35942 EvaluationScoreMatrix for ITA.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 70 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CA/CEI services for 21737, located on OR6
- Solicitation number
- S-73000-00009526
- Issued by
- Tillamook County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Score Matrix for a state and local contract opportunity issued by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for Construction Administration/Construction Engineering and Inspection (CA/CEI) services for the OR6: Devils Lake Fork Wilson River Bridge project located in Clatsop County and the City of Astoria. The project involves removing deteriorated coating material, applying ODOT-approved coating materials, and rivet and/or bolt replacement. The CA/CEI services will include tasks such as project management, construction contract administration, construction monitoring and inspection, and project closeout. The work order contract is anticipated to start in May 2024 and be completed by September 2026. ODOT has assigned a 3% Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation goal for this work order contract.
The payment method for the CA/CEI services will be determined by ODOT and may include a combination of cost-plus-fixed-fee, fixed price, time and materials, and price per unit. ODOT anticipates the construction budget for this project will not exceed $6,835,100. The work order contract will include Federal funding, and the selected consultant must comply with the DBE requirements outlined in the Price Agreement Exhibit E. ODOT reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to cancel the Mini-RFP at any time if doing so would be in the public interest.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Mini RFP ORBuys 73000 00009526 35942 OR 6 CACEI Bridge K21737 Posted_.docm | DOCM document | |
| 5760 Att E - Responsibility Inquiry~1.doc | DOC document | |
| Mini RFP 73000-00009526 35942 Att A Cover Sheet (1).doc | DOC document | |
| STIP 21737 SnapShot.pdf | ||
| 73000-00009526 35942 OR 6 CA_CEI ITA (4).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Proposal Detail Scores
| RFP Number: 73000-00009526 (35942) Project Name: CA/CEI OR 6 Wilson River Bridge________ | |||||||
| SOP SCORE DETAILS | |||||||
| Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores | Enter actual number of evaluators: | 3 | |||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||
| Maximum | Anita | Fred | Troy | ||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | ||
| Dowl |
Administrator: Scoring deductions, if any, are provided by OPO after eval committee has completed SOP evaluation and scoring.
| Enter scoring deduction as percentage; i.e., "2%". (See Required Items section of RFP.) | 2.2.1 | Capacity | 50 | 40 | 50 | 45 | |||
| 2.2.2 | Expererince | 50 | 35 | 35 | 45 | ||||
| 2.2.3 | Key Staff | 30 | 25 | 30 | 30 | ||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | ||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | ||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | ||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | ||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | ||||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | |||||||
| Total | 130 | 100 | 115 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 100 | 115 | 120 | 0 | 0 |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | ||||||
| Expererince | 50 | ||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | ||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | |||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Firm Name | 30 | ||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 12 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 13 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 14 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 15 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 16 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 17 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 18 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Capacity | 50 | |||||||
| Expererince | 50 | |||||||
| Key Staff | 30 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 4 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 5 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 6 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 Level 3 - Restricted
Interview Detail Scores
| RFP Number: 73000-00009526 (35942) Project Name: CA/CEI OR 6 Wilson River Bridge________ | |||||||
| INTERVIEW SCORE DETAILS | |||||||
| Enter actual number of interview evaluators: | 1 | ||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||
| Maximum | |||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | ||
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 Level 3 - Restricted
References Detail Scores
| RFP Number: 73000-00009526 (35942) Project Name: CA/CEI OR 6 Wilson River Bridge________ | |||||||
| References Evaluation Detail Scores | |||||||
| Enter actual number of references scored: | 1 | ||||||
| Reference Scores | |||||||
| Maximum | |||||||
| Score | reference 1 | reference 2 | reference 3 | reference 4 | reference 5 | ||
| 1 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
&"Arial,Bold"&12REFERENCES SCORE DETAIL RFP xxx (PCMS xxx) &"Arial,Bold Italic"[insert project name]
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 Level 3 - Restricted
Summary Scores
| RFP Number: 73000-00009526 (35942) Project Name: CA/CEI OR 6 Wilson River Bridge________ | |
| EVALUATION SCORE SUMMARY | |
| Enter data only in gray highlighted fields on Summary, Proposal, Interview and Reference Score worksheets as applicable. |
| SOP Evaluation Summary Scores | Number of Proposal evaluators: | 3 | |||||||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||||||||
| Criteria 1 | Score | ||||||||||||
| Firm | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| Dowl | 100 | 1 | 115 | 1 | 120 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 335 | 112 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Statistics | |||||||||
| High Score | 100 | 115 | 120 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Low Score | 100 | 1 | 115 | 1 | 120 | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! |
| Range | 0 | 0 | 0 | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! |
| Interview Evaluation Summary Scores | Number of interview evaluators: | 1 | |||||||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||||||||
| Score | |||||||||||||
| Firm | name1 | name2 | name3 | name4 | name5 | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Statistics | |||||||||
| High Score | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Low Score | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! |
| Range | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! |
| References Summary Scores | Number of references scored: | 1 | |||||||||||
| References | |||||||||||||
| Score | |||||||||||||
| Firm | reference1 | reference2 | reference3 | reference4 | reference5 | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
FINAL SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable)
| Proposal | Interview | Enter | References | Final Scores | |||||
| Firm | Average | Average | Cost Scores | Total | Rank | ||||
| 112 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 112 | 1 | |
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| firm 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| firm 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| firm 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| firm 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Ver 10/20/16 _x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 Level 3 - Restricted
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .