4 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 107 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Narcotics Extraction and Transportation Hazardous Materials Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70B03C20Q00000106
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 2 Attachment1 CLIN Pricing Template RFQ.pdf | ||
| 5 Wage Determinations.pdf | ||
| 3 Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| 1 Clauses and Provisions.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Company Being Evaluated: ___________________________________________________________________________
Contract/Order Number: _____________________________________________________________________________
Name and Title of Individual Performing Evaluation: ______________________________________________
Office: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Phone Number: ___________________________________ Email: _______________________________________________
Project Information: _____________________________________________________________________________________
Type of Contract (circle or bold one): Firm‐Fixed‐Price, Labor Hours, Time & Materials, Other
Original Dollar Value of Contract: ___________________________________________________________________
Brief Description or Work Performed: _____________________________________________________________
Evaluation (Answers may be indicated with a or ) :
1 = Unsatisfactory 2 = Marginal 3 = Satisfactory 4 = Very Good 5 = Exceptional
Unsatisfactory
Overall performance requires significant Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Marginal Performance was less than satisfactory and could have stood improvement.
Satisfactory
Performance met customer expectations or contract requirements.
Very Good
| Performance | fully | exceeded | many | of | the | contract | requirements. | Offeror’s | performance | has | |
| resulted | in | a | high | level | of | efficiency | and | productivity | and | quality. |
Exceptional
| Performance | significantly | exceeded | most | or | all | contract | requirements. | Furthermore, | the | offeror | ||
| provided | significant, | unusual, | unique, | or | worthwhile | features | or | benefits | and | performance | was | of |
| the | highest | quality. |
| Criteria | 5 4 3 | 2 1 | ||||||||
| 1. | Quality | of | Product | or | Service | – | Compliance | with | the | |
| Statement | of | Work | and | other | Contract | Requirements. |
| 2. | Schedule | Compliance | – | Timeliness | of | the | Contractor | |
| Against | the | Schedule | of | Deliverables. |
| 3. | Cost | Control | – | Did | contractor | stay | within | their | original | |
| price | proposal? |
| 4. | Business | Relations | – | Responsiveness | to | issues, | |
| inquiries, | and | problems. |
| 5. | Management | of | Key | Personnel | ‐ | Ability | to | manage | |||
| employees | and | schedule | work | to | complete | project | in | a | |||
| timely | manner. |
Would you hire this firm again?
Overall Assessment of Contractor Performance:
Comments/Complaints:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .