36C24618Q9331-0002001.docx

SECTION B - CONTINUATION OF SF 1449 BLOCKS

B.1 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

Paragraph 2. Removed – See incorporated provision VAAR 852.232-72 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PAYMENT REQUESTS (NOV 2012) at C.8 and;

C.10 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 2018) incorporated provisions 52.232-33 PAYMENT BY ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER – SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT—System for Award Management (Jul 2013) (31 U.S.C. 3332), and 52.232-34 PAYMENT BY ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER – THER THAN SYSTEMS FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT.

B.3 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT FOR VALAET PARKING

Paragraph 4a. Remove “Ask the driver for an appointment letter or VA Patient Identification card, and the estimated time of departure.”

Paragraph 4c. Add “The Contractor shall provide adequate staffing of Valet Parking Service attendant(s) to staff the valet and provide assisted parking operations. The Valet Parking Service shall be provided efficiently with all vehicles parked and retrieved within 10 minutes after arrival at the valet booth. The 10-minute period upon arrival shall begin when the vehicle is queued in the staging area, and shall end when the Contractor employee has processed and driven the vehicle from queueing area. The 10-minute period for retrieval shall begin when the patient queues in the retrieval line and shall end when the patient is presented with their vehicle in idle. The staging area is defined as the area just beyond the speed hump.”

Paragraph 4e. Add “The Contractor shall manage and monitor traffic, to provide direction for alternate parking and shuttle service, in the event the valet parking area is full.”

Paragraph 4g. Add “The Contractor employees shall only accept valet vehicles for parking between 7:00am and 4:00pm.”

Paragraph 5. Renumbered paragraphs 5f. through 5i. and;

Added the following requirement: “5h. The Contractor shall provide evidence of employee 5 panel drug testing, a criminal background check, and DMV driving history review for each employee. It is also expected that employee random drug tests are performed and the DMV driving history is reviewed annually. A copy of the results of this annual review shall be provided to the COR.”

Paragraph 12. Removed – Background Screening; this information is located in Section B.4 Special Contract Requirements at subheading “Security Requirements for Contractor Employees.”

Paragraph 13. Remove “Employee is to contact his dispatcher/ supervisor via the radio system,” and add “Contractor employee is to contact the Contractor Supervisor.”

B.4 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

Removed subheading “Billing and Payment” with Invoice Instructions - See incorporated provision VAAR 852.232-72 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PAYMENT REQUESTS (NOV 2012) at C.8; specific invoice information required is contained within at VAAR 852.232-72(d).

SECTION C - CONTRACT CLAUSES

C.3 52.217-9 OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT (MAR 2000); update the total duration from one (1) year to:

(c) The total duration of this contract, including the exercise of any options under this clause, shall not exceed five (5) years and six (6) months.

C.10 52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR EXECUTIVE ORDERS—COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 2018) Removed [X] from:

[] (14)(i) 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 644), and;

Included [X] at:

[] (21) 52.219-27, Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside (NOV 2011) (15 U.S.C. 657f).

SECTION E - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

E.1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

QUOTE PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS: (c) Remove Statement of Work and revise with PWS

c. Price Submission: Submit Original Quote

i. Price submission shall be submitted and labeled in accordance with Section E. 1, Paragraph (a) (1). Alternate price schedules will not be considered.

ii. Total Price will be evaluated including all options

AWARD BASIS AND EVALUATION METHOD: The Government will award a firm fixed priced contract to the responsible offeror whose offer, conforming to the requirements in this request for quote, will be most advantageous to the Government. This is a competitive selection where Past Performance is significantly more important than Technical, and Past Performance is significantly more important than Price. By submission of its quote, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The government shall verify that offerors are a verified Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) vendors at time of quote submission and prior to receiving award.

PAST PERFORMANCE:

a. Using the Past Performance Questionnaires, the CO shall seek relevant past performance information on Valet Parking Services based on: (1) the references provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. Relevant past performance includes performance of efforts involving Valet Parking Services that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity to the effort described in this solicitation. The government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receive a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the government to assess the offeror’s ability to perform the effort described in the solicitation, based on the offeror’s demonstrated present and past performance. Past performance evaluated will be the past performance of the prime contractor (Company submitting the quote). The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence as defined in Table 1 below. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will/will not be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating “Unknown Confidence”, meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Offeror’s who are considering “Teaming Agreements”, both companies shall be verified SDVOSB.

b. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

c. If the lowest priced evaluated offer is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance rating and is determined to be responsible, that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

d. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated.

e. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the proposal preparation instructions to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. The Following will be used to rate the past performance of each offeror:

TABLE 1

Past Performance

TECHNICAL:

a. The offeror shall provide evidence that the offeror possesses a minimum of three (3) years of experience relevant to the level of work in the PWS.

b. The offeror shall provide a detailed operational plan to include staffing approach. The operational plan shall address how the offeror will meet the requirements of the PWS. The Technical Rating shall be conducted and rated either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” in accordance with Table 2.

TABLE 2

Technical Ratings

PRICE:

a. Initially offers shall be ranked according to price, including option prices. An offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Pricing Schedule by the unit price for each item to confirm the extended amount for each.