36C10G18Q0188-006.docx

DOCX document 20 KB Posted

Attached to
NX EQ - Warming Cabinets
Solicitation number
36C10G18Q0188
Issued by

About this file

36C10G18Q0188 ATTACHMENT F - WARMING CABINETS - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C10G18Q0188-00001003.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0188-00001000.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0188-00001004.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0188-00001001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C10G18Q0188-00001002.pdf PDF
36C10G18Q0188-000.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0188-007.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C10G18Q0188-001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C10G18Q0188-002.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0188-005.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0188-003.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0188-004.docx DOCX document
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT F – WARMING CABINETS

PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO and DELIVERY/TASK ORDER].

Past Performance Questionnaire

Offeror’s Name: ______________________________________________________________

Solicitation: Non-expendable Equipment – Warming Cabinets 36C10G-18-Q-0188

Name of Person Completing the Evaluation: _______________________________________ Telephone: _____________________E-Mail: ______________________________________ Title_____________________ Company/Organization: _______________________________ Award Value: $____________________ Name of Commodity/Service____________________ Date Awarded_____________________

Please rate the Offeror in each of the following areas. Note there is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation.

· Not Applicable – N/A

· Marginal (M) Performance did not meet some contractual requirements

· Acceptable (A) Performance that meets the minimum contract performance standard or requirement

· Good (G) Performance that meets and occasionally exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement

· Outstanding (O) Performance that almost always exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement

1. Quality of Performance:
N/A
M
A
G
O

Compliance with contract requirements, use of appropriate and helpful staff, and expertise in the accreditation of medical laboratories as a deemed organization.

2. Timeliness of Performance:
N/A
M
A
G
O

The Offeror’s ability to meet milestones and delivery schedules.

3. Price/Price Control:
N/A
M
A
G
O

The Offeror’s ability to control prices claims; change order issues.

4. Customer Satisfaction
N/A
M
A
G
O

The Offeror’s commitment to customer satisfaction and their cooperative, reasonable businesslike behavior. This includes effective management, responsiveness to contract requirements, honesty and integrity, prompt notification of problems, flexible and proactive qualities and effective subcontract selection and management.

5. Have you issued a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments or other letters directing the correction of a performance problem in the past 3 years? [ ] YES [ ] NO If yes, please explain.

6. Have you terminated this Contractor for default within the past 3 years, or are there any pending termination actions? [ ] YES [ ] NO If yes, please explain.

7. Based on the Offeror’s overall performance, would you award them another contract?

[ ] YES [ ] NO If no, please explain.

8. Have you discussed any adverse past performance problems with the Offeror and given them an opportunity to comment? [ ] YES [ ] NO Please explain

Offeror Evaluation:

Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above)
Category
Description
Quality of Service
In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence:

Comment from Reference: _______________________

Cost Control
Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation:
Timeliness of Performance
Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule:
Business Relations
Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems:
YES NO
Overall Satisfaction
Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again?

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Past Performance Questionnaire AS AN ATTACHMENT via e-mail to Tonya W. Purce at tonya.pruce@va.gov and Beth Davis beth.davis2@va.gov in PDF format. The subject line of the email must read: RFQ 3610G18Q0188 - NX EQ Warming Cabinets Past Performance Questionnaire in order for the email to be successfully transmitted and received. Please e-mail the completed questionnaire by 4:00PM ESDST on Wednesday, June 13, 2018.

File details come from the government source that posted it.