RFI Responses 30 - 33.pdf

The purpose of this modification is to provide RFI responses 30 ‐ 33 .

36C10F21R0041 RFI RESPONSE SHEET

RFI NUMBER RFI RESPONSE

For Section E, there is an (s) indicated after a number of positions. Does this indicate that more than one resume is requested or is more desirable? Secondly if two are provided, will both be evaluated equally or will only the best (or weakest) resume be scored?

This acknowledges that an offeror’s team may include more than one key person in a particular discipline. The government takes no position on desirability of having more than one key person in each discipline and makes no presumption that this will make a team stronger or weaker and will evaluate each situation based its merits. If two or more resumes are provided with substantially different knowledge and experience levels, it may pull an evaluation down or up depending on the weakness or strength of the experienced/qualified proposed key person.

Will a government (USACE/DoD) Healthcare project be considered equivalent to VA in scoring Section F?

Projects will be scored on the merits of their demonstration of capability to perform similar work to that of the AE IDIQ Tasks listed in the presolicitation. All other things being equal, a VA project may be scored higher for the purposes of evaluating

Section F.

Please confirm that you want to see 5 projects in Section F instead of the usual 10 projects allowed. If yes, are there any requirements around the Past Performance examples (up to 10) provided in Section H, Factor 3 Past

There is no requirement to submit more than five projects in either section. Section F, however, is limited to only 5.

Performance? These will not align to the 5 projects in Section F.

Will the government consider an extension for the deadline of this submission?

No. The SF 330 packages are due September 7, 2021 at 4 PM

Central Time.