20201130_RFQ_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- School for Command Preparation, Command Team Spouse Development Program - Brigade Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91QF421Q0003
About this file
This document contains a performance assessment questionnaire for a non-personal services contract to provide instruction for the spouses of Brigade Commander and Brigade Command Sergeant Major designees. The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain an accredited graduate-level course preparing spouses to function as informal leaders within a brigade command environment. The contractor must instruct the course in support of the Command Team Spouse Development Program - Brigade for up to 25 students per seminar, 7 times a year from February 2021 through September 2021. After September 2021, the contractor must instruct the course for up to 16 students per seminar, 7 times a year. The solicitation number is W91QF421Q0003 and was issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis. The respondent must complete and return the performance assessment questionnaire by the stated deadline.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 20201229_RFQ_Attachment_7_Questions_and_Answers_Revised.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 20201229_RFQ_W91QF421Q0003_MOD0003_SCP_CTSDP_BDE.pdf | ||
| 20201216_RFQ_W91QF421Q0003_MOD0002_SCP_CTSDP_BDE_.pdf | ||
| 20201214_RFQ_Attachment_7_Questions_and_Answers_Revised.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 20201211_QuestionsandAnswer.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation.pdf | ||
| 20201203_RFQ_W91QF421Q0003_SCP_CTSDP_BDE.pdf | ||
| 20201130_RFQ_Attachment 1_SCP_CTSDP_BDE_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf | ||
| 20201130_RFQ_Attachment_5_Prior_Contract_Reference_Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| 20201130_RFQ_Attachment_3_SCP_CTSDP_BDE_Course_Schedule.pdf | ||
| 20201130_RFQ_Attachment_6_Question_Submission_Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 20201130_RFQ_Attachment_2_SCP_CTSDP_BDE_Performance_Requirements_Summary.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
SUBJECT: Vendor Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Quotation (RFQ) W91QF421Q0003
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate vendors on the subject RFQ. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the vendors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] Code 611310 – Colleges, Universities and Professional Schools. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return no later than 15 days after receipt of request or (insert solicitation due date), whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Weston Coffindaffer, Contract Specialist at weston.t.coffindaffer.civ@mail.mil and copy the undersigned.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at wendy.d.fields2.civ@mail.mil.
Sincerely, Wendy D. Fields Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The vendor has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The vendor has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The vendor has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The vendor has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Vendor)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF VENDOR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: _________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .