47PG1023R1072 Technical Proposal Forms 20230906.pdf

For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!

http://www.adobe.com/go/reader

Project Location Project Name

Client Name Client Point of Contact Client Phone Number Client Address

Award Value

Start Date

Final Value Project Method Project Role Contract Type

1. Project Summary

Contract Number

2. Describe your role in the project.

3. Describe any problems encountered and corrective actions taken.

4. Describe the amount and types of work self-performed and work performed by subcontractors.

Contractor Project Experience

EndDate

Contractor Name: Project Submission Number:

5. Select Trade(s) Applying to Project

Project Location Project Name

Client Name Client Point of Contact Client Phone Number Client Address

Award Value

Start Date

Final Value Project Method Project Role Contract Type

1. Project Summary

Contract Number

2. Describe your role in the project.

3. Describe any problems encountered and corrective actions taken.

4. Describe the amount and types of work self-performed and work performed by subcontractors.

Contractor Project Experience

EndDate

Contractor Name: Project Submission Number:

5. Select Trade(s) Applying to Project

Dropdown1: [1]

Contractor Name:

Project Titlea:

Project Locationa:

Project Start Datea:

Project End Datea:

Client Agency Namea:

a:

Client Phonea:

Client Addressa:

Construction Cost at Awarda: $

Final Construction Costa: $

Contract Numbera:

Project Methoda: [Select One]

Project Rolea: [Select One]

Contract Typea: [Select One]

Project Summarya:

Similara:

Qualitya:

In Housea:

Trade 7a: Painting

Trade 8a: Masonry

Trade 5a: Flooring

Trade 6a: Asphalt/Concrete

Trade 3a: Plumbing

Trade 4a: HVAC

Trade 1a: Electrical

Trade 2a: Carpentry

Box 7a: Off

Box 8a: Off

Box 5a: Off

Box 6a: Off

Box 3a: Off

Box 4a: Off

Box 1a: Off

Box 2a: Off

Project Summary:

Construction Cost at Award: $

Project Location:

Client Agency Name:

Box 1: Off

Trade 1: Electrical

Trade 2: Carpentry

Trade 3: Plumbing

Trade 4: HVAC

Trade 5: Flooring

Trade 6: Asphalt/Concrete

Box 2: Off

Box 3: Off

Box 4: Off

Box 5: Off

Box 6: Off

Box 7: Off

Box 8: Off

Trade 7: Painting

Trade 8: Masonry

Similar:

Quality:

In House:

Final Construction Cost: $

Contract Number:

Project Method: [Select One]

Project Role: [Select One]

Contract Type: [Select One]

Project Title:

Client Address:

Client Phone:

Client Point of Contact:

Project Start Date:

Project End Date:

Contractor Name1:

Dropdown11: [2]

MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL APPROACH - CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

The purpose of this form is for the offeror to describe how they intend to successfully manage contract requirements. To further illustrate plans, submissions can include past experience meeting individual requirements. The plan shall address each of the following components:

1. Compliance with requirement to provide a full-time on-site superintendent for the duration of projects including contingency plan for replacement superintendent as required.

2. Contractor approach, including specific methods, tools, and technology systems used for completing projects on schedule with high quality.

3. Ability to respond timely, responsibly (including observation of site conditions), and competitively to 25% of the task order opportunities.

4. Methods for controlling costs in a volatile economic climate.

MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL APPROACH - CONTRACT COMPLIANCE

The purpose of this form is for the offeror to describe how they intend to maintain safe work environments, utilize sustainable construction practices, and meet regulatory security requirements. To further illustrate plans, submissions can include past experience meeting individual requirements. The plan shall address each of the following components:

1. The firm’s safety program with emphasis on how it will be tailored to each individual project. The offeror should identify the individual(s) within the firm who manage and administer the safety program.

2. Special mechanisms or plans that show experience and an understanding of sustainable design and construction processes including green products, waste management, and bio-based reporting.

3. Compliance with procedures for marking, handling, safeguarding, disseminating, and destroying Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) information.

4. Organizational procedures and policies for efficiently managing employee and subcontractor background investigations and accountability of Personal Identity Verification (PIV) credentials.

Managment Narrative:

Compliance Narrative:

U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number: UEI Number:

Contact Name:

Email Address: Contact Phone Number:

2. GENERAL WORK INFORMATION

Work performed as:☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub Contractor ☐ Joint Venture ☐ Other (Please explain):

Percent (%) of project work performed:

If a subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type:☐ Firm Fixed Price ☐ Cost Reimbursement ☐ Other (Please explain) Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Original Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Schedule Change:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

How is this project similiar? (Provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

Use the following adjective ratings and definitions in your evaluation of the Contractor’s performance.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

CLIENT INFORMATION

Client:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Describe the client’s role in the project:

Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

Client’s Signature:

Instructions: Please select the adjective rating and the Yes/No reply that best reflects your evaluation of the contractor’s performance.

1. QUALITY:

(a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts.

(b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance).

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

Rating

(a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.)

(b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication).

(c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(d) Overall customer satisfaction. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

(a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(c) Government Property Control. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(e) Utilization of Small Business concerns. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes.

(h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program). ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

(a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.

(c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, or a CMc/CMc at Risk Contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns).

(d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? (If no, please explain in comment section below.)

☐ Yes ☐ No

(e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.)

(f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? (If yes, please explain in the comment section

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

(a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.).

(b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

7. SUSTAINABILITY

Were sustainability methods, processes, or materials incorporated into the project? (If yes, please explain in the comments section below.) ☐ Yes ☐ No

8. GENERAL

(a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

(b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (If there were specific issues, please explain in the comments sections below.) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain in the comments section below.) ☐ Yes ☐ No

(d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

COMMENTS SECTION

Please provide additional information below, and attach additional pages if necessary.

Please provide responses to the above questions (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Also please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

Describe the clients role in the project:

Dropdown4: [Select One]

UEI:

Contact Phone:

Work Perf:

Sub:

Number:

TO:

Title:

Location:

Award Date_af_date:

Comp Date_af_date:

Act comp date_af_date:

Final Price:

Org Price:

Dropdown1: [Select One]

Dropdown2: [Select One]

Dropdown3: [Select One]

Dropdown5: [Select One]

Dropdown6: [Select One]

Dropdown7: [Select One]

Dropdown8: [Select One]

Dropdown9: [Select One]

Dropdown10: [Select One]

Dropdown11: [Select One]

Dropdown12: [Select One]

Dropdown13: [Select One]

Dropdown14: [Select One]

Dropdown15: [Select One]

Dropdown16: [Select One]

Dropdown17: [Select One]

Dropdown18: [Select One]

Dropdown19: [Select One]

Dropdown20: [Select One]

Dropdown21: [Select One]

Dropdown22: [Select One]

Dropdown23: [Select One]

Name:

Add:

Phone:

Contact:

Email:

CL Phone:

Contact CL:

Email CL:

Diff:

Sch Change:

Dropdown24: [Select One]

Dropdown25: [Select One]

Dropdown26: [Select One]

Prime: Off

Sub1: Off

JV: Off

Other: Off

Sim:

Comments:

CL Name:

Client:

FFP: Off

Cost: Off

Othe: Off

Oth:

Oth cont:

Date comp_af_date:

1: Off

2: Off

3: Off

4: Off

5: Off

6: Off

7: Off

8: Off

9: Off

10: Off

U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number: UEI Number:

Contact Name:

Email Address: Contact Phone Number:

2. GENERAL WORK INFORMATION

Work performed as:☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub Contractor ☐ Joint Venture ☐ Other (Please explain):

Percent (%) of project work performed:

If a subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type:☐ Firm Fixed Price ☐ Cost Reimbursement ☐ Other (Please explain) Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Original Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Schedule Change:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

How is this project similiar? (Provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

Use the following adjective ratings and definitions in your evaluation of the Contractor’s performance.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. A fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

CLIENT INFORMATION

Client:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Describe the client’s role in the project:

Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

Client’s Signature:

Instructions: Please select the adjective rating and the Yes/No reply that best reflects your evaluation of the contractor’s performance.

1. QUALITY:

(a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts.

(b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance).

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

(a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.)

(b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication).

(c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(d) Overall customer satisfaction. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

(a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(c) Government Property Control. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(e) Utilization of Small Business concerns. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes.

(h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program). ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

(a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.

(c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, or a CMc/CMc at Risk Contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns).

(d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? (If no, please explain in comment section

(e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.)

(f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? (If yes, please explain in the comment section

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

(a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.).

(b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

7. SUSTAINABILITY

Were sustainability methods, processes, or materials incorporated into the project? (If yes, please explain in the comments section below.) ☐ Yes ☐ No

8. GENERAL

(a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

(b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (If there were specific issues, please explain in the comments sections below.) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

(c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain in the comments section below.) ☐ Yes ☐ No

(d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

COMMENTS SECTION

Please provide additional information below, and attach additional pages if necessary.

Please provide responses to the above questions (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Also please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

Describe the clients role in the project:

Dropdown4: [Select One]

UEI:

Contact Phone:

Work Perf:

Sub:

Number:

TO:

Title:

Location:

Award Date_af_date:

Comp Date_af_date:

Act comp date_af_date:

Final Price:

Org Price:

Dropdown1: [Select One]

Dropdown2: [Select One]

Dropdown3: [Select One]

Dropdown5: [Select One]

Dropdown6: [Select One]

Dropdown7: [Select One]

Dropdown8: [Select One]

Dropdown9: [Select One]

Dropdown10: [Select One]

Dropdown11: [Select One]

Dropdown12: [Select One]

Dropdown13: [Select One]

Dropdown14: [Select One]

Dropdown15: [Select One]

Dropdown16: [Select One]

Dropdown17: [Select One]

Dropdown18: [Select One]

Dropdown19: [Select One]

Dropdown20: [Select One]

Dropdown21: [Select One]

Dropdown22: [Select One]

Dropdown23: [Select One]

Name:

Add:

Phone:

Contact:

Email:

CL Phone:

Contact CL:

Email CL:

Diff:

Sch Change:

Dropdown24: [Select One]

Dropdown25: [Select One]

Dropdown26: [Select One]

Prime: Off

Sub1: Off

JV: Off

Other: Off

Sim:

Comments:

CL Name:

Client:

FFP: Off

Cost: Off

Othe: Off

Oth:

Oth cont:

Date comp_af_date:

1: Off

2: Off

3: Off

4: Off

5: Off

6: Off

7: Off

8: Off

9: Off

10: Off

Qualification of Key Personnel- Contract Manager

The purpose of this form is to provide written qualifications and experience for the Contract Manager who will be assigned to this contract. Qualifications are based on experience, education, and expertise. The Contract Manager is the central point of contact tasked with serving as an overall manager of ongoing projects responsible to GSA for scheduling and coordinating all project and contract deliverables. The primary Contract Manager must be an individual with administrative oversight responsibilities.

They can be based in the firm’s home office or on-site.

Name Current Position

Expected Role on Contact

Years with Company Years Performing Similar Work

Education & Certifications (list all relative degrees, certificates and professional registrations and licenses):

Professional Qualifications & Experience

Provide three (3) similar projects performed within the last three (3) years. At a minimum, include role performed, contract title, project summary, completion date, and contract dollar value.

Project 1

Project 2

Project 3

Qualification of Key Personnel- Site Superintendent The purpose of this form is to provide written qualifications and experience for the Site Superintendent who will be assigned to this contract. Qualifications are based on experience, education, and expertise. The Superintendent leads and manages on-site construction, coordinates and oversees all work on site, and ensures quality standards are met. They ensure the project is on schedule, within budget, and conforms to plans and specifications. The Superintendent remains on-site at all times during performance of the project.

Name Current Position

Expected Role on Contact

Years with Company Years Performing Similar Work

Education & Certifications (list all relative degrees, certificates and professional registrations and licenses):

Professional Qualifications & Experience

Provide three (3) similar projects performed within the last three (3) years. At a minimum, include role performed, contract title, project summary, completion date, and contract dollar value.

Project 1

Project 2

Project 3

Name1:

Position1:

Role1:

Years1:

Work1:

Education1:

Qual1:

Project 11:

Project 21:

Project 31:

Name:

Position:

Role:

Years:

Work:

Education:

Qual:

Project 1:

Project 2:

Project 3: