36C24220Q0367-006.docx
DOCX document Posted
- Attached to
- Z1DA--528-20-116 ROOF REPLACEMENT BUILDING 2
- Solicitation number
- 36C24220Q0367
About this file
36C24220Q0367 Roof Replacement BLDG 2 Evaluation Questions.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24220Q0367-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24220Q0367-003.pdf | ||
| 36C24220Q0367-002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24220Q0367-004.zip | ZIP file | |
| 36C24220Q0367-005.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Roof Replacement BLDG 2 Project 528-20-116 Contractor Evaluation Questions
| MARGINAL |
| Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weakness which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high. |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance, Risk of unsuccessful performance is moderate. |
| GOOD |
| Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strength which outweigh any weakness. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low. |
Questions below will be rated using the scale set out above. Questions are listed in order of importance. Responses are limited to one page, double spaced using Calibri 12 font.
1. State whether key personnel responsible for installing new roofing material are prime or subcontracted employees.
2. Provide three references for similar projects in the past 5 years installing ‘EPDM’ roofing material. Include a point of contract, phone number and contract number, if applicable.
3. Material warranty period.
This procurement will be utilizing a tradeoff process. When taking these three factors into consideration, they are more important than price. However, price remains an important factor. In the event of a tie, selection will be made by the lowest price. Scoring will be based on an adjectival assessment by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The COR will be the sole evaluator.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .