J A LISBON DCR GUY CHADDOCK.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- LISBON DCR GUY CHADDOCK
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM24P0353
About this file
This document is a Sole Source Justification for a simplified acquisition under FAR Part 13. It proposes a sole source award to CHADDOCK (FERGUSON COPELAND) to provide custom casegoods and upholstery products for the DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION'S RESIDENCE IN LISBON, PORTUGAL at a total cost of $10,641.00. The justification cites the unique qualifications of the vendor to meet the stringent design requirements and existing conditions of the representational residence. Market research was conducted to validate CHADDOCK as the most appropriate vendor. The Contracting Officer determined the anticipated price to be fair and reasonable. This acquisition is not subject to full and open competition due to the specialized nature of the furniture requirements.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Mar 14, 2024
SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FOR SIMPLFIED ACQUISITIONS
FAR Part 13.106-1(b)(1)(i)
1. Identification of the agency and the contracting activity:
In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), the Office of Acquisition Management proposes to award a purchase order on the basis of other than full and open competition with CHADDOCK (FERGUSON COPELAND) who provides Casegoods and Upholstery products, on behalf of OBO/OPS/RDF. The total estimated cost is $10641.00.
2. The nature and/or description of the action being approved.
The action being approved is a new contract.
3. A description of the supplies or services required to meet the Department’s needs.
OBO/OPS/RDF has identified the CHADDOCK (FERGUSON COPELAND) pieces for the level of customization offered by this company. The selected pieces will not only coordinate with the unique architectural details, the environment, and the existing conditions of the DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION'S RESIDENCE IN LISBON, PORTUGAL, but that will also withstand the type of usage of our representational areas given our replacement cycles.
The requirement is to provide for the DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION'S RESIDENCE IN LISBON, PORTUGAL at a total cost of $10641.00. This will allow the DEPUTY CHIEF OF
MISSION'S RESIDENCE IN LISBON, PORTUGAL meet the stringent standard of representational residences.
4. An identification of the statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition:
This new contract is permitted in accordance with FAR 13.106(b)(1)(i), in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1901
5. A demonstration that the proposed contractor’s unique qualifications or the nature of the action require use of the authority cited.
CHADDOCK (FERGUSON COPELAND) is uniquely qualified for the nature of the acquisition, for it allows our designers to fulfill the design plan created for these representational residences.
6. A description of the efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable.
In selecting these items, extensive market research was conducted to verify the validity of the specific vendor, CHADDOCK (FERGUSON COPELAND), as meeting the highest
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
standards of RDF’s representational requirements. Multiple vendors and their products were compared to the quality, value and appropriateness of the final selections. These products were determined to be the most appropriate selection for the architecture, environment and existing condition of the DEPUTY CHIEF OF MISSION'S RESIDENCE IN LISBON, PORTUGAL.
7. A determination by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable. Note: dollar amounts may not exceed statutory limitations for the commercial items test program identified in FAR 13.500.
The Contracting Office determines that the anticipated price will be fair and reasonable based on extensive market research and previous purchases. By signing the justification, the Contracting Officer makes a determination that the cost/price to the Government are expected to be fair and reasonable.
8. A description of the market research conducted (per FAR Part 10) and the results or a statement of the reason market research was not conducted.
See point #6.
9. Any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition such as:
None.
10. A listing of the sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.
None.
11. A statement of any actions the agency will take to remove or overcome any future barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services required.
Procurement of representational furniture does not lend itself to advertising or competition because selection is based on quality, type of house, climate or historical requirements. The Office of Residential Design and Furnishings (OBO/OPS/RDF) has a vast library for consideration. In addition to catalogs and samples RDF’s librarian arranges for vendors to visit the office to make new or updated product presentations to the design staff. The design staff always seeks new sources for goods by attending biannual trade shows.
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
CERTIFICATIONS
TECHNICAL AND REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION
I certify that this justification is accurate and contains complete data necessary to support the recommendation for other than full and open competition.
SIGNATURE:
3/14/2024 17:42:10 Sharon T. Kroszkewicz Date Office Director, Residential Design & Furnishings
OBO/OPS/RDF
CONTRACTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION
I certify that this submission is accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that it contains complete information necessary to enable other officials to make an informed recommendation for approval or disapproval. (Ref: 13.106-1(b)(1)(i) Soliciting from a single source)
SIGNATURE:
CD
C A
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
Laquetta Smalls Contract Specialist
A/OPE/IPCOM
04/02/2024
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .