size standard is $16.5 million.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Earle Cabell Federal Building Elevator Modernization Project, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol 47PH0821R0001 Amendment 5.pdf PDF
SOL 47PH0821R0001 Amendment 4.pdf PDF
SOL 47PH0821R0001 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
SOL 47PH0821R0001 Amendment 1.pdf PDF
47PH0821R0001.pdf PDF
62288 Attachment 3 - Bid Schedule 2020-12-21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Construction Contract for the Earle Cabell Elevator Modernization Project, Earle Cabell Federal Building, Dallas, TX

Solicitation 47PH0821R0001 Amendment 2

PROPOSAL DUE DATE REMAINS THE SAME, FEBRUARY 23, 2021 AT 2:00 P.M. CENTRAL TIME.

See following pages for description.

GSA, PBS, Acquisition Management Division (7PQA) 819 Taylor Street, Room 12B01 Fort Worth, TX 76102

47PH0821R0001

62288

1 6

01/29/2021

Solicitation 47PH0821R0001 Amendment 2 Earle Cabell Elevator Modernization Project

Amendment No. 2 Construction Contract for the Earle Cabell Elevator Modernization Project Earle Cabell Federal Building Dallas, Texas

This amendment is issued to provide the following:

1) The Past Performance Questionnaire (4 pages) was not included in the original solicitation published on January 13, 2021. Attached with Amendment 2 is the questionnaire which must be submitted with the Technical Proposal.

REMINDER: Proposal Due date remains the same, February 23, 2021 at 2:00 P.M. Central Time. Only electronic submissions are allowed, and all submissions are to be emailed to Jason Gerloff at: Jason.gerloff@gsa.gov.

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

1) Question: I attended this week's site visit and am inquiring if there will be another site visit schedule so that I can bring my subcontractors to look things over.

Answer: No additional site walks will be scheduled.

2) Question: Were pictures allowed on the site walks?

Answer: Yes.

Earle Cabell Elevator Modernization Project, Dallas, Texas: Solicitation Number: 47PH0821R0001 Page 1

FACTOR D: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 47PH0821R0001

OFFERORS NAME: ________________________________________________

Reference Contacted:

Name & Title: ____________________________________________________________

Company: __________________________ Telephone No.: _________________

Title of Project:_________________________________ Email:________________________

Building location of contractor’s performance: ______________________________

Start/End date of Contract Performance: ___________________________________

Estimated price/cost for services: _________________________________________

Construction period (# of calendar days): ___________________

EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions –

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

Earle Cabell Elevator Modernization Project, Dallas, Texas: Solicitation Number: 47PH0821R0001 Page 2

Past Performance Evaluation

Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s technical approach to your project?

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Questions 2. Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to stay on schedule and complete the project on time?

Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Questions 3. Timeliness Did the contractor provide a work schedule for this project?

Good

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Schedule

Was schedule reasonable

Earle Cabell Elevator Modernization Project, Dallas, Texas: Solicitation Number: 47PH0821R0001 Page 3

Question 4. Preventive Maintenance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s Preventive Maintenance Program?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Quality of Maintenance

Question 5. Preventive Maintenance

Did contractor provide operation and maintenance services after the completion of your project?

If so, how long and how would you rate their performance?

Maintenance

Earle Cabell Elevator Modernization Project, Dallas, Texas: Solicitation Number: 47PH0821R0001 Page 4

Question 6. Warranty

Was any equipment under the service maintenance program identified as a warranty item?

If so, did they respond in a timely manner?7

Warranty

Comments, If any.

Question 7. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

Question 8. If you had a choice, would you work with the Contractor again? Why or Why not?

General Comments: Yes or No:

SF 30 amend 2
Amendment No 2 DRAFT
EXPERIENCE AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .