36C24920R0019-004.docx

DOCX document Posted

Attached to
Urology Cryoblation Services 3/1/20 - 2/28/21 Base Plus 4 Ordering Periods
Solicitation number
36C24920R0019
Issued by

About this file

36C24920R0019 Attachment 4-Past Performance Survey.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24920R0019-001.doc DOC document
36C24920R0019-000.docx DOCX document
36C24920R0019-002.docx DOCX document
36C24920R0019-003.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

36C24920R0019 - ATTACHMENT 4 PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

AS-NEEDED CRYOABLATION SERVICES

REFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS: The Department of Veterans Affairs is seeking offerors for award of a VA contract for as needed cryoablation services for a base year plus four option years. You have been identified as a reference and your comments would be appreciated. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about Offeror’s past performance is prohibited. Survey should be completed by evaluator and submitted no later than December 23, 2019 @ 3:00 p.m. CT via email directly to alyson.allman@va.gov.

NOTE: Incomplete or unsigned surveys will not be considered.

Company being evaluated:_______________________________________________ Period of Performance:__ What was the average monthly volume of the services provided? (Number of cases per month? Average number of hours per case?) __ ____________________________________ Name and title/position of evaluator:

Contact telephone number:

Contact e-mail address:

Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation. If the rating is other than Fully Acceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.

S = Superior Performance

V = Very Good with very few issues

F = Fully Acceptable/Good

M = Marginally Acceptable

U = Unacceptable Performance

Please rate and provide information/comments for the following:
Circle/indicate selection
Q1. Rate how well the contractor complies with requirements and/or expectations?
S V F M U
Q2. Rate contractor’s knowledge and expertise in providing cryoablation services.
S V F M U
Q3. Rate this contractor’s technicians.
S V F M U
Q4. Rate the level of access to the contractor’s personnel. (i.e. Did they respond in a timely manner? Did they meet the requirements of being available and responding as according to the contract?)
S V F M U
Q5. Rate overall ease of contractor’s scheduling process.
S V F M U
Q6. Rate how well contractor protects the privacy of patients.
S V F M U

Q9. Would you award another contract to the firm being evaluated? If no, please explain:

Yes No

Additional Remarks: Please use this space to indicate anything else you would like to say about the contractor being referenced or to list anything you especially liked or disliked about this contractor:

Signature of Evaluator
Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .