Attachment 02_QASP.pdf
PDF 255 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Technical Support for Drug Free Workplace Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 277-24-0621
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for a federal contract opportunity to provide technical support for the Drug-Free Workplace Program (DFWP) administered by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP), Division of Workplace Programs (DWP).
The QASP outlines the performance standards, surveillance methods, and acceptable quality levels for various tasks under the contract, including: overall contract management and administration, group and workgroup support, operating and maintaining the DFWP ASR/Agency Archive Data System, certification and maintenance of federal DFWP plans, notifications to Congress, updates to DFWP tools, dissemination of information to DFWP stakeholders, consultation and briefings/trainings, and transition/transfer activities. The QASP also includes details on optional supplemental subject matter expert activities and supplemental meetings. The key objectives are to provide technical assistance, expertise and support for the federal DFWP program and monitor federal agency compliance.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP 277-24-0621
Attachment 2, QASP
Attachment 2: Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
Technical Support for Drug-Free Workplace
Task/Activity Description
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
DTM & OC
Requirements, Attachment 1c
IT Plans
IT Reports
IT training
Other IT deliverables
IT plans, reports and other IT deliverables are:
• Complete and Accurate:
- Requiring minimal revisions for approval
- current information
- accurate information including costs and calculations
• Compliant:
with security and privacy requirements
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
IT training:
• Complete:
completion of all required training
• Compliant:
with security and privacy requirements
• Timely:
Complete training and submit written proof of training completion on date requested by COR
Contracting Officer’s Representative
(COR)
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status
Reports
• SAMHSA
DTM IT staff feedback
• Monthly Progress Reports
IT plans, reports and other IT deliverables:
• Complete and Accurate:
No more than 2 errors or no more than 2 pieces of missing information per year, for IT deliverables
• Compliant:
No more than 1 IT deliverable is rejected by
SAMHSA, DTM
• Timely:
No more than 1 IT deliverable is received past due date
IT training:
• Complete:
100% contractor staff/consultants/ subcontractors complete 100% of all required training
• Compliant:
100% contractor staff/consultants/ subcontractors are compliant with IT security requirements
• Timely:
All training and proof of training completion are no more than 2 workdays past due date
Description
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Customer Satisfaction Contractor adheres to guidance provided by COR
COR & customer feedback
90% customer satisfaction rate, including COR comments
Task 1 Overall Contract Management and Administration to include cost and time
Communications:
Contractor maintains appropriate communications with COR, CO, DFWP stakeholders and partners:
• Professionalism
• Cooperativeness
• Cordial working relationship
• Responsiveness
• Communicates with Div. of Workplace
Programs (DWP) through COR
• Informs COR of new task activity, budget issues and other issues or problems in a timely manner
• Proactively anticipates needs and problems
Program Support:
Contractor supports the best interest of DFWP and DWP’s mission, i.e., when communicating with agencies and providing recommendations
Budget:
• Contractor remains within or below cost estimates, including meeting cost estimates
• No cost overruns
• Accurate and Complete vouchers;
no unallowable costs Quality Control:
• Internal inspection – appropriate layers of review Revisions:
Draft deliverables for all tasks show revisions (track changes or other method), or rationale for not making revisions
COR/CO
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• Budget estimates compared to actual costs/ expenses reports
• Vouchers
• Verbal, written and email communication to COR, CO, DWP staff and DFWP partners and stakeholders
• Feedback from DWP staff, and DFWP partners and stakeholders
• Monthly Progress Reports
Communications:
• No more than 2 complaints per year
• No more than 2 occasions of Contractor not responding to COR’s requests (i.e., emails, phone calls) within same day of request or no later than 8 business hours from request
• No more than 2 occasions of contractor communications to DWP about contract work without informing COR, i.e., contractor emailing DWP staff without sending a “cc” email to COR
• No more than 1 occasion of Contractor not informing COR of new task activity, budget and other issues/problems before they occur
Program Support:
• No more than 2 occasions of communications
(verbal, written draft or final communications) that are not in the best interest of the DFWP and DWP’s mission
Budget:
• No more than 1 occasion of actual cost being above cost estimate
• 0% cost overruns
• No more than 1 voucher per contract year needing revisions after sent to COR, i.e., due to mistakes, incompleteness or unallowable costs
Quality Control:
• No more than 2 identified occasions of skipped layers of contractor review
Revisions:
• No more than 1 occasion of a revised document provided without showing revisions in track changes or other method of showing revisions
Task 1.1 Develop and Finalize Work Plan
Work Plan Deliverables:
(Base Year only)
• 1.1.a.) Draft Work
Plan
• 1.1.b.) Final Work
Plan (Option Years)
• 1.1.c.) Annual
Review of Work Plan
Work Plan (Deliverables 1.1.a., 1.1.b., 1.1.c.):
• Complete:
- minimal missing information
- includes components indicated in
PWS and COR’s revisions, or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
with up-to-date information and minimal errors
• Well-organized:
clear information in concise format
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR/CO
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• Requested changes
• Monthly
Progress Reports
Work Plan (Deliverables 1.1.a., 1.1.b., 1.1.c.):
• Complete:
No more than 2 pieces of information are missing from Draft Work Plan
• Accurate:
100% information in Draft Work Plan is up-to-date, with no more than 2 errors
• Well-organized:
100% of Final Work Plan is in organized concise format according to template
• Timely:
Work plan is delivered no more than 2 workdays past due date
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 1.2 Contract Management Meetings
Contract Management Kick-off meeting (Base Year only) Deliverables:
• 1.2.a.) Participation
• 1.2.b.) Agenda
• 1.2.c.) Meeting
Summary
IT Privacy & Security Kick-off meeting (Base Year only) Deliverables:
• 1.2.d.) Participation
• 1.2.e.) Agenda
• 1.2.f.) Meeting
Summary
Recurring Contract Management meetings Deliverable:
• 1.2.g.) Participation
Participation (Deliverables 1.2.a., 1.2.d., 1.2.g.):
• Well-prepared:
Contractor/consultants have necessary information for meetings and participate by offering technical expertise
• Timely:
Contractor and consultants are on-time at meetings
Agendas & Meeting Summaries (Deliverables 1.2.b., 1.2.c., 1.2.e., 1.2.f.):
• Complete:
minimal missing information;
includes components noted in PWS and COR’s revisions, or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
minimal errors
• Well-organized:
clear information; concise format
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• Feedback from meeting attendees
• Observed
Contractor staff/ consultants attendance at meetings
• Review of agendas
• Review of meeting summaries
• Monthly Progress Reports
Participation (Deliverables 1.2.a., 1.2.d., 1.2.g.):
• Well-prepared:
No more than 1 occasion of contractor/consultants not prepared or not participating in meetings
• Timely:
No more than 2 occasions of invited contractor or consultants not attending or being late for meeting
Agendas & Meeting Summaries (Deliverables 1.2.b., 1.2.c., 1.2.e., 1.2.f.):
• Complete:
No more than 1 meeting agenda or summary has no more than 1 piece of missing information
• Accurate:
No more than 1 meeting agenda or 1 meeting summary has no more than 1 error
• Well-organized:
No more than 1 meeting agenda or 1 meeting summary contains disorganized format or unconcise wording
• Timely:
- No more than 1 meeting agenda is no later than
1 workday past due date
- No more than 1 meeting summary is no later than
2 workdays past due date Task 1.3 Administrative Reports
Deliverables:
• 1.3.a.) Monthly
Progress Report
• 1.3.b.) IT Reports
• 1.3.c.) Ad-hoc Administrative
Administrative Reports (Deliverables 1.3.a., 1.3.b., 1.3.c.):
• Complete:
with requested revisions and required components in PWS
• Accurate:
minimal errors; with most current information; accurate costs
• Well-organized:
clear information, succinct format, concise wording, according to template if applicable
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• Monthly Progress
Administrative Reports (Deliverables 1.3.a., 1.3.b., 1.3.c.):
• Complete:
No more than 1 report has no more than 2 pieces of missing information
• Accurate:
No more than 2 reports with errors; no more than 2 errors in any report; 100% accurate cost information
• Well-organized:
No more than 1 report has no more than 2 pieces of disorganized information
• Timely:
No more than 2 reports are no later than 1 workday past due date
Task 2 Group and Workgroup Support
Task 2.1 Technical SME Meeting Support
Deliverable:
• 2.1.a.) Technical
SME Meeting Support
Technical SME Meeting Support (Deliverable 2.1.a.):
• Well-prepared:
attendees have appropriate expertise; contractor/consultants have necessary information for meetings and participate in meetings; offer technical expertise;
and fulfill their role
• Timely:
Contractor and consultants are on-time at meetings
COR monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• Attendee feedback
• Meeting approvals
• Vouchers
• Progress Reports
• Expense Reports
Technical SME Meeting Support (Deliverable 2.1.a.)
• Well-prepared:
No more than 1 occasion of contractor or consultants not being well-prepared, not fully participating in meeting, or not fulfilling their role
• Timely:
No more than 2 occasions of invited contractor staff or consultants being late for meeting or not attending a meeting
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 2.2 Logistical Meeting Support
Deliverables:
• 2.2.a.) Logistical
Meeting Support
- Meeting Design
- Meeting Planning
- Pre-Meeting
- On-Site During
Meeting
- Post-Meeting
• 2.2.b) DTAB
Transcript and Meeting Summary Package
Meeting Materials:
- Transcripts
- Meeting
Summaries
- Agendas
- Presentations
- Other meeting materials
Logistical Meeting Support (Deliverable 2.2.a.):
• Complete:
all details are tended to for meeting planning, arrangements, and meeting activity coordination
• Well-organized:
- meetings are well-planned and well-coordinated
- meeting rooms/virtual platforms are functional and fit purpose of meetings
• Compliant:
with Federal government travel regulations and conference approval requirements
• Timely:
meetings are scheduled and planned far in advance
DTAB Transcript and Meeting Summary Package (Deliverable 2.2.b.):
• Complete:
with all components according to template or requested information
• Accurate:
minimal errors
• Well-organized:
clear information in succinct format and concise wording
• Compliant:
with requirements, i.e., FACA
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule;
pre-meeting documents provided before meeting
COR
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status
Reports
• Feedback from attendees
• Conference approvals
• Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
• Vouchers
• Monthly
Progress Reports
• Expense Reports
Logistical Meeting Support (Deliverable 2.2.a.)
• Complete:
No more than 2 meeting details are missing from no more than 1 meeting (i.e., invitee not contacted)
• Well-organized:
- No more than 1 meeting is not well-planned or not well-coordinated
- No more than 2 occasions of meeting problems, or inappropriate meeting room/virtual platform
- No more than 2 complaints
• Compliant:
100% of meetings are compliant with federal travel regulations and conference approval requirements
• Timely:
- Late meeting planning/scheduling – No more than 1 anticipated meeting is planned and scheduled less than 1 month in advance for large meetings, and less than 1 week in advance for small meetings
- No more than 2 occasions of a 15-minute (or more) delay in starting meeting due to logistical issues
DTAB Transcript and Meeting Summary Package (Deliverable 2.2.b.)
• Complete:
No more than 1 meeting document has no more than 2 pieces of missing information for no more than 1 meeting
• Accurate:
No more than 1 meeting document has no more than 2 errors (i.e., errors in spelling, content, scientific terminology)
• Well-organized:
No more than 1 document/report has no more than 2 pieces of disorganized information
• Compliant:
100% of meetings are compliant with FACA or other requirements
• Timely:
- No more than 2 occasions of pre-meeting documents provided to attendees less than 1 week prior to meeting
- No more than 2 occasions of post-meeting documents no more than 2 workdays past due date
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 3 DFWP ASR/Agency Archive Data System
Task 3.1 Operate and Maintain ASR/Archive System:
Records Management Deliverables:
• 3.1.a.) Create New Data
Records
• 3.1.b.) Update Data
Records
Data Collection Deliverables:
• 3.1.c.) Review Data
Collection Documents and Provide Recommended Revisions
• 3.1.d.) Revise Data Collection Documents
• 3.1.e.) Perform Data Collection
• 3.1.f.) Technical Assistance on Data Entry and Reporting
Data Analyses
• 3.1.g.) Perform Data
Analyses
Data Quality
• 3.1.h.) Correct Data
System Review
• 3.1.i.) System
Recommendations
System Modifications/ Enhancements Deliverables:
• 3.1.j.) System Updates
• 3.1.k.) System Upgrades
Records Management (Deliverables 3.1.a., 3.1.b.)
• Complete:
with new and updated data records
• Accurate:
with up-to-date information;
minimal errors; and consistency among records
• Well-Organized:
clear information, well-structured and minimal duplication of data records
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
Data Collection & Analyses & Quality (Deliverables 3.1.c., 3.1.d., 3.1.e., 3.1.f., 3.1.g., 3.1.h.)
(includes these documents: data collection instrument, data entry screens, data reports, alert and launch memos, user guide)
• Complete:
documents, analyses and processes are complete
• Accurate:
content per quality control checks according to Delivery Schedule
(Deliverable 3.1.i.)
• Complete:
recommendations demonstrate detailed review of system and provide rational suggestions
• Well-Organized:
clear recommendations provided in an organized format
System Modifications/ Enhancements (Deliverables: 3.1.j., 3.1.k.)
• Complete:
Updates/upgrades completed according to requests with minimal missed requests
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• System review
• Review of requested record updates
• Feedback from DWP staff, and DFWP partners and stakeholders
• Contractor’s records of TA provided
• Monthly Progress
Records Management (Deliverables 3.1.a., 3.1.b.)
• Complete/Accurate/Well-Organized/
Timely:
No more than 2 occasions of incomplete, inaccurate or disorganized data records, or delays in accessing records
Data Collection & Analyses & Quality (Deliverables 3.1.c., 3.1.d., 3.1.e., 3.1.f., 3.1.g., 3.1.h.)
(includes these documents: data collection instrument, data entry screens, data reports, alert and launch memos, user guide)
• Complete:
- No more than 1 occasion of incomplete data collection activity, TA or quality control checks
- No more than 1 document/analysis is missing no more than 2 pieces of information requested
• Accurate:
- No more than 2 errors in data collection activity, TA or quality control checks
- No more than 1 document/analysis with no more than 2 errors
• Timely:
No more than 2 occasions of delay no more than 2 workdays past the due date
(Deliverable 3.1.i.)
• Complete & Well-Organized:
No more than 2 pieces of information are missing or in disorganized format
System Modifications/Enhancements (Deliverables: 3.1.j., 3.1.k.)
• Complete:
No more than 2 missed requests for system updates/upgrades
• Timely:
No more than 1 occasion of delay no more than 2 workdays past due date
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 3.2 ASR Annual Data Reporting
Annual Schedule – for Data Collection & Reporting Deliverables:
• 3.2.a.) Draft Annual
Schedule
• 3.2.b.) Final Annual
Schedule
DFWP ASR Annual
Deliverables:
• 3.2.c.) Draft DFWP ASR Annual Aggregate Report
• 3.2.d.) Final DFWP ASR Annual Aggregate Report
• 3.2.e.) Agency Profile Annual Report
Annual Schedule – for Data Collection & Reporting (Deliverables 3.2.a., 3.2.b.)
• Complete:
with due dates for all activities listed in Task 3.2. of PWS, and COR’s revisions
• Accurate:
minimal errors
DFWP ASR Annual
(Deliverables 3.2.c., 3.2.d., 3.2.e.)
• Complete:
with data received and including COR’s revisions
• Accurate:
- minimal errors
- current information
• Well-Organized:
with concise summary highlights and follows template
• Timely:
according to Schedule in Deliverable 3.2.b.
COR monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• ASR schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• Goal of 90% agency ASR response rate
• Feedback from DWP staff, DFWP partners/ stakeholders and ASR system users
• Monthly
Annual Schedule – for Data Collection & Reporting (Deliverables 3.2.a., 3.2.b.)
• Complete:
- Draft schedule: missing no more than 2 pieces of information
- Final schedule: 100% complete with due dates for all activities listed in Task 3.2. of PWS and COR’s revisions, or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
Final schedule: No more than 2 errors (i.e., spelling, inappropriate due date)
DFWP ASR Annual Report – Draft (Deliverable 3.2.c.)
• Complete:
Complete with no more than 2 pieces of missing information or data from agency data received (i.e., missing narrative data responses, percent sign, COR’s revisions)
• Accurate:
- No more than 2 inaccurate and invalid data found (i.e., no incorrect auto-calculations)
- No more than 2 errors
- Data discrepancies are resolved with agencies in advance so that no more than 2 data discrepancies are found
• Well-Organized:
- No more than 2 pieces of disorganized data/information
- 85% follows approved outline/template
- Contains graphics summarizing data tables & key information
No more than 1 occasion of 2 or more weeks past due date
DFWP ASR Annual Report – Final (Deliverable 3.2.d)
At least 90% agency response rate or demonstrated attempts to reach unresponsive agencies; includes 100% of data received (including narrative responses); reflects 100% of comments received or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
- 100% accurate with current information and valid data (i.e., no incorrect auto-calculations)
- No more than 2 errors
- Data discrepancies are resolved with agencies in advance such that no data discrepancies are found
• Well-Organized:
- No more than 1 piece of disorganized data/information
- 100% follows approved outline/template
- Contains graphics summarizing data tables & key information
No more than 1 occasion of 2 or more weeks past due date
Agency Profile Annual Report (Deliverable 3.2.e.)
• Complete & Accurate:
- Includes 100% of data received (including narrative responses)
- 100% accurate and valid data
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 3.3 Special Reports
• 3.3.a.) Ad-hoc Special
Data Reports
Ad-hoc Special Data Reports (Deliverable 3.3.a.)
• Complete:
with data received and including COR’s revisions
• Accurate:
minimal errors
• Well-Organized:
clear information in concise format
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• Feedback from
DWP staff, DFWP partners/ stakeholders and ASR system users
• Monthly Progress Reports
Ad-hoc Special Data Reports (Deliverable 3.3.a.)
• Complete:
- No more than 1 report with no more than 2 pieces of missing information (i.e., missing percent sign)
- Reflects all COR’s comments or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
- 100% accurate with current information and valid data (i.e., no incorrect auto-calculations)
- No more than 1 report with no more than 2 errors
• Well-Organized:
No more than 1 report with no more than 2 pieces of disorganized data/information
• Timely:
No more than 1 occasion of no more than 2 days past due date
Task 4 Certification and Maintenance of Federal DFWP Plans
TA to Agencies Deliverable:
• 4.a.) TA Responses Review Agency DFWP Plans Deliverable:
• 4.b.) Plan Review
Package Notification of Completed Reviews and Plans Deliverables:
• 4.c.) Notification
• 4.d.) Comprehensive
Package of Review Activity
ICG-EC Plan/TDP Reviews Deliverables:
• 4.e.) Plan/TDP Review
Package
• 4.f.) Summary Report of ICG-EC Review Contacting Agencies Deliverables:
• 4.g.) Follow-up with
Agencies
• 4.h.) Identify New
Agencies
• 4.i.) New Contact with
Agencies
TA to Agencies, DFWP Plan Reviews, and Contacting Agencies (Deliverables: 4.a., 4.b., 4.c., 4.d., 4.e., 4.f., 4.g., 4.h., 4.i.)
• Complete:
- TA responses address requesters’ needs
- Plan reviews indicate thorough review activity and compliance with policy requirements
- Summary report includes all ICG- EC reviews and comments
- Comprehensive contact with agencies
• Accurate:
minimal errors
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• Feedback from
DWP staff and federal agencies
• Monthly Progress Reports
• Model Plan
• TDP Guidance
• Contract’s records of TA provided
TA to Agencies, DFWP Plan Reviews, and Contacting Agencies (Deliverables: 4.a., 4.b., 4.c., 4.d., 4.e., 4.f., 4.g., 4.h., 4.i.)
• Complete:
No more than 1 response/package/report with no more than 2 pieces of missing information
• Accurate:
No more than 1 response/package/report with no more than 2 errors
• Timely:
- No more than 1 response/package/report is no more than 2 workdays past due date
- No more than 1 notification to the COR is no more than 2 workdays past due date
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 5 Notifications to Congress
Deliverables:
• 5.a.) Draft
Notification to Congress
• 5.b.) Final Notification to Congress
Draft and Final Notifications to Congress (Deliverables 5.a., 5.b.)
• Complete:
with components and COR’s revisions, or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
- minimal errors
- accurately follows package requirements
• Well-Organized:
clear information in concise format
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status
Reports
• Feedback from
SAMHSA
and HHS
• Monthly Progress Reports
Draft reports (Deliverable 5.a.)
• Complete:
- No more than 1 report with no more than 2 pieces of missing information
- No more than 1 report with no more than 2 missing package components according to requirements
- Missing no more than 2 of COR’s requested revisions or provides rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
- No more than 2 errors
- 85% follows package requirements
• Well-Organized:
No more than 2 pieces of disorganized or unclear information, or unconcise format
• Timely:
No more than 1 occasion of 2 or more workdays past due
Final report (Deliverable 5.b.)
• Complete:
100% complete with all information and components according to requirements; reflects all COR’s requested revisions or rationale for not including all revisions
• Accurate:
100% error-free; 100% follows package requirements
• Well-Organized:
No more than 1 piece of disorganized or unclear information, or unconcise format
• Timely:
No more than 1 occasion of no more than 2 workdays past due date
Task 6 DFWP Tools – Updates
DFWP Tools (documents) Deliverables:
• 6.a.) Review
DFWP
Tools
• 6.b.) Revise
DFWP
Tools
• 6.c.) Clearance Documents
• 6.d.) Final
DFWP
Tools
• 6.e.) Recommend Efficiencies
DFWP Tools (documents) (Deliverables 6.a., 6.e.)
• Complete:
recommendations demonstrate detailed and thorough review and provide rational suggestions
• Consistent:
with DFWP requirements and program updates
(Deliverables 6.b., 6.c., 6.d.):
minimal missing information and includes COR’s requested revisions, or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate/Consistent:
minimal errors; and consistent with requirements and program updates
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status
Reports
• Monthly
Progress Reports
• DFWP
program requirements
• Clearance requirements
DFWP Tools (documents) (Deliverables 6.a., 6.e.)
- No more than 2 pieces of information were missed among all documents during review
- 85% recommendations are rational suggestions
• Consistent:
100% consistent with DFWP requirements and program updates
(Deliverables 6.b., 6.c., 6.d.)
• Complete:
- No more than 1 document is missing no more than 2 pieces of information
- Reflects 100% of COR’s comments or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate/Consistent:
- No more than 1 document with no more than 2 errors
- 100% consistent with requirements and program updates, and contains current information
• Timely:
No more than 1 document is no more than 2 workdays past due date
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 7 Dissemination of Information to DFWP Stakeholders
Distribution Deliverables:
• 7.a.) Routine
Distribution of HHS Certified Lab List
• 7.b.) Occasional Ad-hoc Distribution
Mailing Lists Deliverables:
• 7.c.) Existing mailing lists
• 7.d.) New mailing lists
Distribution & Mailing Lists (Deliverables 7.a., 7.b., 7.c., 7.d.)
• Complete:
- complete email addresses and mailing list updates
- minimal missing components
• Accurate:
Mail-out package components and mailing lists
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status
Reports
• Monthly
Progress Reports
• Feedback from COR and recipients on mailing list
Distribute Information Materials & Mailing Lists (Deliverables 7.a., 7.b., 7.c., 7.d.)
• Complete:
- No more than 1 missing package component in mailing
- No more than 1 occasion of 2 or more missed mailing addresses or mailing list updates
- No more than 2 complaints
- 100% follow-up on non-deliverables/email bounce backs
• Accurate:
- No more than 2 errors in no more than 1 mail-out (i.e., sending wrong information, sending to wrong person, error in following mailing instructions)
- Items produced have no more than 2 errors
• Timely:
- No more than 1 occasion of no more than 2 workdays past due date
- 100% of time-sensitive alert notices meet deadline
Task 8 Consultation – Briefings and Trainings
Briefings and Trainings Deliverables:
• 8.a.) Respond to
Requests for Briefings/ Trainings
• 8.b.) Provide Briefings/ Trainings
Briefing/Training Materials Deliverable:
• 8.c.) Other Additional
Presentation Materials
Tracking DPC Briefings Deliverables:
• 8.d.) Arrange, Schedule, Track DPC Briefing Requests
• 8.e.) Report Status of DPC Briefings
Briefings and Trainings (Deliverables 8.a., 8.b., 8.c., 8.d., 8.e.)
• Complete:
- minimal missing information and includes COR’s revisions, or rationale for not making revisions
- detailed tracking of briefings
• Accurate:
- up-to-date information
- minimal errors
- consistent with program requirements and updates
• Well-Organized:
clear information in succinct format and concise wording
• Timely:
- according to
Delivery Schedule
- on time for briefings
COR
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status
Reports
• Feedback from agencies
• Monthly Progress Reports
• Contractor’s records of briefings and trainings provided
• Attended briefings/ trainings
Briefings and Trainings (Deliverables 8.a., 8.b., 8.c., 8.d., 8.e.)
• Complete:
- No more than 2 pieces of missing information
- Missing no more than 2 of COR’s requested revisions or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
- No more than 2 errors
- No more than 2 pieces of inaccurate or inconsistent information
• Well-Organized:
- No more than 2 pieces of disorganized or unclear information, or unconcise format
- No more than 1 occasion of contractor not informing
COR of new DPCs and briefings
- Briefings/trainings are appropriate for audience
• Complaints:
No more than 2 complaints
• Timely:
100% of contractor staff providing briefings/trainings are on time and attend 100% of contractor’s scheduled briefings/trainings
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 9 Subject Matter Expert (SME) Activities/ Special Projects
Deliverable:
• 9.a.) SME
Special Projects
SME Special Projects (Deliverable 9.a.)
• Complete:
- minimal missing information
- includes COR’s revisions, or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
- up-to-date information
- minimal errors
- consistent with program requirements and updates
• Well-Organized:
clear information in succinct format and concise wording
• Thorough:
- provide high quality professional work, i.e., appropriate detail, in-depth research, and demonstrated expertise in successfully addressing topics
- detailed review and rational recommendations
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule
COR
monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status
Reports
• Feedback from staff, DFWP partners and stakeholders
• Monthly
SME Special Projects (Deliverable 9.a.)
- No more than 1 document with no more than 2 pieces of missing information
- No more than 1 document missing no more than 2 of COR’s requested revisions, or rationale for not making revisions
• Accurate:
- 100% consistent with program requirements and updates, and contains current information
- No more than 2 errors in no more than 1 document
- No more than 2 pieces of inconsistent information in no more than 1 document (i.e., inconsistent with current program requirements)
• Well-Organized:
No more than 1 document with no more than 2 pieces of disorganized or unclear information, or unconcise format or wording
• Thorough:
- No more than 1 project is provided without appropriate detail, in-depth research and demonstrated expertise in successfully addressing topics
- No more than 1 project is provided without detailed review and rational recommendations
• 100% appropriate staff and consultants with appropriate expertise work on projects; 0% unnecessary staff work on projects
• Complaints:
No more than 2 complaints
• Timely:
No more than 1 occasion of 2 or more workdays past due date
Performance Standard Surveillance Method
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) (“Satisfactory” rating)
Task 10 Transition/Transfer Activities – Contract Closeout
Deliverable:
• 10.a. 90-Day
Transition Plan
Transition Activities Deliverables:
• 10.b. Implement
Transition Plan
• 10.c. Close-out
Meetings
• 10.d. Training
Transfer Activities Deliverables:
• 10.e. Transfer IT
System
• 10.f. Transfer
Documentation
• 10.g. Notify the COR
System Migration Deliverables:
• 10.h. Work Plan
• 10.i. Approvals for
System Migration
• 10.j. Implement Work
Plan
90-Day Transition Plan/ Transition Activities/Transfer Activities (Deliverables 10.a., 10.b., 10.d., 10.e., 10.f., 10.g.)
• Complete:
- minimal missing information from 90-Day Transition Plan
- completed transition and transfer activities without system disruptions
• Accurate:
minimal errors
• Well-Organized:
clear information in concise format
• Timely:
according to Delivery Schedule and 90-Day Transition Plan schedule
Participation in Close-out Meetings (Deliverable 10.c.)
• Well-prepared:
- contractor and consultants are well-prepared with necessary information
- appropriate attendees offer technical expertise
• Timely:
contractor staff and consultants are on-time at meetings
System Migration (Deliverables 10.h., 10.i., 10.j.)
• Complete:
completed in an efficient manner that does not disrupt system operations
• Timely:
according to migration Work Plan schedule
COR monitoring according to:
• PWS
• Delivery
Schedule
• Deliverables
• Status Reports
• 90-Day
Transition Plan
• Migration Work
Plan
• Feedback from contractor and government confirming effective completion of contract turnover
• Amount of COR time required for transition
• Efficient transition – services continue without disruption
• IT and other requirements
• Monthly Progress Reports
90-Day Transition Plan/Transition Activities/Transfer Activities (Deliverables 10.a., 10.b., 10.d., 10.e., 10.f., 10.g.)
• Complete:
- No more than 2 pieces of missing information, i.e., COR’s revisions
- 100% transition and transfer activities are completed; no unresolved problems
• Accurate:
No more than 1 error
• Well-Organized:
No more than 2 pieces of disorganized information
• Timely:
No more than 1 occasion of no more than 2 workdays past due date
Participation in Close-out Meetings (Deliverable 10.c.)
• Well-prepared:
- No more than 1 occasion of unprepared staff/consultants
- 100% meetings attended by 100% of appropriate staff/consultants with technical expertise
• Timely:
No more than 2 occasions of invited contractor staff/consultants being late for meeting or not attending a meeting
System Migration (Deliverables 10.h., 10.i., 10.j.)
• Complete:
100% efficient and orderly contract closeout
• Timely:
No more than 1 hour system disruption
OPTIONAL Task 11 Supplemental SME Activities/Special Projects
Deliverable:
• 11.a. SME Special
Projects
FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE
TASK 9 in this QASP
SEE TASK 9 in this
QASP
SEE TASK 9 in this QASP
OPTIONAL Task 12 Supplemental Meetings
Deliverable:
• 12.a. Meeting Support
FOR MORE INFORMATION, SEE
TASK 2 in this QASP
SEE TASK 2 in this
QASP
SEE TASK 2 in this QASP
Attachment 2: Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Technical Support for Drug-Free Workplace
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .